To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Recovery is a key goal for individuals, and services’ recovery orientation can facilitate this process. The independent mental health sector is increasingly important in Ireland, particularly in counselling and suicide prevention. We aimed to evaluate Pieta House as a recovery-oriented service through clients’ self-rated recovery; and clients’ and therapists’ evaluation of the service.
Clients completing therapy over a 3-month period were invited to complete the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and the Recovery Self Assessment-Revised (RSA-R). Therapists completed the RSA-R staff version.
Response rate was 36.7% for clients (n=88), 98% for therapists (n=49). Personal recovery was endorsed by 73.8% of clients, with highest agreement for factors ‘Willingness to Ask for Help’ (84.5%), and ‘Reliance on Others’ (82.1%). A smaller number agreed with factors ‘Personal Confidence and Hope’ (61.3%) and ‘No Domination by Symptoms’ (66.6%). Clients’ and therapists’ evaluation of the service showed high levels of agreement with factors of ‘Choice’ (90.9% clients, 100% therapists); ‘Life Goals’ (84.1% clients, 98% therapists) and ‘Individually Tailored Services’ (80.6% clients, 79.6% therapists). Client involvement in service management had the lowest level of agreement (36.4% clients, 30.6% therapists). Clients’ self-rated recovery correlated with their rating of the service (correlation value 0.993, p=0.01).
Clients’ self-rated recovery and the recovery orientation of Pieta House were rated highly, with areas for improvement in service user involvement, peer support and advocacy. The correlation of personal recovery and recovery orientation of the service may merit further study.
Differential forms constitutes an approach to multivariable calculus that simplifies the study of integration over surfaces of any dimension in Rp. This topic introduces algebraic techniques into the study of higher dimensional geometry and allows us to recapture with rigor the results obtained in the preceding chapter.
There are many approaches to defining and exploring differential forms, all leading to the same objective. One is to just define a form as a symbol with certain properties. That was the approach taken when I first encountered the subject. Though this appeals to many and ultimately leads to the same objective, it strikes me as inconsistent with the approach we have taken. So in this chapter I have decided to follow the approach in  where a form is defined in terms that are more in line with what I think is the background of readers of this book. The reader might also want to look at , , and  where there are different approaches.
Here we will define differential forms and explore their algebraic properties and the process of differentiating them. The first definition extends that of a surface as given in the preceding chapter.
Definition. Let q ≥ 1. A q-surface domain or just a surface domain is a compact Jordan subset R of Rq such that int R is connected and R = cl (int R). A q-surface in Rp is a pair where R is a q-surface domain and is a function from R into Rp that is smooth on some neighborhood of R. The trace of is the set. If G is an open subset of Rp and, we say is a q-surface in G; let Sq(G) be the collection of all q-surfaces contained in G.
This rigorous textbook is intended for a year-long analysis or advanced calculus course for advanced undergraduate or beginning graduate students. Starting with detailed, slow-paced proofs that allow students to acquire facility in reading and writing proofs, it clearly and concisely explains the basics of differentiation and integration of functions of one and several variables, and covers the theorems of Green, Gauss, and Stokes. Minimal prerequisites are assumed, and relevant linear algebra topics are reviewed right before they are needed, making the material accessible to students from diverse backgrounds. Abstract topics are preceded by concrete examples to facilitate understanding, for example, before introducing differential forms, the text examines low-dimensional examples. The meaning and importance of results are thoroughly discussed, and numerous exercises of varying difficulty give students ample opportunity to test and improve their knowledge of this difficult yet vital subject.
In this chapter we begin the study of p-dimensional Euclidean space, Rp, but in this beginning we will carry it a step further. We want to discuss differentiation and integration on Rp, but first we need to extend the notions of sequential convergence, the properties of sets, and the concept of continuity to the higher dimensional spaces. The effort to explore these concepts in Rp, however, is not greater than what is required to explore these notions in what are called metric spaces. In many respects the abstract spaces are easier to cope with than Rp. Moreover some of what we have already done is properly couched in metric spaces. Indeed, the material of §4.1 can be set there with little additional effort. Nevertheless during this venture into abstraction the main set of examples will be Euclidean space.
We start with the concept of distance between points. This must be general enough to encompass a variety of circumstances, but it should conform to the intuitive notion we all have of what is meant by distance. Since this is done at the start of the first section, it would be profitable before proceeding for the reader to reflect on what properties (s)he thinks should be included in an abstract concept of distance; then you can compare your thoughts with the definition that starts the following section.
The treatment of metric spaces here is based on Chapter 1 of .
Definitions and Examples
Definition. A metric space is a pair of objects, (X, d), where X is a set and d is a function d : X × X → [0,∞) called a metric, that satisfies the following for all x, y, z in X:
Condition (a) is sometimes called the symmetric property and says that the distance from x to y is the same as the distance from y to x. The second property says the obvious: the distance from a point to itself is 0 and the only point at a distance zero from x is x itself.
Field studies were initiated in the 2013-14 and 2014-15 growing seasons to evaluate the potential of soil solarization (SS) treatments for their efficacy on weed control and crop yields and to compare SS to 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D)+chloropicrin (Pic) fumigation. Each replicate was a bed with dimension 10.6 m long by 0.8 m wide on top. The center 4.6 m length of each bed, referred to as plots, was used for strawberry plug transplanting and data collection. Treatments included: i) 1,3-D+Pic (39% 1,3-dichloropropene+59.6% chloropicrin) that was shank-fumigated in beds at 157 kg ha−1 and covered with VIF on August 30 in both seasons; ii) SS for a 6 wk duration initiated on August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2014 by covering the bed with 1 mil clear polyethylene tarp; iii) SS for a 4wk duration initiated on September 6, 2013 and September 3, 2014; iv) SS 4 wk treatment initiated September 6, 2013 and September 3, 2014 and replaced with black VIF on October 4, 2013 and October 1, 2014 and v) a nontreated control covered with black VIF on October 4, 2013 and October 1, 2014. In both seasons, following completion of the preplant treatments, ‘Chandler’ strawberry was planted in two rows at a 36 cm in-row spacing in plots during the first wk of October. Over both seasons, the 6 wk SS treatment consistently lowered the weed density compared to the nontreated control. Weed density in the 6wk SS treatment was not statistically different from the 4wk SS treatments in the 2013-14 growing season. In both seasons, crop yield in the 4 wk SS was significantly lower than other treatments.