We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
from
Section III
-
Introduction: immunity, diagnosis, vector, and beneficial uses of neurotropic viruses
By
C. Jane Welsh, Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Andrew J. Steelman, Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Amy N. Sieve, Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Wentao Mi, Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Robin R. Johnson, Psychology Department, College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Colin R. Young, Department of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and Department of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Thomas W. Prentice, Psychology Department, College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA,
Mary W. Meagher, Psychology Department, College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Historical aspects of the neuroendocrine-immune connection
In order to understand the connection between the neuroendocrine and immune system, it is important to discuss the historical aspects of this relationship and the formulation of the concepts of homeostasis and stress. Claude Bernard in the 1860s developed the concept of “the milieu interne” to describe the balance of the internal milieu. In 1927, Cannon defined the fight or flight response to a threat and the concept of homeostasis as the physiological process by which an organism maintains a stable internal environment [1]. Then in 1936, Hans Selye observed that sick patients all had similar nonspecific symptoms: malaise, fever, and loss of appetite [2]. He proposed the general adaptation syndrome that states that when threatened by a threat or infection, the central nervous system (CNS) diverts the organism's energy reserves from nonessential functions (reproduction, growth) to functions that allow the organism to cope with the insult. Selye borrowed the term “stress” from the physical sciences to describe factors that upset homeostasis. He observed that stressed animals developed atrophy of the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes and enlarged adrenal glands. Eventually, these effects were discovered to be the result of activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). Recently, McEwen has proposed the concept of allostatic load, which describes the cumulative effects of chronic stess that can result in dysregulation of multiple integrated physiological systems [3].
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.