To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure email@example.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Hyperhidrosis is characterized by uncontrollable excessive sweating, which occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. As part of a wider study exploring the clinical and cost effectiveness of alternative treatments for primary hyperhidrosis, a survey of United Kingdom (UK) dermatologists was conducted to gain a better understanding of current clinical practice in the area and inform economic model inputs.
The survey was conducted by means of an online survey tool, “Qualtrics”. It was circulated to members of the British Association of Dermatologists. Topics covered included treatments typically administered, medication dosages prescribed, effectiveness of treatments, adverse events related to treatments and resource use associated with individual treatments.
Forty-five respondents from forty-two different dermatology units completed the survey. The majority of clinicians (83 percent) prescribed more than one medication - most commonly oxybutynin and propantheline bromide. The next most commonly reported treatments were: iontophoresis, botulinum toxin and curettage.
Respondents were asked to indicate dosage, frequency and details about follow-up visits related to medication use. Doses prescribed were largely consistent with British National Formulary (BNF) recommendations. For other treatments, dermatologists were asked to indicate duration of the procedure, job title of the treatment provider and details about monitoring visits. Results were similar to the findings from the literature and previously conducted interviews with clinicians.
Respondents were asked to indicate the dropout rates for each type of treatment due to lack of effectiveness and adverse events. Dropout rates were relatively high for both reasons.
The results highlight the wide range of treatments for hyperhidrosis currently administered by dermatologists across the UK, and the variation in current clinical practice. This variation highlights the lack of evidence-based guidance underpinning practice and the importance of clinical surveys as a complement to usual data collection methods.
Hyperhidrosis is characterized by uncontrollable excessive sweating, which occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. Symptoms can significantly affect quality of life. There is substantial variation in the secondary care treatment of hyperhidrosis and uncertainty regarding optimal patient management. The objective of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) was to review the evidence and establish the expected value of undertaking additional research into effective interventions for the management of primary hyperhidrosis in secondary care. Capturing the perspectives of patients and clinicians treating hyperhidrosis was an important part of the research.
The assessment included a systematic review and economic model, including value of information analysis. Patients, dermatologists, a vascular surgeon and a specialist nurse (who set up the UK Hyperhidrosis Support Group) provided advice at various stages, including at an end-of-project workshop, to help interpret results and prioritize research recommendations.
Patients and clinicians considered the key findings of the systematic review and economic analyses to be appropriate. Advisors advocated a trial of botulinum toxin injections (plus anaesthetic) versus iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Patients preferred the HydroQoL® tool over other commonly used quality of life tools in hyperhidrosis research.
Hyperhidrosis is characterized by uncontrollable excessive sweating, which occurs at rest, regardless of temperature, and can significantly affect quality of life. There is substantial variation in the availability of treatments in secondary care and uncertainty regarding optimal patient management. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the clinical effectiveness of treatments prescribed by dermatologists (iontophoresis, anticholinergic medications, botulinum toxin injections) and minor surgical treatments (curettage and newer energy based technologies) for primary hyperhidrosis and identify areas for further research.
Fifteen databases and trial registers were searched to July 2016. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for comparisons between botulinum toxin injections and placebo for axillary hyperhidrosis. For other treatments data were synthesised narratively due to limited and heterogeneous data.
Fifty studies were included in the review; thirty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), seventeen non-RCTs and one case series. There was substantial variation between the studies in terms of country of origin (indicating climate and population differences), interventions and methods of outcome assessment. Most studies were small, at high risk of bias and poorly reported. There was moderate quality evidence of a large statistically significant effect of botulinum toxin injections on axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms in the short to medium term (up to 16 weeks), compared with placebo. There was weak but consistent evidence for iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Evidence for other interventions was low or very low quality. Combining the evidence and patient advisor input, we established that further research on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections (with anesthesia) versus iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis would be useful.
The evidence for the effectiveness and safety of treatments for primary hyperhidrosis is limited overall and few firm conclusions can be drawn. However, there is moderate quality evidence to support the use of botulinum toxin injections for axillary hyperhidrosis. A trial comparing botulinum toxin injections with iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis is warranted.
Primary hyperhidrosis has no discernible cause and is characterised by uncontrollable excessive and unpredictable sweating, which occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. The symptoms of hyperhidrosis can significantly affect quality of life, and can lead to social embarrassment, loneliness, anxiety and depression.
The aim of this literature review was to identify the tools used to measure quality of life in studies of hyperhidrosis. Patient advisors provided insight and their perspective.
Studies were identified through searches undertaken in January 2016. The search strategies combined topic terms for hyperhidrosis with a recognised search filter for “quality of life”. All studies that reported measuring quality of life or described a quality of life measure/tool in the context of primary hyperhidrosis were included. The information on the tools and their use in hyperhidrosis was summarized in a narrative synthesis. Patient advisors contributed to the interpretation of the findings.