Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:44:17.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Fetal Hemolytic Disease (Content last reviewed: 15th February 2018)

from Section 3 - Late Prenatal – Fetal Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2017

David James
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Philip Steer
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Carl Weiner
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Bernard Gonik
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit
Stephen Robson
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle
Get access

Summary

Rhesus alloimmunization has become a rare clinical entity, at least in industrialized nations. It is more than 80 years since neonatal hydrops, anemia, and jaundice were first recognized as a single disease characterized by perinatal hepatosplenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and nucleated red blood cells (RBCs) on the peripheral smear. What followed is a fetal success story. Levine and coworkers identified a decade later that the rhesus (Rh) antibodies on the RBCs of affected but not unaffected neonates were the cause of the anemia. The basic “story” was 60% completed 7 years later when Chown proved that transplacental fetal-to-maternal hemorrhage was a cause of maternal isoimmunization. In 1961, hemolytic anemia became the first treatable fetal disease after Liley characterized its natural history and then successfully transfused affected fetuses intraperitoneally with adult RBCs. Freda and colleagues completed the basic story when they demonstrated in 1964 that passive immunization of Rh-negative individuals with Rh-positive antibodies prior to purposeful exposure to Rh-positive RBCs prevented immunization.

Type
Chapter
Information
High-Risk Pregnancy
Management Options
, pp. 280 - 307
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
First published in: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Bennett, PR, Le Van Kim, C, Colin, Y, et al. Prenatal determination of fetal RhD type by DNA amplification. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 607–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chown, B, Duff, AM, James, J, et al. Prevention of primary Rh immunization: First report of the Western Canadian Trial. Can Med J 1969; 100: 1021–47.Google Scholar
Harper, DC, Swingle, HM, Weiner, CP, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and brain volume after treatment for hydrops fetalis by in utero intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 192200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liley, AW. Errors in the assessment of hemolytic disease from amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 86: 485–94.Google Scholar
Mari, G, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RL, et al.; Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunization. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 914.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Kemp, JR. Have Liley charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 90–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, CP, Pelzer, GD, Heilskov, J, et al. The effect of intravascular transfusion on umbilical venous pressure in anemic fetuses with and without hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 149E.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: I. Prediction of fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 546–53.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: ii. Outcome of treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1302–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yankowitz, J, Li, S, Weiner, CP. Polymerase chain reaction determination of RhC, Rhc, and RhE blood types: an evaluation of accuracy and clinical utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1107–11.Google Scholar

References

Diamond, LK, Blackfan, KD, Baty, JM. Erythroblastosis fetalis and its association with universal edema of the fetus, icterus gravis neonatorum and anemia of the newborn. J Pediatr 1932; 1: 269–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, P, Katzin, EM, Burnham, L. Isoimmunization in pregnancy: Its possible bearing on the etiology of erythroblastosis fetalis. JAMA 1941; 116: 825–30.Google Scholar
Chown, B. Anemia from bleeding of the fetus into the mother’s circulation. Lancet 1954; I: 1213–15.Google Scholar
