Agitation is common across neuropsychiatric disorders and contributes to disability, institutionalization, and diminished quality of life for patients and their caregivers. In 2015 IPA convened a transparent process to build a consensus definition of agitation and agreement on what elements should be included in the syndrome that resulted in publication of provisional guidelines. (Cummings et al, 2015) In the 2020-2021 year, the two co-chairs of this symposium have led a new workgroup to make the provisional consensus definition of agitation in patients with cognitive disorders that can be applied in epidemiologic, non-interventional clinical, pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic interventional, and neurobiological studies and guide treatment final.

Co-Chairs will discuss methods used in updating and findings and compare changes made to the provisional guidelines. Dr. Sano will present new findings on the biological basis of agitation in dementia and Dr. Mintzer will present on application of guidelines in the special circumstances of persons in palliative and hospice care. Dr. Rosenberg will discuss the special circumstance of agitation care in hospital emergency departments. Mr. Splaine will present findings about the utilization of the 2015 guidelines in the peer reviewed literature, professional and government dementia care guidance, and clinical trials.

Cummings, J., Mintzer, J., Brodaty, H., Sano, M., Banerjee, S., Devanand, D., … Zhong, K. (2015). Agitation in cognitive disorders: International Psychogeriatric Association provisional consensus clinical and research definition. International Psychogeriatrics, 27(1), 7-17. doi:10.1017/S1041610214001963

Depression and cognitive impairment are highly prevalent in type 2 diabetes (T2D), yet little is known about how their relationship varies by sex. We examined this question in a large T2D sample (N = 897) of non-demented elderly (≥ 65) participating in the Israel Diabetes and Cognitive Decline (IDCD) Study. Cognition was evaluated by a comprehensive neuropsychological battery and depressive symptoms were assessed by the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). The results showed that in all but the executive function domain, the association of depressive symptoms with poorer cognitive function was stronger in women than men, with a significant interaction for language/semantic categorization and missed significance for episodic memory. When defining clinical depression as GDS of ≥6, women with depression had significantly poorer language/semantic categorization, episodic memory, and overall cognitive function. Inclusion of antidepressants in the model did not alter substantively the associations. Our results suggest that depressed T2D women may have poorer cognitive performance, highlighting the significance of sex-specific personalized management of depression in elderly diabetics.

A major challenge in the management of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is accurate diagnosis of the condition. Aging itself is associated with cognitive change, and physicians must first distinguish between age-associated complaints and true memory impairment as in AD before optimal management can begin. This article reviews tools used to assess and diagnose AD patients in both the primary care and clinical trial setting. AD assessment instruments commonly used in research may be too cumbersome for use in primary care. Tools specifically designed to meet the needs of busy practitioners that can accurately assess function, cognition, and global change will be reviewed. The issues of cognitive screening in old age and age-associated memory impairment will be discussed. Similarly, the pitfalls and advantages of routine cognitive screening in daily practice will be addressed.

Alzheimer's disease represents a significant challenge to the aging population. Since most estimates suggest that AD has a multifactorial etiology, the challenge to find preventative approaches is particularly great. With the aging of the population and the very high incidence from the eighth decade on, the challenge is further enhanced by the need to think of relatively safe interventions given the relative frailty of this elderly population. The need to find safe treatments, or ones with well-understood safety profiles, has led to the examination of known agents for potential dementia-preventing properties. Data supporting these interventions comes from observational studies, laboratory analyses, and clinical trials. Potential mechanisms for prevention of AD include anti-inflammatory and antioxidant approaches. Modulation of risk factors associated with cardiac disease may also reduce the risk of AD. Known agents have been examined for their potential to modify amyloid pathology. Trial designs to address prevention of AD include both primary and secondary prevention studies as well designs to assess slowing disease progression. Information can also be gathered when dementia evaluation is added to ongoing studies. As results from these studies becoming available, we will be able to refine our approach to managing this disease.

The introduction of the amyloid hypothesis, which identifies amyloid as the primary target for treating Alzheimer’s disease (AD), was a watershed in the field of AD research. Treatment approaches have since focused on how amyloid might be manipulated. In fact, there are challenges to amyloid manipulation. First, removal of amyloid has shown minimal clinical effects. Second, some data indicate that secretase modulation shows hints of stimulating feedback systems, which cause concern over how to effectively manipulate amyloid. Third, side-effect profiles of the direct manipulation of amyloid are not currently optimal. Finally, evidence suggests that cell and synapse loss may be better markers of dementia and its severity. Alternative approaches to direct manipulation of amyloid include antioxidant mechanisms for prevention, anti-inflammatory mechanisms for neuroprotection, manipulation of metabolic risks, modification of tau accumulation, and neuroregeneration.

