Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- General Introduction
- Part I Foundational Issues: History and Approaches to Personality
- Part II Description and Measurement: How Personality Is Studied
- Part III Development, Health and Change: Life Span and Health Outcomes
- Part IV Biological Perspectives: Evolution, Genetics and Neuroscience of Personality
- 16 Evolutionary Personality Psychology
- 17 Personality in Nonhuman Animals
- 18 Genetics of Personality
- 19 Approach–Avoidance Theories of Personality
- 20 Personality Neuroscience
- Part V Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality
- Part VI Social and Cultural Processes: Personality at the Intersection of Society
- Part VII Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action
- Addendum: Statistical Analyses and Computer Programming in Personality
- Index
- References
16 - Evolutionary Personality Psychology
from Part IV - Biological Perspectives: Evolution, Genetics and Neuroscience of Personality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- General Introduction
- Part I Foundational Issues: History and Approaches to Personality
- Part II Description and Measurement: How Personality Is Studied
- Part III Development, Health and Change: Life Span and Health Outcomes
- Part IV Biological Perspectives: Evolution, Genetics and Neuroscience of Personality
- 16 Evolutionary Personality Psychology
- 17 Personality in Nonhuman Animals
- 18 Genetics of Personality
- 19 Approach–Avoidance Theories of Personality
- 20 Personality Neuroscience
- Part V Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives: Dynamic Processes of Personality
- Part VI Social and Cultural Processes: Personality at the Intersection of Society
- Part VII Applications of Personality Psychology: Personality Traits and Processes in Action
- Addendum: Statistical Analyses and Computer Programming in Personality
- Index
- References
Summary
Historically, psychology has been characterized by a dichotomy between branches that focus on human nature and those that focus on individual differences. Initial “grand theories” of personality, such as those advanced by Freud, Maslow and others, were interested in universal psychological features. For Freud, the emphasis was on sexual and aggressive “instincts” and a universal sequence of psychosexual stages. For Maslow, the focus was on a hierarchy of universal psychological needs, from immediate physiological demands to “self-actualization.” Historically, personality psychology has been the primary branch that has aspired to such broad conceptualizations of human nature.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Personality Psychology , pp. 223 - 234Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M. G., Wehbe, Y., & Buss, D. M. (2019). Context, environment, and learning in evolutionary psychology. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Al-Shawaf, L., Zreik, K. A., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Thirteen misunderstandings about natural selection. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Al-Shawaf, L., & Zreik, K. A. (2018). Richard Dawkins on constraints on natural selection. In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–5). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Alvergne, A., Jokela, M., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Personality and reproductive success in a high-fertility human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 11745–11750.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. D. (1995). Continua outperform dichotomies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 543–544.Google Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (1984). Evolutionary biology and personality psychology: Toward a conception of human nature and individual differences. American Psychologist, 39, 1135–1147.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: Why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2009). How can evolutionary psychology explain personality and individual differences? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 4, 359–366.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality, 67, 209–243.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). The evolution of jealousy. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 506–507.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Larsen, R. J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2014). Evolutionary personality psychology. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Series Eds.) & Cooper, L. & Larsen, R. (Vol. Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4. Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Buss, D., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., Angleitner, A., Oubaid, V., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359–363.Google Scholar
Buunk, A. P., & Hupka, R. B. (1987). Cross-cultural differences in the elicitation of sexual jealousy. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 12–22.Google Scholar
Camperio Ciani, A., Veronese, V., Capiluppi, , & Sartori, C. G. (2007). The adaptive values of personality differences revealed by small island population dynamics. European Journal of Personality, 21, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerda‐Flores, R. M., Barton, S. A., Marty‐Gonzalez, L. F., Rivas, F., & Chakraborty, R. (1999). Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: A validation study with blood group markers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 281–293.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Burton, M., Greenberger, E., & Dmitrieva, J. (1999). Population migration and the variation of dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) allele frequencies around the globe. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 309–324.Google Scholar
Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11–27.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Penke, L., & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 201–211.Google Scholar
Deary, I. J., Weiss, A., & Batty, G. D. (2010). Intelligence and personality as predictors of illness and death: How researchers in differential psychology and chronic disease epidemiology are collaborating to understand and address health inequalities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 53–79.Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.Google Scholar
Denissen, J. J. A., & Penke, L. (2008). Individual reaction norms underlying the Five-Factor Model of personality: First steps towards a theory-based conceptual framework. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1285–1302.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. (2010). Evolution of personality: Developmental constraints on behavioral flexibility. The Auk, 127, 752–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2017). Sex differences in jealousy: A 25-year retrospective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 259–302.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, D. T., Campbell, B., Gray, P. B., & Sorenson, M. D. (2008). Dopamine receptor genetic polymorphisms and body composition in undernourished pastoralists: An exploration of nutrition indices among nomadic and recently settled Ariaal men of northern Kenya. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, 173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J., Schlomer, G. L., Tilley, E. H., & Butler, E. A. (2012). Impact of fathers on risky sexual behavior in daughters: A genetically and environmentally controlled sibling study. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 317–332.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Psychopathology: Type or trait? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 355–356.Google Scholar
Fay, J. C., Wyckoff, G. J., & Wu, C. (2001). Positive and negative selection of the human genome. Genetics, 158, 1227–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forstmeier, W., Martin, K., Bolund, E., Schielzeith, H., & Kempenaers, B. (2011). Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10608–10613.Google Scholar
Fu, W., O’Connor, T. D., Jun, G., Kang, H. M., Acecasis, G., Leal, S. M., … Akey, J. M. (2012). Analysis of 6,515 exomes reveals the recent origin of most human protein-coding variants. Nature, 493, 216–220.Google Scholar
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1991). Explorations in behavioral consistency: Properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 773–794.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 2023–2027.Google Scholar
Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.Google Scholar
Jokela, M., Hintsa, T., Hintsanen, M., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2010). Adult temperament and childbearing over the life course. European Journal of Personality, 24, 151–166.Google Scholar
Keightley, P. D. (2012). Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans. Genetics, 190, 295–304.Google Scholar
Keller, M. C., & Miller, G. F. (2006). Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: Which evolutionary genetic models work best? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 385–452.Google Scholar
Krupp, D. B., Sewall, L. A., Lalumière, M. L., Sheriff, C., & Harris, G. T. (2012). Nepotistic patterns of violent psychopathy: Evidence for adaptation? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge about human nature (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. G. (2011). The sibling uncertainty hypothesis: Facial resemblance as a sibling recognition cue. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 969–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. G. (2013). Individual differences and universal condition-dependent mechanisms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. G. (2015). Evolved individual differences: Advancing a condition-dependent model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., & Buss, D. M. (2017). Evolutionary psychology: A how-to guide. American Psychologist, 72, 353–373.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. G., Al-Shawaf, L., Janiak, M., & Akunebu, S. (2018). Integrating molecular genetics and evolutionary psychology: Sexual jealousy and the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 276–282.Google Scholar
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.Google Scholar
Li, N., & Kenrick, D. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 468–489.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2003). Does morality have a biological basis? An empirical test of the factors governing moral sentiments relating to incest. Proceedings of the Royal Society London (Biological Sciences), 270, 819–826.Google Scholar
Lieberman, D., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2007). The architecture of human kin detection. Nature, 445, 727–731.Google Scholar
Lukaszewski, A. W. (2013). Testing an adaptationist theory of trait covariation: Relative bargaining power as a common calibrator of an interpersonal syndrome. European Journal of Personality, 27, 328–345.Google Scholar
Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2011). The origins of extraversion: Joint effects of facultative calibration and genetic polymorphism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 409–421.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599.Google Scholar
Mendle, J., Harden, K. P., Turkheimer, E., van Hulle, C., D’Onofrio, B. M., Brooks-Gunn, J., … Lahey, B. B. (2009). Associations between father absence and age of first sexual intercourse. Child Development, 80, 1463–1480.Google Scholar
Munafo, M. R., & Flint, J. (2011). Dissecting the genetic architecture of human personality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 395–400.Google Scholar
