Cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; previously known as “sluggish cognitive tempo” or SCT) refers to a set of behavioral symptoms characterized by slowed thinking/behavior, daydreaming, and mental fogginess or confusion. It has been described as related to, yet separate from, symptoms associated with Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) inattention. There is a paucity of research on CDS within pediatric epilepsy populations despite substantial risk factors inherent to the disorder and a large proportion of patients with comorbid ADHD. This study therefore describes CDS as reported by parents for a large sample of children with epilepsy. Relationship between epilepsy variables (e.g., number of antiepileptic drugs [AEDs], seizure frequency, seizure type) and CDS symptoms was explored. Additionally, considering the negative association between CDS and academic performance in other populations, the relationship between parentrated CDS and academic risk factors was examined.

Participants included 151 children with epilepsy (mean age = 11y, range 6-18y; 55% male; IQ>70), referred for outpatient neuropsychological assessment. As part of routine clinical care, parents completed the Penny Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Scale (SCT) and the Colorado Learning Difficulties Questionnaire (CLDQ). Scores and basic demographic information were extracted from an IRB approved clinical database; the IRB granted approval for retrospective chart review to extract additional medical variables. Parent report of CDS included total CDS score and three subdomains: Sleepy/Sluggish, Low Initiation, and Daydreamy. Higher scores represent greater parent-reported difficulties. Independent samples t-tests compared the participants’ means on total CDS and each subdomain to the normative sample. Analysis of variance was conducted to determine differential impact of seizure type (Generalized, Focal, or Multifocal) on total CDS and each subdomain. Correlations between other medical variables, scores on the CLDQ, and parent ratings on the SCT were examined.

Parents of children with epilepsy rated overall CDS total and subdomain scores as significantly higher compared to the normative means with highest elevation in symptoms of Low Initiation (p = <.001). Total CDS was associated with increased parent-reported academic difficulties; however, of the three subdomains, only Low Initiation was significantly associated with concerns for academic functioning. Number of AEDs was associated with increased symptoms on the Sleepy/Sluggish subdomain only. Seizure frequency was associated with total CDS and Sleepy/Sluggish symptoms, though this finding is likely mediated by increased number of AEDs for those with more frequent seizures. Seizure type was not associated with significant differences in Total CDS or CDS subdomains.

Children with epilepsy are at increased risk for experiencing slowed thinking and cognitive disengagement. Low initiation is particularly elevated in pediatric epilepsy populations, which may lead to increased academic difficulties. Potential interventions targeting low initiation may therefore have benefit in the academic setting for children with epilepsy, regardless of epilepsy type.

Teletesting has the potential to reduce numerous barriers to patient care which have only become exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although telehealth is commonly utilized throughout medicine and mental health practices, teletesting has remained limited within cognitive and academic evaluations. This may be largely due to concern for the validity of test administration via remote assessment. This cross-sectional study examined the equivalency of cognitive [Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children – Fifth Edition (WISC-V)] and academic [Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement – Third Edition (KTEA-3)] subtests administered via either teletesting or traditional in-person testing within clinically referred youth.

Chart review using a retrospective, cross-sectional design included a total of 893 children and adolescents, ranging from 4 to 17 years (Mean age = 10.2 years, SD = 2.9 years) who were administered at least one subtest from the aforementioned cognitive or academic assessments. Of these, 285 received teletesting, with the remaining (n = 608) receiving in-person assessment. A total of seven subtests (five from the WISC-V and two from the KTEA-3) were examined. A series of inverse probability of exposure weighted (IPEW) linear regression models examined differences between groups for each of the seven subtests after adjustment for numerous demographic, diagnostic, and parent-reported symptom variables.

Only two significant differences were found, such that WISC-V Visual Puzzles (p < .01) and KTEA-3 Math Concepts (p = .03) scores were slightly higher in the teletesting versus in-person groups. However, these differences were quite small in magnitude (WISC-V Visual Puzzles, d = .33, KTEA-3 Math Concepts, d = .18).

Findings indicate equivalency across methods of service delivery without clinically meaningful differences in scores among referred pediatric patients.