We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
from
Part IV
-
Policy design and decisionmaking under uncertainty
By
Klaus Keller, 208 Deike Building Department of Geosciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA,
Seung-Rae Kim, Woodrow Wilson School and Department of Economics Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544, USA,
Johanna Baehr, 208 Deike Building Department of Geosciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA,
David F. Bradford, 208 Deike Building Department of Geosciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA,
Michael Oppenheimer, Department of Geosciences Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
The field of integrated assessment of climate change is undergoing a paradigm shift towards the analysis of potentially abrupt and irreversible climate changes (Alley et al., 2003; Keller et al., 2007). Early integrated studies broke important new ground in exploring the relationship between the costs and benefits of reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (e.g., Nordhaus, 1991; Manne and Richels, 1991; or Tol, 1997). These studies project the climate response to anthropogenic CO2 emissions to be relatively smooth and typically conclude that the projected benefits of reducing CO2 emissions would justify only small reductions in CO2 emissions in a cost–benefit framework. The validity of the often- assumed smooth climate response is, however, questionable, given how the climate system has responded to forcing in the geological past. Before the Anthropocene, the geological time period where humans have started to influence the global biogeochemical cycles considerably (Crutzen, 2002), the predominant responses of the climate system were forced by small changes in solar insolation occurring on timescales of thousands of years (Berger and Loutre, 1991). Yet this slow and smooth forcing apparently triggered abrupt climate changes – a threshold response where the climate system moved between different basins of attraction (Berger, 1990; Clement et al., 2001). Anthropogenic forcing may trigger climate threshold responses in the future (Alley et al., 2003; Keller et al., 2007).
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.