We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In 2013, 36 Ancestors of African descent were identified in an unmarked eighteenth-century burial ground during construction in Charleston, South Carolina. The site, later referred to as the Anson Street African Burial Ground, was buried beneath the growing city and forgotten in the centuries that followed. The ethical treatment of these ancestral remains was of paramount importance to our community. Historically, narratives relating to the lives of African descendant people in Charleston have been inadequately documented and shared. For these reasons, we engaged the local African American community in a multifaceted memorialization process. Together, we sought to sensitively ensure that the Ancestors’ identities and lives were fully explored according to the collective descendant community's wishes. To this end, we involved the community in researching and celebrating the Ancestors’ lives through arts and education programs and analyzed their and community members’ DNA to elucidate their ancestry. Our engagement initiatives increased access for all ages to archaeological, historical, and genetic research and encouraged active participation in the design of a permanent memorial. The Anson Street African Burial Ground Project provides a successful example of community-engaged activist archaeology focused on honoring the Ancestors and their descendants.
These two account rolls for the Augustinian houses of Newnham and Harrold were preserved with the documents of the Boteler family, who at the dissolution of the monasteries obtained some of the property concerned.
The Newnham roll, 1519-20.
The first is that of the cellarer for Newnham. It follows the usual form: charge; allowance; and remains (receipts, expenditure and balance).
The charge is of three kinds: the balance from the year before called “the old remains” or in this roll “the arrears”; regular receipts, which should not vary much and are checked with the terrier (schedule of property); casual and variable receipts. In the original roll the various separate sums in the charge are repeated in the lefthand margin; while the totals are given on the right. This double entry probably facilitated checking, but there is in fact an error under income of St. Paul’s church. The roll is less detailed than such of the terriers as have survived, and the amounts given under similar headings are often different in the terrier and the account.
The allowance consists of regular and casual payments; this also has two mistakes.
The roll gives the date of the installation of John Asshewell as prior. He is also named in a deed of 20 August 1515 which grants certain commonable rights to the corporation of Bedford.
John Salpho was cellarer for some years, and is mentioned by George Joye as “your brother celerar called Johan Berde or Johan Salpho, a man of lyke learnyng, and coulde beter skyl in makyng of a pease cake then in alledgyng of Holy Scrypture”. Joye’s Letters relate to 1527 or shortly before, and the volume was printed at Strassburg about 1535.
John Heaven was a relative of a family of yeomen settled at Minchinhampton in Gloucestershire, born in 1723, pursued the trade of a turner on the Bedford Charity estate in Holborn, joined the Moravians in 1748, was elected a freeman of Bedford in 1759, common councilman and burgess in 1767 (when he took the Test), mayor for the year beginning at Michaelmas 1768, became receiver of the Charity estates in 1787, and died in 1794.
The custom of Bedford then was that anybody who had once served as mayor was an aiderman for life unless he left the town; the common council consisted of the mayor, aldermen and bailiffs (called the court of aldermen) and 13 common council-men, sitting together; the mayor and bailiffs were elected by all the freemen at a meeting called a common hall from six candidates, three named by the court of aldermen and three by the thirteen; and the thirteen were similarly elected at a second common hall, from 26 freemen named by the court of aldermen. The common halls were held on the first Monday in September and the Wednesday before St. Matthew’s Day, and the persons so elected came into office on Michaelmas Day.
This method made it easy for any political party, once it had a majority in the court of aldermen, to control the council by nominating only their own partisans for mayor or bailiffs and to the thirteen, when the thirteen could also nominate members of the same party. The corporation were trustees of one or two small charities and had a majority on the board of the recently enriched Bedford Charity and so had considerable patronage, and also were able to create enough freemen to ensure a majority at a parliamentary election. The fluid nature of party politics in the 18th century and the desirability of keeping on good terms with the recorder (who might belong to the ousted party, and considered himself entitled to dispose of one of the borough seats), kept this system short of that perfection which it might be thought to have attained, but another custom, informally observed, sometimes gave the opposition an unexpected victory which might last for years.