Liley, AW. Liquor amnii analysis and management of pregnancy complicated by rhesus immunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82: 1359–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liley, AW. Errors in the assessment of hemolytic disease from amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963; 86: 485–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freda, VJ, Gorman, JG, Pollack, W. Successful prevention of experimental Rh sensitization in man with an anti-Rh gamma-2-globulin antibody preparation—A preliminary report. Transfusion 1964; 4: 2631.Google Scholar
Rodeck, CH, Holman, CA, Karnicki, J, et al. Direct intravascular fetal blood transfusion by fetoscopy in severe rhesus isoimmunization. Lancet 1981; I: 652–4.Google Scholar
Mari, G, Deter, RL, Carpenter, RL, et al.; Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red cell alloimmunization. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 914.Google Scholar
Holzgreve, W, Gänshirt-Ahlert, D, Burschyk, M, et al. Detection of fetal DNA in maternal blood by PCR. Lancet 1990; 335: 1220–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lo, YM, Patel, P, Wainscoat, JS, et al. Prenatal sex determination by DNA amplification from maternal peripheral blood. Lancet 1989; 2: 1363–5.Google Scholar
Mourant, AE, Kopec, AC, Domaniewska-Sobozak, K. The Distribution of Human Blood Groups and Other Polymophisms, 2nd edn. London: Oxford University Press, 1976, pp. 351505.Google Scholar
Joseph, KS, Kramer, MS. The decline in Rh hemolytic disease: should Rh prophylaxis get all the credit? Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 209–15.Google Scholar
Bowman, JM, Pollock, JM, Penston, LE. Fetomaternal transplacental hemorrhage during pregnancy and after delivery. Vox Sang 1986; 51: 117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westhoff, CM. The structure and function of the Rh antigen complex. Semin Hematol 2007; 44: 4250.Google Scholar
Ballas, S, Clark, MR, Mohandas, N, et al. Red cell membranes and cation deficiency in Rhnull syndrome. Blood 1984; 63: 1046–55.Google Scholar
Bruce, LJ, Ghosh, S, King, MJ, et al. Absence of CD47 in protein 4.2-deficient hereditary spherocytosis in man: An interaction between the Rh complex and the band 3 complex. Blood 2002; 100: 1878–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, KN, Parthasarathy, R, Westhoff, CM, et al. Protein 4.2 is critical to CD47-membrane skeleton attachment in human red cells. Blood 2004; 103: 1131–6.Google Scholar
Nicolas, V, Le Van Kim, C, Gane, P, et al. Rh-RhAG/ankyrin-R, a new interaction site between the membrane bilayer and the red cell skeleton, is impaired by Rh(null)-associated mutation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 25526–33.Google Scholar
Marini, AM, Matassi, G, Raynal, V, et al. The human Rhesus-associated RhAG protein and a kidney homologue promote ammonium transport in yeast. Nat Genet 2000; 26: 341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westhoff, CM, Ferreri-Jacobia, M, Mak, DOD, Foskett, JK. Identification of the erythrocyte Rh blood group glycoprotein as a mammalian ammonium transporter. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 12499–502.Google Scholar
Conroy, MJ, Bullough, PA, Merrick, M, Avent, ND. Modelling the human rhesus proteins: Implications for structure and function. Br J Haematol 2005; 131: 543–51.Google Scholar
Liu, Z, Chen, Y, Mo, R, et al. Characterization of human RhCG and mouse RhCG as novel nonerythroid Rh glycoprotein homologues predominantly expressed in kidney and testis. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 25641–51.Google Scholar
Weiner, ID, Verlander, JW. Renal and hepatic expression of the ammonium transporter proteins, Rh B glycoprotein and Rh C glycoprotein. Acta Physiol Scand 2003; 179: 331–8.Google Scholar
Weiner, ID, Miller, RT, Verlander, JW. Localization of the ammonium transporters, Rh B glycoprotein and Rh C glycoprotein, in the mouse liver. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 1432–40.Google Scholar
Tippett, P, Sanger, R. Observations on subdivisions of the Rh antigen D. Vox Sang 1962; 7: 914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowman, JM. Maternal alloimmunization and fetal hemolytic disease. In Reece, EA, Hobbins, JC, Mahoney, MJ, Petrie, RH (eds), Medicine of the Fetus and Mother. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 1992, pp. 1152–82.Google Scholar
Knibll, W. Der gang der erythrophose beim menschlichen embryo. Acta Haematol 1949; 2: 369–77.Google Scholar
Palfi, M, Hilden, JO, Gottvall, T, Selbing, A. Placental transport of maternal immunoglobulin G in pregnancies at risk of Rh (D) hemolytic disease of the newborn. Am J Reprod Immunol 1998; 39: 323–8.Google Scholar
