Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:34:20.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-sacrifice for in-group's history: A diachronic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Maria Babińska  and
Michal Bilewicz
Maria Babińska
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. maria.babinska@psych.uw.edu.plbilewicz@psych.uw.edu.plhttp://cbu.psychologia.pl
Michal Bilewicz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. maria.babinska@psych.uw.edu.plbilewicz@psych.uw.edu.plhttp://cbu.psychologia.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The problem of extended fusion and identification can be approached from a diachronic perspective. Based on our own research, as well as findings from the fields of social, political, and clinical psychology, we argue that the way contemporary emotional events shape local fusion is similar to the way in which historical experiences shape extended fusion. We propose a reciprocal process in which historical events shape contemporary identities, whereas contemporary identities shape interpretations of past traumas.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bilewicz, M. (2016) The dark side of emotion regulation: Historical defensiveness as an obstacle in reconciliation. Psychological Inquiry 27(2):89–95.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. & Babinska, M. (2018) Bystander, czyli kto? Potoczne wyobrażenia Polaków na temat stosunku do Żydów w czasie okupacji hitlerowskiej. [Bystander means whom? Lay representations about Polish–Jewish relations during the Nazi occupation of Poland]. Teksty Drugie 3.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M. & Wójcik, A. (2013) Harmful ideas, the structure and consequences of anti-Semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology 34(6):821–39.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M., Witkowska, M., Stefaniak, A. & Imhoff, R. (2017) The lay historian explains intergroup behavior: Examining the role of identification and cognitive structuring in ethnocentric historical attributions. Memory Studies 10(3):310–22.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. & Wójcik, A. (2010) Does identification predict community involvement? Exploring consequences of social identification among the Jewish minority in Poland. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 20(1):72–79.Google Scholar
Brown, R. & Kulik, J. (1977) Flashbulb memories. Cognition 5(1):73–99.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. E. (2004) A three-factor model of social identity. Self and identity 3(3):239–62.Google Scholar
Cichocka, A. (2016) Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology 27(1):283–317.Google Scholar
Curci, A. & Luminet, O. (2006) Follow-up of a cross-national comparison on flashbulb and event memory for the September 11th attacks. Memory 14(3):329–44.Google Scholar
De Guissmé, L. & Licata, L. (2017) Competition over collective victimhood recognition: When perceived lack of recognition for past victimization is associated with negative attitudes towards another victimized group. European Journal of Social Psychology 47(2):148–66.Google Scholar
Golec de Zavala, A. & Cichocka, A. (2012) Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15(2):213–29.Google Scholar
Klar, Y. & Bilewicz, M. (2017) From socially motivated lay historians to lay censors: Epistemic conformity and defensive group identification. Memory Studies 10(3):334–46.Google Scholar
Klar, Y. & Schori-Eyal, N. (2013) The “Never Again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues 69(1):125–43.Google Scholar
Klein, O., Licata, L. & Pierucci, S. (2011) Does group identification facilitate or prevent collective guilt about past misdeeds? Resolving the paradox. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(3):563–72.Google Scholar
Miron, A. M., Branscombe, N. R. & Biernat, M. (2010) Motivated shifting of justice standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(6):768–79.Google Scholar
Noor, M., Brown, R., Gonzalez, R., Manzi, J. & Lewis, C. A. (2008) On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(6):819–32.Google Scholar
Obst, P. L. & White, K. M. (2005) An exploration of the interplay between psychological sense of community, social identification and salience. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 15(2):127–35.Google Scholar
Sani, F., Bowe, M. & Herrera, M. (2008) Perceived collective continuity and social well-being: Exploring the connections. European Journal of Social Psychology 38(2):365–74.Google Scholar
Schori-Eyal, N., Klar, Y., Roccas, S. & McNeill, A. (2017) The shadows of the past: Effects of historical group trauma on current intergroup conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43(4):538–54. doi: 10.1177/0146167216689063.Google Scholar
Smeekes, A. & Verkuyten, M. (2013) Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defense. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49(6):984–94.Google Scholar
Smeekes, A. & Verkuyten, M. (2014) When national culture is disrupted: Cultural continuity and resistance to Muslim immigrants. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 17(1):45–66.Google Scholar
Staub, E. & Vollhardt, J. (2008) Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 78(3):267.Google Scholar
Vignoles, V. L. (2011) Identity motives. In: Handbook of identity theory and research, ed. Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K. & Vignoles, V. L., pp. 403–32. Springer.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. (2012) Collective victimization. In: Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict, ed. Tropp, L. R. & Tropp, L., pp. 136–57. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R. & Bilewicz, M. (2013) After the genocide: Psychological perspectives on victim, bystander, and perpetrator groups. Journal of Social Issues 69(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Vollhardt, J. R., Bilewicz, M. & Olechowski, M. (2015) Victims under siege: Lessons for Polish–Jewish relations and beyond. In: The social psychology of intractable conflicts, ed. Halperin, E. & Sharvit, K., pp. 75–87. Springer.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. & Aydin, C. (2008) Cultural issues in flashbulb memory. In: Flashbulb memories: New issues and new perspectives, ed. Luminet, O. & Curci, A., pp. 247–68. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Lehrner, A., Desarnaud, F., Bader, H. N., Makotkine, I., Flory, J. D., Bierer, L. M. & Meaney, M. J. (2014) Influences of maternal and paternal PTSD on epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in Holocaust survivor offspring. American Journal of Psychiatry 171(8):872–80.Google Scholar