We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By
Keh-Ming Lin, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Research, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan,
Chun-Yu Chen, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Research National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan,
Chia-Hui Chen, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Research National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan,
Jur-Shan Cheng, Center for Health Policy Research and Development, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan,
Sheng-Chang Wang, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Research National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan
Critiques and reservations regarding the role and contribution of psychotropic agents in the care of psychiatric patients notwithstanding (Moncrieff, 2001; Healy, 2002), there is little doubt that the advent of modern psychopharmacology in the 1950s has vastly and profoundly altered the landscape of psychiatry. Phenothiazines and related compounds in the past half century have enabled millions of severely mentally ill patients to escape the fate of lifelong confinement. “Antidepressants” and mood stabilizers, equally serendipitously discovered around the same time, often effectively, and at times truly miraculously, lifted millions from various forms of misery. Together they also helped to change (albeit not fast enough and still a long way to go) the public's perception of the mentally ill as well as the professions charged with their care, helping to destigmatize behavioral and emotional problems. Irrespective of the extent of their therapeutic effects, the fact that simple chemical compounds could so profoundly alter behavior was itself inspiring for a new generation of scientists, who helped to usher in a new era of intensive research for the biological substrates of psychiatric phenomena, resulting in the blossoming of biological psychiatry and neuroscience in the last few decades (Carlsson, 1988; Bloom & Kupfer, 1995).
To be sure, examined at closer range, the effect of this “paradigm shift” on the profession and for society is far more complex and nuanced. Advances on the biological front not infrequently have been regarded as threats for our field's expertise in the psychosocial domains.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.