Hilden, JO, Gottvall, T, Lindblom, B. HLA phenotypes and severe Rh (D) immunization. Tissue Antigens 1995; 46: 313–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: I. Prediction of fetal anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 546–53.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP. Human fetal bilirubin and fetal hemolytic disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 116: 1449–54.Google Scholar
Soothill, PW, Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, et al. Relationship of fetal hemoglobin and oxygen content to lactate concentration in sensitized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 268–71.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Warenski, JC, Rodeck, CH. The relationship of fetal protein concentration and haemoglobin level to the development of hydrops in rhesus isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 152: 341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phibbs, RH, Johnson, P, Tooley, WE. Cardio-respiratory status of erythroblastotic infants. II. Blood volume, hematocrit, and serum albumin concentration in relation to hydrops fetalis. Pediatrics 1974; 53: 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, CP, Heilskov, J, Pelzer, G, et al. Normal values for human umbilical venous and amniotic fluid pressures and their alteration by fetal disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 714–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, CP, Williamson, RA, Wenstrom, KD, et al. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: ii. Outcome of treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1302–7.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Pelzer, GD, Heilskov, J, et al. The effect of intravascular transfusion on umbilical venous pressure in anemic fetuses with and without hydrops. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 149E.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Sipes, SL, Wenstrom, KD. The effect of gestation upon normal fetal laboratory parameters and venous pressure. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 713–18.Google Scholar
Lucas, GF, Hadley, AG, Nance, SJ, Garratty, G. Predicting hemolytic disease of the newborn: a comparison of the monocyte monolayer assay and the chemiluminescence test. Transfusion 1993; 33: 484–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moise, KJ, Perkins, JT, Sosler, SD, et al. The predictive value of maternal serum testing for detection of fetal anemia in red blood cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 1003–9.Google Scholar
Buggins, AG, Thilaganathan, B, Hambley, H, Nicolaides, KH. Predicting the severity of rhesus alloimmunization: monocyte-mediated chemiluminescence versus maternal anti-D antibody estimation. Br J Haematol 1994; 88: 199200.Google Scholar
Gordon, LG, Hyland, CA, Hyett, JA, et al. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping of RhD negative pregnant women for targeted anti-D therapy in Australia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Prenat Diagn 2017; 37: 1245–53. doi: 10.1002/pd.5176.Google Scholar
Abbey, R, Dunsmoor-Su, R. Cost–benefit analysis of indirect antiglobulin screening in Rh(D)-negative women at 28 weeks gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 938–45.Google Scholar
Bowman, JM, Chown, B, Lewis, M, Pollock, JM. Rh isoimmunization during pregnancy: antenatal prophylaxis. Can Med Assoc J 1978; 118: 623–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Chilcott, J, Tappenden, P, Lloyd Jones, M, et al. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative. BJOG 2004; 111: 903–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowman, JM, Pollack, JM. Transplacental fetal hemorrhage after amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66: 749–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Chown, B, Duff, AM, James, J, et al. Prevention of primary Rh immunization: first report of the Western Canadian Trial. Can Med J 1969; 100: 1021–47.Google Scholar
Pollack, W, Ascari, WQ, Kochesky, RJ, et al. Studies on Rh prophylaxis. I. Relationship between doses of anti-Rh and the size of the antigenic stimulus. Transfusion 1971; 11: 333–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, JM, Pollock, JM. Amniotic fluid spectrophotometry and early delivery in the management of erythroblastosis fetalis. Pediatrics 1965; 35: 815–21.Google Scholar
LeVanKim, C, Mouro, I, Brossard, Y, et al. PCR-based determination of Rhc and RhE status of fetuses at risk of Rhc and RhE haemolytic disease. Br J Haematol 1994; 88: 193–5.Google Scholar
Bennett, PR, Le Van Kim, C, Colin, Y, et al. Prenatal determination of fetal RhD type by DNA amplification. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 607–10.Google Scholar