Contains 'The Meeting-place of Wixamtree Hundred', by F. W. Marsom. 'Newnham Priory: A Bedford Rental, 1506-7', by W. N. Henman. 'Newnham Priory: Rental of Manor at Biddenham, 1505-6', by Barbara Cook. 'The Papers of Richard Taylor of Clapham (c. 1579-1641)', by G. D. Gilmore. 'John Crook, 1617-1699: A Bedfordshire Quaker', by H. G. Tibbutt. 'A Bedfordshire Wage Assessment of 1684', by T. S. Willan. 'A Luton Baptist Minute Book, 1707-1806', by C. E. Freeman.
The Black Book of Bedford, as the title page informs us, was begun in November 1562. It is a parchment volume, 10½ x 14 in., in which are entered three sets of constitutions or byelaws, certain Corporation oaths, and a large number of fines taken in the Bedford Court of Pleas during the 17th century; a few deeds are enrolled also. The first set of constitutions is given here.
These seem to have been made between 1562 or earlier and 1603. No. 16 speaks of the Feast of the Nativity next “videlicet in anno domini 1565”; the Court Leet at which constitutions were made was held usually in August and December, and this particular constitution therefore should have been made three years after the book was begun. No. 17 refers to prisoners committed to the Bridge House; the Bridge House was originally a chapel dedicated to St. Thomas, and was not used as a prison before 1589. This leaves a gap of nearly 24 years between two successive byelaws. No. 36 uses the expression “King’s highway,” instead of “Queen’s highway” as was usual during the reign of Elizabeth, and should therefore not be earlier than 1603.
It is clear from the Leet book beginning August 1586 that at this time the Leet juries used another series than ours, the constitutions referred to in that volume being numbered up to 70 and above, although our series ends with 50. A constitution against canvassing at elections is an example of one recorded in the Leet book but not entered in the Black Book. Further, on 18 December 1598 the burgess jury desired that there might be a book of parchment made wherein all the constitutions in force might be written fairly, although the Black Book was already in existence. Finally, on 13 December 1602 they desired that those constitutions which lately had been perused and agreed upon might be confirmed and engrossed in the Black Book, and all other constitutions to be void. This was done after the next Leet, 15 August 1603, and thereafter for the short remainder of this Leet volume the numbers of the constitutions given in the presentments agree with the numbers in the Black Book.
Among the muniments of the Corporation of Bedford are preserved some papers of Richard Taylor of Clapham, burgess, justice of the peace, and deputy recorder of Bedford, and member of parliament in the reign of Charles I. It may be convenient to give some account of Taylor’s family and career as a preliminary to these.
THE TAYLOR FAMILY
The Visitation of 1634 gives Lidlington as the place of origin of the family, and its founder as Thomas, Richard’s grandfather, who is credited with partly rebuilding Lidlington church. Thomas Julyan alias Taylor, yeoman, bought Grymsbury in Bolnhurst in 1579 and left it to his second son, Thomas. Thomas left directions that Grymsbury should be assigned to his son Richard at the age of 21, and this was done in 1600. Richard thus seems to have been born in 1579. It was also in 1600 that Richard Taylor was admitted to Lincoln’s Inn. On 12 August 1613 he married Elizabeth, daughter of William and Ursula Boteler of Biddenham. He was one of the borough members in the parliaments of 1620, 1623, 1625 and 1628; during the whole of which time he was deputy recorder for Bedford.7 He is named in two Bedford commissions of the peace, one undated, the other 15 Charles I, besides being also in the commission for the county.