These alternative mechanisms of action provide support for a wide range of potential agents for clinical trials. The exact connection between mechanism of action and clinical outcomes is not well defined, but typically trial designs using these mechanisms attempt to measure affects on disease progression, often with longer studies that include established clinical outcomes accompanied by putative biomarkers of disease. One trend that has provided much information has been to examine the effects of these drugs in subjects at risk for AD, thereby expanding the intervention to prevention of disease. These studies include both secondary prevention studies, for example deferring onset in those with prodromal disease such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and primary prevention directed at those with no specific signs or symptoms.

Background: Physicians often miss diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early dementia and screening measures can be insensitive to very mild impairments. Other cognitive assessments may take too much time or be frustrating to seniors. This study examined the ability of an audio-recorded scale, developed in Australia, to detect MCI or mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and compared cognitive domain-specific performance on the audio-recorded scale to in-person battery and common cognitive screens.

Method: Seventy-six patients from the Mount Sinai Alzheimer's Disease Research Center were recruited. Patients were aged 75 years or older, with clinical diagnosis of AD or MCI (n = 51) or normal control (n = 25). Participants underwent in-person neuropsychological testing followed by testing with the audio-recorded cognitive screen (ARCS).

Results: ARCS provided better discrimination between normal and impaired elderly individuals than either the Mini-Mental State Examination or the clock drawing test. The in-person battery and ARCS analogous variables were significantly correlated, most in the 0.4 to 0.7 range, including verbal memory, executive function/attention, naming, and verbal fluency. The area under the curve generated from the receiver operating characteristic curves indicated high and equivalent discrimination for ARCS and the in-person battery (0.972 vs. 0.988; p = 0.23).

Conclusion: The ARCS demonstrated better discrimination between normal controls and those with mild deficits than typical screening measures. Performance on cognitive domains within the ARCS was well correlated with the in-person battery. Completion of the ARCS was accomplished despite mild difficulty hearing the instructions even in very elderly participants, indicating that it may be a useful measure in primary care settings.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by progressive decline in memory, language and other cognitive functions. Deficits in attentional processes have also been suggested. A simple reaction time (RT) task was used to assess global attention in AD. The length and consistency of a warning signal given prior to the response stimulus were manipulated to determine if patients with AD and age-matched controls benefit from predictability in RT tasks. Overall reaction time was slower in the AD group than in the and control group. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in RT with long warning signals compared to short warning signals, but only the control group benefited from the consistency of the warning. (JINS, 1995, I, 56–61.)

Objective: Despite numerous clinical trials, it is unknown whether ethnicity affects treatment response to cognitive enhancers in Alzheimer's disease (AD). There is convincing evidence of ethnic and genetic variability in drug metabolism. This article reviews the available data on ethnicity in clinical trials for AD to answer two questions: (1) what are the challenges to diagnose and treat AD across different ethnic groups, and (2) are there differences in response to pharmacologic interventions for AD across these different ethnic groups?

Method: Available data from Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) randomized controlled clinical trials and from randomized controlled industry-sponsored trials for four cognitive enhancers (donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and sabeluzole) were pooled to assess the numbers of non-Caucasian participants.

Results: The participation of ethnic minority subjects in clinical trials for AD was dependent on the funding source, although Caucasian participants were over-represented and non-Caucasian participants were under-represented in the clinical trials. Because of the low participation rate of ethnic minorities, there were insufficient data to assess any differences in treatment outcome among different ethnic groups. Strategies to improve diversity in clinical trials are discussed.

Conclusion: Greater participation of ethnically diverse participants in clinical trials for AD would generate additional information on possible differences in metabolism, treatment response, adverse events to therapeutic agents, and could foster the investigation of genetic variability among ethnic groups.

Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders: Clinical and Research Aspects. Irene Litvan (Ed.). 2005. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 512 pp., $175.00 (HB).

This edited collection of perspectives on Atypical Parkinson's Disease, or Parkinson's plus as it is often called, is both a treasure and a pleasure. The editor, Irene Litvan, ably accomplishes the daunting task of bringing order to what might be considered a grab bag of diagnostic leftovers in Chapter 1. To the generalist, fair warning that Parkinson's plus may be misconstrued as Parkinson's minus, since tremor, the most commonly recognized symptom may not be a feature of at least some of these syndromes. Litvan provides us with an organizational structure for summarizing clinical features and surmising etiologies. An extensive literature review is distilled to give impressions of when to suspect these diagnoses, hints to the natural progression, and discussion of the validity of specific diagnoses within the atypical PD spectrum. Chapter 2, on historical perspectives, is one that is so tempting to skip in the rush to get to the most up to date science. Please don't, because it is one of the gems of this tome. In his readable style, Christopher Goetz reminds us that clinical skill begins with being a good observer and this will serve the field throughout time. His selection of historical anecdotes, literary passages, and classic photographs illustrates the timelessness of some of these clinical entities. The photograph from the 1925 Lhermitte et al. report so captured the syndrome of cortical basal degeneration, that I suddenly recalled several similar patients and was reassured that there was something more than idiosyncratic imposition of this diagnosis.