We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines the early evolution of Peruzzi’s own wall-painting and architectural decoration, including the St Helena Chapel in S. Croce in Gerusalemme, Rome, the Castello in Ostia, and the first of his frescoes for the Farnesina itself, in the Sala or Stanza del Fregio (‘the room of the frieze’). It will also review the influences studied in Chapter 1, from Peruzzi’s earliest work in Siena cathedral, comparing his innovations with those of Pinturicchio and the young Raphael. I see the Farnesina frieze as a pivotal work for Peruzzi, synthesising earlier study of antiquities (some close at hand) and looking forward to the more public astrological vault. Most observers stress the difference between these two projects, one intimate, animated and softly lit, the other bright, ‘cold and pale’, formal and stylised as befits its official function of proclaiming the patron’s destiny (n. 59 in this chapter). Here, in contrast, I will suggest affinities between them.
Peruzzi’s next figurative project after the Stanza del Fregio was to decorate the exterior of the new villa. This astonishingly ambitious design task involved not only the three-dimensional elements that still variegate the plain façade – austere pilasters and window-cases, topped by the spectacular cornicione or ‘great cornice’ with its acanthus brackets above a frieze of swags and putti moulded in stucco – but paintings that gave the illusion of sculptures and reliefs. The eyewitness Vasari, in the passage cited as my first epigraph, thought that the grace and natural beauty of Peruzzi’s architecture owed much to its being ‘adorned on the outside’ with storie or ‘histories’ by his own hand, some of them ‘molto belle’ (iv.318). We will see that Peruzzi himself called such narrative panels ‘Istorie’ and confronted the problem of ‘accommodating’ them to architecture.
Latin poems by Egidio Gallo and Blosio Palladio, set within a cluster of other verses, literary allusions and archival documents, let us grasp what might have been seen before the villa was complete, and how Chigi’s circle imagined his projected works. Using lost material brought to light in Chapter 3, plus legal records, visitors’ accounts of the building, overlooked details from sixteenth-century views of Rome, and neglected evidence still on the grounds, this chapter will correlate extant remains and poetic tributes, building an extensive picture of the estate as a multiplicity of buildings integrated into the landscape garden. Common themes unite painting, sculpture, architecture and topography. I recognise literary conventions and hyperboles, but I also argue for considerable insight and visual acuity in these authors; Blosio was so impressed that he later asked Peruzzi to design his own town house and the gardens of his ambitious villa, where he commissioned frescoes that echo the exterior paintings of the Farnesina – some of them still in situ (Figs. 4.1, 4.2).
Who needs another book on the Farnesina? No secular building typifies the Italian High Renaissance better than this villa established on the bank of the Tiber by the outrageously wealthy Papal banker Agostino Chigi (1466–1520). With its innovative architecture by Baldassare Peruzzi, brilliant frescoes by Peruzzi himself, Sebastiano del Piombo, Sodoma and Raphael – culminating in the tale of Psyche designed by Raphael and painted by his talented team of artists including Giulio Romano and Giovanni da Udine – it has been thoroughly studied and documented. Already in 1512, a French diplomat called it ‘the most beautiful and rich thing I have ever seen’, anticipating Goethe’s declaration that no more beautiful works of decorative art existed. Every survey of Renaissance art and every study of those individual artists includes a passage on the Farnesina (a nickname given long after the Farnese had bought the property, more correctly known as the Villa Chigi or ‘Palazzo Agostino Chigi’). Distinguished architects record it in their sketchbooks (Fig. I.1).
Most of the Farnesina’s canonical wall paintings – Peruzzi’s illusionistic salone or Sala delle Prospettive, Sodoma’s Roxana and Alexander in the nuptial bedroom, and the story of Psyche by Raphael and his team – are the product of a distinct second phase of remodelling and decoration, not conceived from the start but put in motion when Agostino Chigi decided, by marrying, to legitimise his concubine Francesca and their children (the firstborn, Alessandro, suggesting the theme of Alexander the Great). Together with Raphael’s Galatea these frescoes became the focus of future visitors, artists, connoisseurs and art historians for centuries. In this sense they need no introduction, or at least no elaborate reconstruction and exposition. This concluding chapter will emphasise aspects of these all-too-familiar painted rooms that are freshly illuminated by the discoveries made earlier in the book. The ‘new sensibility towards the natural world’ embodied in the loggias generated new ‘fictive landscapes’ (Ch. 4 n. 65). Venus myths initiated in Peruzzi’s external paintings and astrological vault, and further explored by the house poets, continue to influence these new developments later in the decade.
Hints for the genesis of the Farnesina may be found in ancient and Renaissance literature, in earlier projects commissioned by Agostino Chigi and his family, and in Peruzzi’s own development. This opening chapter traces the influences, ancient and modern, that converged to form the precocious architect-painter, within the larger context of Chigi patronage (in Siena and Rome) and the cultural ambitions that made Agostino distinctive. As Nicholas Adams remarks, ‘the villa is a compact encyclopedia of antique references and motifs on the theme of pleasure and fame’, Peruzzi being ‘an artist and architect of great erudition, without equal as a draughtsman and noted for his extraordinary studies of antique buildings’. Section 1 accordingly starts by characterising Peruzzi’s relation to Antiquity, showing how he augmented those studies with the precepts of Vitruvius and ancient accounts of the ‘voluptuous’ villa, notably those by the poet Statius. Elements from many sources combine to create a unique synthesis of villa, palace, office and theatre, already announced in the stage set of the entry façade (Fig. 1.1, an invaluable sixteenth-century architect’s drawing, now in New York).
The frescoes of Peruzzi, Raphael and Sodoma still dazzle visitors to the Villa Farnesina, but they survive in a stripped-down environment bereft of its landscape, sealed so it cannot breathe. Turner takes you outside that box, restoring these canonical images to their original context, when each element joined in a productive conversation. He is the first to reconstruct the architect-painter Peruzzi's original, well-proportioned, well-appointed building and to re-visualize his lost façade decoration‒erotic scenes and mythological figures who make it come alive and soar upward. More comprehensively than any previous scholar, he reintegrates painting, sculpture, architecture, garden design, topographical prints and drawings, archaeological discoveries and literature from the brilliant circle around the patron Agostino Chigi, the powerful banker who 'loved all virtuosi' and commissioned his villa-palazzo from the best talents in multiple arts. It can now be understood as a Palace of Venus, celebrating aesthetic, social and erotic pleasure.
“though I am not the only person in Sussex who reads Milton,” wrote Virginia Woolf in a famous diary entry of September 1918,
I mean to write down my impressions of Paradise Lost while I am about it. Impressions fairly well describes the sort of thing left in my mind. I have left many riddles unread. I have slipped on too easily to taste the full flavour … I am struck by the extreme difference between this poem & any other. It lies, I think, in the sublime aloofness & impersonality of the emotion. [Milton] deals in horror & immensity & squalor & sublimity, but never in the passions of the human heart. Has any great poem ever let in so little light upon ones own joys and sorrows? I get no help in judging life; I scarcely feel that Milton lived or knew men & women; except for the peevish personalities about marriage & the woman's duties. He was the first of the masculinists: but his disparagement rises from his own ill luck & seems even a spiteful last word in his domestic quarrels. But how smooth, strong & elaborate it all is! What poetry! … The inexpressible fineness of the style, in which shade after shade is perceptible, would alone keep one gazing in to it, long after the surface business in progress has been despatched. Deep down one catches still further combinations, rejections, felicities, & masteries.