Van den Veyver, IB, Subramanian, SB, Hudson, KM, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of the RhD fetal blood type on amniotic fluid by polymerase chain reaction. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 419–22.Google Scholar
Fisk, NM, Bennett, P, Warwick, RM, et al. Clinical utility of fetal RhD typing in alloimmunized pregnancies by means of polymerase chain reaction on amniocytes or chorionic villi. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 50–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yankowitz, J, Li, S, Weiner, CP. Polymerase chain reaction determination of RhC, Rhc, and RhE blood types: an evaluation of accuracy and clinical utility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 1107–11.Google Scholar
Geifman-Holtzman, O, Grotegut, CA, Gaughan, JP. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fetal Rh genotyping from maternal blood: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1163–73.Google Scholar
Geifman-Holtzman, O, Grotegut, CA, Gaughan, JP, et al. Noninvasive fetal RhCE genotyping from maternal blood. BJOG 2009; 116: 144–51.Google Scholar
Szczepura, A, Osipenko, L, Freeman, K. A new fetal RHD genotyping test: costs and benefits of mass testing to target antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in England and Wales. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2011; 11: 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, LM, Pavlakis, SG, DeVivo, D, et al. Transcranial Doppler measurements of the middle cerebral artery. Effect of hematocrit Stroke 1988; 19: 1466–9.Google Scholar
Vyas, S, Nicolaides, KH, Campbell, S. Doppler examination of the middle cerebral artery in anemic fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1066–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mari, G, Adrignolo, A, Abuhamad, AZ, et al. Diagnosis of fetal anemia with Doppler ultrasound in pregnancy complicated by maternal blood group immunization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 400–5.Google Scholar
Steiner, H, Schaffer, H, Spitzer, D, et al. The relationship between peak velocity in the fetal descending aorta and hematocrit in rhesus isoimmunization. Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 659–62.Google Scholar
Vintzileos, AM, Campbell, WA, Storlazzi, E, et al. Fetal liver ultrasound measurements in isoimmunized pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 68: 162.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH, Fontanarosa, M, Gabbe, SG, Rodeck, CH. Failure of six ultrasonographic parameters to predict the severity of fetal anemia in Rhesus isoimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 920–6.Google Scholar
Frigoletto, FD, Greene, MF, Benacerraf, BR, et al. Ultramonographic fetal surveillance in the management of the isoimmunized pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 430–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottval, T, Hilden, JO. Concentration of anti-D antibodies in Rh(D) alloimmunized pregnant women, as a predictor of anemia and/or hyperbilirubinemia in their newborn infants. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 733–8.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Widness, JA. Decreased fetal erythropoiesis and hemolysis in Kell hemolytic anemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 547–51.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, RL, Beyth, Y, Sadovsky, E. Death in utero due to Kell sensitization without excessive elevation of the delta OD450 value in amniotic fluid. Obstet Gynecol 1982; 60: 746–9.Google Scholar
Vaughan, JI, Warwick, R, Letsky, E, et al. Erythropoietic suppression in fetal anemia because of Kell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 247–52.Google Scholar
Vaughan, JI, Manning, M, Warick, RM, et al. Inhibition of erythroid progenitor cells by anti-Kell antibodies in fetal alloimmune anemia. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 798803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaides, KH, Rodeck, CH, Mibashan, RS, Kemp, JR. Have Liley charts outlived their usefulness? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 90–4.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Wenstrom, KD, Sipes, SL, Williamson, RA. Risk factors for cordocentesis and fetal intravascular transfusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 1020–3.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Okamura, K. Diagnostic fetal blood sampling: technique related losses. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 169–75.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Grant, SS, Hudson, J, et al. Effect of diagnostic and therapeutic cordocentesis upon maternal serum alpha fetoprotein concentration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 706–8.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP. Management of fetal hemolytic disease by cordocentesis: outcome of affected neonates not requiring transfusion. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996; 11: 176–8.Google Scholar
