We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Turbulent boundary layers under adverse pressure gradients are studied using well-resolved large-eddy simulations (LES) with the goal of assessing the influence of the streamwise pressure-gradient development. Near-equilibrium boundary layers were characterized through the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
. In order to fulfil the near-equilibrium conditions, the free stream velocity was prescribed such that it followed a power-law distribution. The turbulence statistics pertaining to cases with a constant value of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
(extending up to approximately 40 boundary-layer thicknesses) were compared with cases with non-constant
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
distributions at matched values of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
and friction Reynolds number
$Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}}$
. An additional case at matched Reynolds number based on displacement thickness
$Re_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}^{\ast }}$
was also considered. It was noticed that non-constant
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
cases appear to approach the conditions of equivalent constant
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
cases after long streamwise distances (approximately 7 boundary-layer thicknesses). The relevance of the constant
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
cases lies in the fact that they define a ‘canonical’ state of the boundary layer, uniquely characterized by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
and
$Re$
. The investigations on the flat plate were extended to the flow around a wing section overlapping in terms of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
and
$Re$
. Comparisons with the flat-plate cases at matched values of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
and
$Re$
revealed that the different development history of the turbulent boundary layer on the wing section leads to a less pronounced wake in the mean velocity as well as a weaker second peak in the Reynolds stresses. This is due to the weaker accumulated effect of the
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
history. Furthermore, a scaling law suggested by Kitsios et al. (Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 61, 2016, pp. 129–136), proposing the edge velocity and the displacement thickness as scaling parameters, was tested on two constant-pressure-gradient parameter cases. The mean velocity and Reynolds-stress profiles were found to be dependent on the downstream development. The present work is the first step towards assessing history effects in adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers and highlights the fact that the values of the Clauser pressure-gradient parameter and the Reynolds number are not sufficient to characterize the state of the boundary layer.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.