In 1626 Charles I, having dismissed his second parliament before subsidies had been passed, tried to obtain money by demands for free gifts and loans addressed to his principal subjects, and “our trustie and welbeloved Mr. Taylor of the towne of Bedford” received a demand for £50 dated 14 August 1626. He seems also to have taken the lead at a general meeting on 17 August called to raise more money for the king; of his speech for this meeting notes remain, and there is also a vivid description of the gathering among his papers. It is clear that among these growing signs of storm his sympathies were already Royalist.
Meanwhile his own position was becoming more assured. In 1624 he had received a grant of arms (ermine, on a chief dancettee sable, a ducal coronet or, between two escallops argent).
Background: Studies of deep brain stimulation (DBS) require accurate electrode localization and image registration. We used anatomical fiducials to investigate localization and registration errors in patients who underwent subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS for PD. Pre and post operative MRI scans were non-linearly normalized to a standard template (MNI152NLin2009bAsym). Four raters localized DBS electrodes (Lead-DBS), the anterior commissure (AC) and posterior commissure (PC). Errors between rater localizations were calculated (fiducial localization error; FLE). We transformed AC and PC coordinates from template to patient space to calculate the fiducial registration error (FRE)Results: Ninety-nine patients were analyzed, with a median FLE of 0.76mm, 0.74mm, 0.71mm and 0.66mm for the right electrode, left electrode, AC and PC respectively (no significant difference, Wilcoxon sign rank). The median FRE was 1.59mm for AC and 1.21mm for PC, significantly higher than FLE at those coordinates (Wilcoxon sign rank, p<0.001). Conclusions: Raters can accurately localize DBS electrodes, AC and PC from clinical images with sub-millimetric accuracy. Higher FREs at AC and PC suggested registration errors may contribute more than localization errors to electrode uncertainty in a common space.
Background: Therapeutic response from subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) has been associated with proximity to an ideal target, commonly in the dorsal sensorimotor STN. Automated registration and atlas-based segmentation has allowed for contact localization within STN subnuclei. We sought to apply these methods to characterize the spatial distribution of our active contact placements. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 55 patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS for PD. Post-operative CT/MRI scans were non-linearly registered into a standard space, and DBS-electrodes were localized using Lead-DBS. 3-dimensional meshes from a segmented atlas (Ewert 2017) were utilized. Analysis was performed in MATLAB R2019b. Results: Mean active contacts were within sensorimotor STN bilaterally, located posteroinferiorly compared to reported ideal targets. Centroids fell within (left/right): sensorimotor (46%/40%), associative (22%/22%), limbic (0%/2%) and outside STN (32%/36%). Principal components analysis demonstrated most spatial variance is explained by the first component (left 65.8%, right 61.9%). Conclusions: We obtained contact locations in relation to STN subnuclei, allowing for an anatomically guided approach to our analysis. 66% of the active contacts were located within the STN, and most of the spatial variation occurred along a single dimension. Future directions include utilizing subnuclei localizations to investigate clinical outcomes.
Background: Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are known as epilepsy biomarkers for seizure detection, and It is essential for clinicians to detect them from from physiological events with similar temporal frequency characteristics. Methods: We analyzed the SEEG recordings obtained from patients with medically-resistant epilepsy (MRE) implanted with DE at the Western University Hospital Epilepsy Unit. The data were cleaned, denoised, montaged and segmented based on the clinical annotations, such as sleep intervals and observed Ictals. For event detection, the signal waveform and its power were extracted symmetrically in non-overlapping intervals of 500 ms. Each waveform’s power across all detected spikes was computed and clustered based on their energy distributions. Results: The recordings included thirteen sessions of 24 hours of extracellular recordings from two patients, with 312 hours extracted from four hippocampus electrodes anterior and posterior hippocampus. Our results indicate IEDs carrying the most different characteristics in the bands [25-75] Hz; SWR, on the other hand, are distributed between [80-170] Hz. Conclusions: Our algorithm detected and successfully distinguished IED from SWRs based on their carrying energy during non-sleep periods. Also, the most powerful spectral features that they were distinguished from occur in [15-30] Hz and [75-90] Hz.