Graham-Pole, J, Barr, W, Willoughby, ML. Continuous-flow plasmapheresis management of severe rhesus disease. BMJ 1977; 1: 1185–8.Google Scholar
Berlin, G, Selbing, A, Ryden, G. Rhesus haemolytic disease treated with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Lancet 1985; I: 1153.Google Scholar
Zwiers, C, van der Bom, JG, van Kamp, IL, et al. Postponing Early intrauterine Transfusion with Intravenous immunoglobulin Treatment: the PETIT study on severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 291.e1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.007.Google Scholar
Zhao, L, Huang, X, Wang, Q. Antenatal treatment of maternal fetal Rh incompatibility hemolysis disease. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 1998; 33: 406–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Huizing, K, Roislien, J, Hansen, T. Intravenous immune globulin reduces the need for exchange transfusions in Rhesus and ABO incompatibility. Acta Paediatrica 2008; 97: 1362–5.Google Scholar
Fox, C, Martin, W, Somerset, DA, et al. Early intraperitoneal transfusion and adjuvant maternal immunoglobulin therapy in the treatment of severe red cell alloimmunization prior to fetal intravascular transfusion. Fetal Diagn Ther 2008; 23: 159–63.Google Scholar
Ruma, MS, Moise, KJ, Kim, E, et al. Combined plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin for the treatment of severe maternal red cell alloimmunization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 138.e1–6.Google Scholar
Voto, LS, Mathet, ER, Zapaterio, JL, et al. High-dose gammaglobulin (IVIG) followed by intrauterine transfusions (IUTs): a new alternative for the treatment of severe fetal hemolytic disease. J Perinat Med 1997; 25: 85–8.Google Scholar
Deka, D, Buckshee, K, Kinra, G. Intravenous immunoglobulin as primary therapy or adjuvant therapy to intrauterine fetal blood transfusion: a new approach in the management of severe Rh-immunization. J Obstet Gynecol Res 1996; 22: 561–7.Google Scholar
Watts, DH, Luthy, DA, Benedetti, TJ, et al. Intraperitoneal fetal transfusion under direct ultrasound guidance. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 84–8.Google Scholar
Frigoletto, FD, Umansky, I, Birnholz, J, et al. Intrauterine fetal transfusion in 365 fetuses during fifteen years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139: 781–6.Google Scholar
Harman, CR, Bowman, JM, Manning, FA, Menticoglou, SM. Intrauterine transfusion: intraperitoneal versus intravascular approach. A case–control comparison. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1053–9.Google Scholar
Chestnut, DH, Pollack, KL, Weiner, CP, et al. Does furosemide alter the hemodynamic response to rapid intravascular transfusion of the anemic fetal lamb? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1571–5.Google Scholar
Egberts, J, van Kamp, IL, Kanhai, HH, et al. The disappearance of fetal and donor red blood cells in alloimmunized pregnancies: A reappraisal. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 818–24.Google Scholar
Robillard, JE, Weiner, CP. Atrial natriuretic factor in the human fetus effect of volume expansion. Pediatrics 1988; 113: 552–5.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Robillard, JE. Arginine vasopressin and acute, intravascular volume expansion in the human fetus. Fetal Ther 1989; 4: 6972.Google Scholar
Weiner, CP, Robillard, JE. Effect of acute intravascular volume expansion upon human fetal prostaglandin concentrations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 1494–7.Google Scholar
Ovali, F, Samanci, N, Dagoglu, T. Management of late anemia in Rhesus hemolytic disease: use of recombinant human erythropoietin (a pilot study). Pediatr Res 1996; 39: 831–4.Google Scholar
Ellis, MI. Follow-up study of survivors after intrauterine transfusion. Dev Med Child Neurol 1980; 22: 4854.Google Scholar
White, CA, Goplerud, CP, Kisker, CT, et al. Intrauterine fetal transfusion, 1965–1976, with an assessment of the surviving children. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 933–42.Google Scholar
Harper, DC, Swingle, HM, Weiner, CP, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and brain volume after treatment for hydrops fetalis by in utero intravascular transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 192200.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×