OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The primary objective is to measure the independent association of hospital-level and sociodemographic variables on the rate of hospital-onset bacteremia among infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit in a United States of America retrospective cohort. The secondary outcome will be relative blood culture collection rate. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The study is an analysis of a retrospective cohort comprised of infants admitted to 322 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States of America between 2016-2021. The primary outcome will be hospital-onset bacteremia (HOB), defined as a positive blood culture with a bacteria or fungi after day 3 of admission. Independent risk factors will include birthweight, postnatal age, central venous catheter presence, sociodemographic variables (race, ethnicity, insurance status and ZIP code-level demographic data from the US Census American Community Survey (ACS), and hospital-level variables. Infants will be stratified by sociodemographic groups and a Poisson model will be utilized to measure the adjusted association between risk of HOB and clinical and hospital-level variables. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: I anticipate that infants in sociodemographic groups with a history of socioeconomic marginalization will have a higher unadjusted rate of HOB; however, sociodemographic variables will not be independently associated with HOB risk after adjusting for markers of hospital quality and acuity, such as quartiles of the following: mean admissions per year, percentage of infants born <1500g, annual blood culture contamination rate, and percentage infants born at another facility. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Neonatal bacteremia has high morbidity and mortality; however, its contribution to known infant mortality inequities is unknown. This study will estimate the burden of infant HOB stratified by sociodemographic groups and measure the independent association of sociodemographic and hospital-level variables on the adjusted rate of HOB.

Background: Prevention of hospital-onset bacteremia (HOB) in all settings is a healthcare priority. The CDC is developing a neonatal-specific HOB quality metric, but the epidemiology of neonatal HOB is poorly understood. Our objective was to validate a prior single-center finding that HOB risk varies by birthweight and postnatal age in a multicenter cohort. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of neonates admitted to 4 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) for ≥4 days between July 1, 2016, and July 1, 2021. HOB was defined as a positive blood culture for bacteria or fungi on day ≥4 of admission. The first HOB event in the hospitalization was counted per neonate. Repeat HOB events during a neonate’s admission were excluded. Poisson regression models with robust variance estimates were used to estimate the incidence rate (IR) of HOB, expressed as HOB events per 1,000 patient days and IR ratios (IRRs), within strata defined by CDC birthweight categories and 4-week postnatal age intervals, adjusting for central venous catheter (CVC) presence at time of HOB and study site. Results: The analysis included 9,267 neonates, contributing 191,295 patient days and 470 HOB events, with an unadjusted IR of 2.46 per 1,000 patient days (Table 1). Of 477 infants born ≤750 g, 153 (30.1%) had a HOB with an IR of 13.3 (95% CI, 10.5–16.0) events per 1,000 patient days in the first 4 weeks after birth (Fig. 1). After adjusting for CVC presence and study site, infants ≤750 g had a higher HOB rate in the first 4 weeks of life (IRR, 7.45; 95% CI, 3.81–14.56) compared to infants ≥2,500 g. After 8 weeks of life, there was no difference in HOB rate in the 2 groups (IRR, 0.8, 95% CI, 0.3–2.7). Conclusions: Neonates born ≤750 g were at highest risk for HOB within the first 4 weeks after birth; however, risk for HOB was not consistent over time. Postnatal age should be considered in a neonatal HOB quality metric.

Disclosures: None

Background: Respiratory cultures are commonly obtained from patients with suspicion for ventilator-associated infections (VAIs). In the absence of specimen ordering and collection guidelines, management practices may differ. We characterized current respiratory culture collection practices and perceptions and identified potential barriers to changing practices among a national collaborative of pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Methods: We conducted an electronic survey of PICU physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), respiratory therapists (RTs), and nurses at 16 US academic pediatric hospitals across the United States. Positive Likert-scale responses (eg, “agree” and “strongly agree”) were grouped. To account for varying hospital representation, we analyzed the results as the median proportion of participants with that response across the hospitals. Results: After excluding incomplete responses, 568 (44%) of 1,301 invited participants responded (range, 16–107 per site); the median hospital response rate was 60% (range, 17%–83%). Roles included physicians (35%), APPs (10%), RTs (24%), and nurses (31%). Moreover, 44% of the participating units cared for cardiac surgery patients. Across hospitals, specimens are often collected by RTs, followed by nurses, typically via inline endotracheal aspirate for either endotracheal tubes or tracheostomies. Saline lavage is a common practice, but only 4% reported a standardized approach. Examining the likeliness to obtain cultures for different clinical symptoms, the widest variation in responses were for fever and inflammatory markers without respiratory symptoms (median proportion, 68%; IQR, 54%–79%), isolated change in secretion characteristics (67%; IQR, 54%–78%), isolated increased secretions (55%; IQR, 40%–65%), isolated inflammatory markers (49%; IQR, 38%–57%) or isolated fever (49%; IQR, 38%–61%). Overall, 75% (IQR, 70%–86%) of reported respiratory cultures were likely to be obtained as a “pan culture.” Most respondents (median proportion, 69%) felt confident about the indications to obtain cultures, but 60% felt that clinicians had a low threshold, and 84% reported clinical practice variation. Barriers to change included reluctance to change (70%), opinion of consultants (64%), and fear of missing a diagnosis of VAI (62%). Respondents agreed that they would find clinical decision support (CDS) tools helpful (79%). In addition, 83% expected that they would follow CDS, and 82% thought that CDS would help align ICU and/or consulting teams. Conclusions: Among 16 participating hospitals, we detected a lack of standardized respiratory-culture specimen collection and ordering practices. Most respondents agreed that CDS tools would be helpful. Diagnostic stewardship of respiratory cultures using CDS must account for potential reluctance to change and needs to address stakeholder perspectives, including fear of missing infections.