Background: Establishing spatial correspondence between subject and template images is necessary in neuroimaging research and clinical applications. A point-based set of anatomical fiducials (AFIDs) was recently developed and validated to provide quantitative measures of image registration. We applied the AFIDs protocol to magnetic resonance images (MRIs) obtained from patients with Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Methods: Two expert and three novice raters placed AFIDs on MRIs of 39 PD patients. Localization and registration errors were calculated. To investigate for unique morphometric features, pairwise distances between AFIDs were calculated and compared to 30 controls who previously had AFIDs placed. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Bonferroni corrections were used. Results: 6240 AFIDs were placed with a mean localization error (±SD) of 1.57mm±1.16mm and mean registration error of 3.34mm±1.94mm. Out of the 496 pairwise distances, 40 were statistically significant (p<0.05/496). PD patients had a decreased pairwise distance between the left temporal horn, brainstem and pineal gland. Conclusions: AFIDs can be successfully applied with millimetric accuracy in a clinical setting and utilized to provide localized and quantitative measures of registration error. AFIDs provide clinicians and researchers with a common, open framework for quality control and validation of spatial correspondence, facilitating accurate aggregation of imaging datasets and comparisons between various neurological conditions.
Background: The zona incerta (ZI) is a small structure in the deep brain first identified by Auguste Forel for which robust in vivo visualization has remained elusive. The increased inherent signal from ultra-high field (7-Tesla or greater; 7T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) presents an opportunity to see structures not previously visible. In this study, we investigated the possibility of using quantitative T1 mapping at 7T to visualize the ZI region. Methods: We recruited healthy participants (N=32) and patients being considered for deep brain stimulation therapy as part of a prospective imaging study at 7T. Computational methods were used to process and fuse images to produce a high-resolution group average from which ZI anatomy could be delineated. Results: We pooled 7T data using image fusion methods and found that the contrast from quantitative T1 mapping was strikingly similar to classic histological staining, permitting facile identification of the ZI and nearby structures in reference to conventional stereotactic atlases. Conclusions: Using computational neuroimaging techniques, we demonstrate for the first time that the ZI is visible in vivo. Furthermore, we determined that this nuclear region can be decoupled from surrounding fibre pathways. This work paves the way for more accurate patient-specific optimization of deep brain targets for neuromodulation.
A medical information commons (MIC) is a networked data environment utilized for research and clinical applications. At three deliberations across the U.S., we engaged 75 adults in two-day facilitated discussions on the ethical and social issues inherent to sharing data with an MIC. Deliberants made recommendations regarding opt-in consent, transparent data policies, public representation on MIC governing boards, and strict data security and privacy protection. Community engagement is critical to earning the public's trust.
Local attitudes towards carnivores often reflect the degree of damage they are perceived to cause. Consequently, understanding the interactions between people and these species is essential to conservation efforts. This study investigated local perceptions of three Cerrado canid species and current chicken management practices, to identify the potential damage they cause and how this relates to peoples’ attitudes towards these species. Results from structured interviews at 50 ranches in Goiás, Brazil, highlighted that general knowledge about Cerrado canids differed significantly by species, with interviewees unable to correctly answer questions about the hoary fox Lycalopex vetulus and crab-eating fox Cerdocyon thous in comparison to the maned wolf Chrysocyon brachyurus. Chicken coops were identified as the most effective method for preventing predation, yet only 44% of respondents employed this method. Using a perceived predation measure, interviewees reported chicken predation by all three Cerrado canids even though most of these events were stated to occur during the day, outside the species’ active periods. Reported predation events were a strong predictor of attitude. Participants who experienced predation events reported they did not like having a Cerrado canid on their property. However, 86% of the respondents agreed that Cerrado canids should nevertheless be protected. Our findings support the need to incorporate the human dimension in canid and broader carnivore conservation issues.