Munafo, M. R., Yalcin, B., Willis-Owen, S. A., & Flint, J. (2008). Association of the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene and approach-related personality traits: Meta-analysis and new data. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D. (2005). An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J. (1985). Correlation and the coefficient of determination. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307–315.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology , 57, 401–421.Google Scholar
Penke, L. (2011). Bridging the gap between modern evolutionary psychology and the study of individual differences. In Buss, D. M. & Hawley, P. H. (Eds.), The evolution of personality and individual differences (pp. 243–279). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: Further evidence. Evolution & Human Behavior, 21, 39–48.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socio-economic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.Google Scholar
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. C. (1995). Evolution, mating effort, and crime. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 573–574.Google Scholar
Rowe, D. C., Clapp, M., & Wallis, J. (1987). Physical attractiveness and the personality resemblance of identical twins. Behavior Genetics, 17, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The Big Five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: Differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18, 301–319.Google Scholar
Schützwohl, A. (2006). Sex differences in jealousy: Information search and cognitive preoccupation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 285–292.Google Scholar
Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073–15078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, S., Burmeister, M., & Ghosh, D. (2004). Meta-analysis of the association between a serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and anxiety-related personality disorders. American Journal of Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 127B, 85–89.Google Scholar
Sih, A., Bell, A. M., Johnson, J. C ., & Ziemba, R. E. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: An integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241–277.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (1997). Cues to infidelity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1034–1045.Google Scholar
Silventoinen, K., Magnusson, P. K. E., Tynelius, P., Kaprio, J., & Rasmussen, F. (2008). Heritability of body size and muscle strength in young adulthood: A study of one million Swedish men. Genetic Epidemiology, 32, 341–349.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1987). If we’re all Darwinians, what’s the fuss about? In Crawford, C., Krebs, D. & Smith, M. (Eds.), Sociobiology and psychology (pp. 121–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5, 297–302.Google Scholar
Tochigi, M., Hibuno, H., Otowa, T., Kato, C., Marui, T., Ohtani, T., … Sasaki, T. (2006). Association between dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) exon III polymorphism and neuroticism in the Japanese population. Neuroscience Letters, 398, 333–336.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: The role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, 58, 17–67.Google Scholar
Tufto, J. (2000). The evolution of plasticity and nonplastic spatial and temporal adaptations in the presence of imperfect environmental cues. American Naturalist, 156, 121–123.Google Scholar
Verweij, K. J. H., Yang, J., Lahti, J., Veijola, J., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., … Zietsch, B. P. (2012). Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: Testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding. Evolution, 66, 3238–3251.Google Scholar
Verweij, K. J. H., Zietsch, B. P., Medland, S. E., Gordon, S. D., Benyamin, B., Nyholt, D. R., … Wray, N. R. (2010). A genome-wide association study of Cloninger’s Temperament scales: Implications for the evolutionary genetics of personality. Biological Psychology, 85, 306–317.Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, A. E., Pedersen, N. L., Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Magnussen, P. K. E., Iacono, W. G., … Wray, N. R. (2012). Common SNPs explain a significant proportion of the “missing heritability” in the personality dimensions of neuroticism and extraversion. Translational Psychiatry, 2, e102.Google Scholar
Westberg, L., Henningsson, S., Landén, M., Annerbrink, K., Melke, J., Nilsson, S., … Eriksson, E. (2009). Influence of androgen receptor repeat polymorphisms on personality traits in men. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 34, 205–211.Google Scholar
Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, R. R. (1993). Gender differences in sexual jealousy: Adaptationist or social learning explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 115–140.Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.Google Scholar
Willerman, L., Loehlin, J. C., & Horn, J. M. (1992). An adoption and a cross-fostering study of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) Psychopathic Deviate scale. Behavior Genetics, 22, 515–529.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. (1995). Sociopathy within and between small groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 577.Google Scholar
Yang, J. A., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., … Visscher, P. M. (2010). Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nature Genetics, 42, 565–569.Google Scholar
Zietsch, B. P., Verweij, K. J. H., Heath, A. C., & Martin, N. G. (2011). Variation in human mate choice: Simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting, and assortative mating. American Naturalist, 177, 605–616.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by