Disclosure: None

In a large healthcare worker cohort, we quantified the association between behaviors and risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during different pandemic phases, adjusting for prior infection and vaccination. Individual characteristics, including personal concerns, were associated with these behaviors. Public health messaging should target high-risk populations and behaviors as the pandemic evolves.

Group Name: Bright STAR Authorship Group

Background: Blood cultures are fundamental in the diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. Culture practices vary widely, and overuse can lead to false-positive results and unnecessary antibiotics. Our objective was to describe the implementation of a multisite quality improvement collaborative to reduce unnecessary blood cultures in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients, and its 18-month impact on blood culture rates and safety metrics. Methods: In 2018, 14 PICUs joined the Blood Culture Improvement Guidelines and Diagnostic Stewardship for Antibiotic Reduction in Critically Ill Children (Bright STAR) Collaborative, designed to understand and improve blood culture practices in critically ill children. Guided by a centralized multidisciplinary study team, sites first reviewed existing evidence for safe reduction of unnecessary blood cultures and assessed local practices and barriers to change. Subsequently, local champions developed and implemented clinical decision-support tools informed by local patient needs to guide new blood-culture practices. The coordinating study team facilitated regular evaluations and discussions of project progress through monthly phone calls, site visits if requested by sites or the study team, and collaborative-wide teleconferences. The study team collected monthly blood culture rates and monitored for possible delays in obtaining blood cultures using a standardized review process as a safety balancing metric. We compared 24 months of baseline data to 18 months of postimplementation using a Poisson regression model accounting for the site-specific patient days and correlation of culture use within a site over time. Results: Across the 14 sites, before implementation, 41,768 blood cultures were collected over 259,701 PICU patient days. The mean preimplementation site-specific blood culture rate was 15.7 cultures per 100 patient days (rate range, 9.6–48.2 cultures per 100 patient days). After implementation, 22,397 blood cultures were collected over 208,171 PICU patient days. The mean postimplementation rate was 10.4 cultures per 100 patient days (rate range, 4.7–28.3 cultures per 100 patient days), which was 33.6% lower than the preimplementation (relative rate 0.66; 95% CI, 0.65–0.68 p <0.01). In 18 months post-implementation, sites reviewed 793 positive blood cultures, and identified only one suspected delay in culture collection possibly attributable to the site’s blood culture reduction program. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary quality improvement teams safely facilitated a 33.6% average reduction in blood culture use in critically ill children at 14 hospitals. Future collaborative work will determine the impact of blood culture diagnostic stewardship on antibiotic use and other important patient safety outcomes.

Funding: No

Disclosures: None

Figure 1.

Background:Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the second most common cause of healthcare-acquired infections in neonates. S. aureus colonization is a known risk factor for invasive disease. Aside from healthcare workers (HCWs), recent data suggest that parents are important reservoirs of S. aureus in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). S. aureus typically colonizes the nares, but it can also colonize other anatomic locations such as the throat. Objective: Our objectives were to identify and compare S. aureus colonization among HCWs and parents and to identify and compare different sites of S. aureus colonization. Methods: Between April 2015 and July 2016, we performed 4 point-prevalence surveys and collected nares and throat swabs from HCWs (nurses, respiratory therapists, nurse practitioners, and physicians) at a quaternary-care NICU. During an overlapping period, we screened parents of neonates in the NICU for S. aureus colonization using nares, throat, groin, and perianal cultures as a part of an ongoing randomized control trial. Cultures from both studies were collected using standardized methods. ESwabs were used to collect samples, which were inoculated into broth for enrichment and subsequently cultured onto chromogenic agar to differentiate between MSSA and MRSA. Results: The prevalence of methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) colonization was 46% (105/226) in HCWs and 28% (239/842) in parents. The prevalence of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) colonization was 2.2% (5/226) in HCWs and 2.2% (19/842) in parents. Of those who were colonized with S. aureus, 35% (79/226) of HCWs and 46.5% (160/344) of parents had nares and throat colonization while 11.5% (26/226) of HCWs and 12.2% (42/344) of parents had only throat colonization but not nares colonization. Of those who were MRSA colonized, 1.3% (3/226) of HCWs and 1.8% (15/842) of parents had a positive nares and throat culture as compared to 0.9% (2/226) of HCWs and 0.2% (2/842) of parents had only positive throat cultures. Additionally, 68% (175/257) were colonized with S. aureus at any swabbed site including nares, throat, groin, or perinanal areas. However, only 30% (77/257) of parents had only nares colonization as compared to 58.8% (151/257) had throat and nares colonization, 38.1% (98/257) had nares and groin colonization, and 37.4% (96/257) had nares and perianal colonization. Conclusions: HCWs had greater prevalence of S. aureus colonization compared to parents. As expected, the nares was the most common site of MSSA and MRSA, but a large proportion of S. aureus colonized HCWs and parents had only throat colonization. Given the prevalence of S. aureus in non-nares sites of HCWs and parents in the NICU, further studies should examine the role of non-nares carriers in the transmission of S. aureus in this population.

Funding: None

Disclosures: Aaron Milstone reports consultancy with Becton Dickinson.