We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
The Late Holocene Dry Period (LHDP) was a one-plus millennial megadrought (3100–1800 cal BP) that delivered challenges and windfalls to Indigenous communities of the central Great Basin (United States). New pollen and sedimentation rate studies, combined with existing tree-ring data, submerged stump ages, and lake-level evidence, demonstrate that the LHDP was the driest Great Basin climate within the last 6,000 years—more extreme than the well-known Medieval Climatic Anomaly. New evidence reported here documents that most Great Basin archaeological sites south of 40° N latitude were abandoned during the long dry phase of the LHDP (3100–2200 cal BP), sometimes reoccupied during a wet interval (2200–2000 cal BP), and abandoned again during the most extreme drought (2000–1800 cal BP). Even in the face of epic drought, this is a story of remarkable survivance by some people who adjusted to their drought-stricken landscape where they had lived for millennia. Some moved on, but other resilient foragers refused to abandon their homeland, taking advantage of glacier-fed mountain springs with cooler alpine temperatures and greater moisture retention at high altitude, a result of early Neoglaciation conditions across many Great Basin ranges, despite epic drought conditions in the lowlands.
Current scholarship suggests that Neo-Eneolithic systems of settlement and subsistence in Eastern Europe were defined by short-to-medium range migration, while sparsely populated land in peripheral regions allowed for the continual colonization of new territories. We address the Eastern Tripolye Culture (ETC), a sub-group of the Cucuteni-Tripolye cultural complex that flourished ca. 4300–2950 BC by expanding into the forest-steppe ecozone of Central Ukraine. While a general lack of multi-layer sites complicates regional chronology, we resolve several longstanding questions in Ukrainian archaeological discourse by combining traditional relative chronologies of ceramic types with high-precision AMS dating of material from key sites. We offer a revision of the chronology of Tripolye BI and BI-II, which, rather than consisting of distinct “early” and “late” temporal periods, instead constitute a single period characterized by stylistic diversity in material culture. With an absolute chronology established, we then analyze the space-time distribution of sites, revealing a southwest-to-northeast migratory vector across Central Ukraine characterized by punctuated episodes of “leapfrog” colonization. The establishment of this vector by the ETC presages larger-scale population movements by the Western Tripolye Culture (WTC), which led to the establishment of the giant-settlement phenomenon during the first part of the 4th millennium BC.
A full-stress, thermomechanically coupled, numerical model is used to explore the interaction between basal thermal conditions and motion of a terrestrially terminating section of the west Greenland ice sheet. The model domain is a two-dimensional flowline profile extending from the ice divide to the margin. We use data-assimilation techniques based on the adjoint model in order to optimize the basal traction field, minimizing the difference between modeled and observed surface velocities. We monitor the sensitivity of the frozen/melted boundary (FMB) to changes in prescribed geothermal heat flux and sliding speed by applying perturbations to each of these parameters. The FMB shows sensitivity to the prescribed geothermal heat flux below an upper threshold where a maximum portion of the bed is already melted. The position of the FMB is insensitive to perturbations applied to the basal traction field. This insensitivity is due to the short distances over which longitudinal stresses act in an ice sheet.
The Teacher
I met Everett Hughes in 1973, as a student in a graduate seminar at Brandeis University. The Sociology Department at that time had what might be described as a split personality: Marxism and critical sociology on one hand, and the Chicago School, reborn, on the other. Everett Hughes, who came to Brandeis from Chicago in 1961 to help establish the Brandeis graduate program, was a living embodiment of the Chicago School. He was 75 years old and in the last years of his teaching career.
I was in my second year of graduate school and knew of Hughes’ importance in the Chicago School. His comments in his seminars and faculty presentations crossed decades, geographies and intellectual traditions; European sociology in the time of Georg Simmel; South America in the context of African slavery, indigenous people and colonizers; professions in the context of the Middle Ages. He would connect circumstances and sociological ideas in a way that struck me as particularly insightful.
So I was not startled when Hughes addressed the seminar: ‘The most revolutionary figure in American history was Henry Ford […] because he realized that every worker assembling a Model T must make enough money assembling the car to buy one'. It is strange that I have such a vivid recollection of that moment. Several students clearly thought this so ridiculous as to be beyond funny. This was not the idea of revolution that was normally spoken about in the department! They were expecting Joe Hill perhaps, or at least Emma Goldman!
I still have his course syllabus from a course on multi-ethnic societies, taught in 1973. It is a one-page mimeograph, listing four books that ‘each student will be expected to have available’. They are Philip Mason’ 1970 Race Relations; Pierre van den Berghe's 1967 Race and Racism: A Comparative Perspective; Robert Park’ 1950 Race and Cultureand Franklin Frazier’ 1957 Race and Culture Contacts in the Modern World. We were to read the books and be orally examined, to write and present papers in which we would investigate one or more issues raised in the texts. I wrote about caste and race in India (where I had spent six months as an undergraduate student) through what Hughes had called ‘dilemmas and contradictions of status’ ([1945] 1971: 141).
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.