We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a dementia syndrome characterized early in its course by gradual dissolution of language and is associated with asymmetric atrophy in the language-dominant hemisphere (usually left). In contrast, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a dementia syndrome characterized by a progressive early decline in personality and comportment and is associated with relatively symmetric or rightward predominant bifrontal atrophy. This study analyzed the regional and hemispheric distributions of neuronal tau inclusions of the corticobasal degeneration variant of FTLD-tau pathology (FTLD-CBD) in individuals with PPA or bvFTD. The goal was to establish clinicopathologic concordance between FTLD-CBD and behavioral/comportmental vs aphasic dementia syndromes.
Participants and Methods:
Seven participants were clinically diagnosed with PPA and 6 were diagnosed with bvFTD. All had FTLD-CBD as the principal neuropathologic diagnosis at postmortem study. Sections from the following cortical regions were stained immunohistochemically with AT-8 to visualize neuronal tau inclusions: bilateral middle frontal gyrus (MFG), inferior parietal lobule (IPL), superior temporal gyrus (STG); and unilateral occipital cortex (OCC). Bilateral anterior temporal lobes (ATL) were analyzed in PPA cases only. Unbiased stereological analysis was performed to compare regional and hemispheric distributions between and within PPA vs. bvFTD groups.
Results:
Overall neocortical (MFG+STG+IPL) tau densities were significantly greater in the PPA group compared to the bvFTD group (p<0.05). Within the bvFTD group, the highest densities of tau inclusions were observed in the right MFG (mean=6,871.17; SD=3,220). In the PPA group, highest densities were observed in the left ATL (mean=9,901.81; SD=6,871). There was leftward hemispheric asymmetry of tau inclusions in IPL, STG and ATL which trended towards significance in the latter (p=0.083). Cortical distributions were symmetric or rightward predominant within the bvFTD group. Occipital cortex was devoid of inclusions.
Conclusions:
Preliminary stereological findings of FTLD-CBD tau inclusions suggest that the distributions of pathologic tau are different across two distinct clinical dementia phenotypes. The presence of left-sided neuronal tau inclusions in PPA is concordant with the aphasic phenotype whereas symmetric and frontal-predominant densities in bvFTD are consistent with comportmental dysfunction.
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a dementia syndrome characterized by initial development of progressive language deficits in the absence of impairment in other cognitive domains. It has historically been difficult to assess the presence or nature of true memory deficits in this population due to interference from language disturbance on task performance. The Three Words Three Shapes test (3W3S) is a relatively easy memory task that evaluates both verbal and nonverbal memory within the same modality and assesses different aspects of memory, including incidental encoding, effortful encoding, delayed recall, and recognition. Persons with PPA show a material-specific dissociation in performance on 3W3S; specifically, deficits in incidental encoding and recall are limited to verbal, not nonverbal material, in PPA, with preserved recognition of both types of information. However, it is unknown whether this pattern persists over time as the disease progresses.
Participants and Methods:
Participants were 73 participants enrolled in an observational PPA research study at the Mesulam Center for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease (Mage = 66.75 years, SD = 6.77; Meducation = 16.11 years, SD = 2.38; 51% female). Participants were subtyped as semantic (n = 15), logopenic (n = 27), or agrammatic PPA (n = 31) based on Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011, using 3W3S and other neuropsychological measures as described previously. Participants were followed at 2-year intervals and tests were administered longitudinally. All participants in the current study had 3W3S scores from at least two research visits collected between September 2012 and September 2022.
Results:
There were no significant baseline group differences on 3W3S performance, except for better incidental encoding in the logopenic than the semantic group for shapes (p = .040) and words (p = .043). We then conducted a mixed measures ANOVAs to determine baseline within-person comparisons between words vs shapes. Within individuals, performance on incidental encoding, effortful encoding, and recognition was worse for words than shapes (ps < .01). There was an interaction between material and group for delayed recall (p < .001) such that there was a significantly larger discrepancy between word and shape recall in the semantic (Mdiff = -9.14) compared to logopenic (Mdiff = -3.07) and agrammatic groups (Mdiff = -2.13). Repeated measures ANOVAs determined changes in scores over time collapsed across PPA subtypes. Incidental encoding (ps = <.01), effortful encoding (ps < .05), and delayed recall (ps < .01) declined for both words and shapes over time. Copy and recognition of words (ps < .05), but not shapes declined over time.
Conclusions:
The current results are consistent with prior findings of relative preservation of memory for nonverbal compared to verbal material in PPA as measured by 3W3S, especially in the semantic subtype. Learning and recall of words and shapes declined over time in all groups, whereas there was selective decline in copy and recognition of words compared to shapes. These results provide evidence of differential patterns of decline in certain aspects of memory over time in PPA and highlight the relative preservation of memory in this language-focused dementia even over time.
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a popular and simple-to-administer screening instrument to detect cognitive impairment. The MoCA generates a total score and six domain-specific index scores: (1) Memory, (2) Executive Functioning, (3) Attention, (4) Language, (5) Visuospatial, and (6) Orientation. It is unclear whether these MoCA scores can differentiate between distinct clinical dementia syndromes. This study compared MoCA Index scores between amnestic dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a language-based dementia.
Method:
Baseline MoCA data were analyzed from 33 DAT, 37 PPA, and 83 cognitively normal individuals enrolled in the Clinical Core of the Northwestern Alzheimer’s Disease Center. A one-way analysis of covariance adjusted for age was used to compare MoCA scores among groups. A logistic regression model was implemented to observe individual likelihood of group affiliation based on MoCA Index scores.
Results:
The mean MoCA total score was significantly higher in controls compared to both patient groups (p < .001) but did not differ between DAT and PPA groups. However, in accordance with salient clinical features commonly observed in DAT versus PPA, Memory and Orientation Index scores were lowest in the DAT group (p < .001), whereas Language and Attention Index scores were lowest in the PPA group (p < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the individual effects of Memory (p = .001), Language (p = .002), and Orientation (p = .025) Indices were significant.
Conclusions:
MoCA Index scores can help differentiate among distinct cognitive syndromes, suggesting it may be a useful brief screening tool to detect domain-specific cognitive impairment.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.