To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Continuous point-of-care patient monitoring is now the standard in emergency room and critical care settings, and the technology to produce small, affordable, safe bedside vital sign monitors is ubiquitous. The statistical methods to validate these emerging monitoring technologies, however, are in their infancy. Validation statistics have centered on the Bland–Altman method and cardiac output measurement, but this method fails to evaluate the ability of a device to reliably detect serial changes (trend analysis). Newer statistical methods such as concordance and polar plots have been developed to assess trending. Small-sized studies assessing within-subject trending require other statistical approaches. Since clinical validation studies must be of a sufficient standard to be used in evidence-based reviews, researchers assessing the value of emerging clinical monitoring technologies must have an understanding of these new statistical methodologies. They must also take into consideration the precision of the reference method and issues pertaining to setting the criteria for accepting a new monitoring method, particularly when using percentage error and the traditional <30% benchmark.