American National Standards Institute (ANSI), www.ansi.orgGoogle Scholar

Civic Solar, Arc Fault Detection, Boston, MA, 2003Google Scholar

Earth Policy Institute, Climate, Energy and Transportation Data Center, www.earth-policy.org/data_center/C23Google Scholar

Electrical Safety Authority, Government and Regulations, The Ontario Electrical SafetyCode. Portland, ORGoogle Scholar

Florida Solar Energy Center (2010) Testing Method of Photovoltaic Module Power Rating. FSEC: 1–5Google Scholar

Go Solar California, www.gosolarcalifornia.orgGoogle Scholar

IEC/IECEE, List of Photovoltaic Members, www.iecee.org/pv/html/pvcntris.htmGoogle Scholar

PV Certification: The Sure Way to Safety, Quality and Performance, System of Conformity Assessment Schemes for Electrotechnical Equipment and Components, 2010Google Scholar

International Centre for Sustainable Trade and Development (ICSTD) (2001) Submission of the UNFCCC, Information and News Relating to Modalities for the Operationalisation of a Work Programme and Possible Forum on Response MeasuresGoogle Scholar

International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), www.iec.ch/about/ www.iec.ch/standardsdev/Google Scholar

International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), www.ilac.orgGoogle Scholar

International Renewable Energy Agency (2013) International Standardisation in the Field of Renewable Energy. IRENA, Masdar CityGoogle Scholar

Japan Electrical Safety and Environment Technical Laboratories, Certification of Photovoltaic Modules, www.jet.or.jp/en/products/solar/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Korean Institute of Energy Research, New and Renewable Energy Technology, Global Kier, 2011Google Scholar

SAI Global, www.saiglobal.comGoogle Scholar

Solar America Board for Codes and Standards, About Solar ABCs, 2011Google Scholar

Codes and Standards, 2011, www.solarabcs.org/about/index.htmGoogle Scholar

Solar Rating and Certification Corporation, www.solar-rating.org/about/general.htmlGoogle Scholar

Standards Council of Canada, Directory of Accredited Standards Development Organizations, www.scc.ca/en/accreditation/standards/directory-of-accredited-standards-development-organizationsGoogle Scholar

State of California Building Standards Commission, Codes, 2013, www.bsc.ca.gov/codes.aspxGoogle Scholar

United States Department of Commerce (2008) Clean Energy: An Exporter’s Guide to China, http://trade.gov/publications/pdfs/china-clean-energy2008.pdfGoogle Scholar

United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Recognised Testing Laboratories. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Typical Registered Certification Marks, www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/nrtlmrk.htmlGoogle Scholar

Wiles, John (2010). Ungrounded Electrical Systems, www.nmsu.edu/~tdi/pdf-resources/IAEI%20September-October%202010.pdfGoogle Scholar

World Standards, Electricity Around the World, www.worldstandards.eu/electricity.htmGoogle Scholar

Worldwatch Institute, The Way Forward for Renewable Energy in Central America. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Arcuri, Alessandra (2012) ‘Back to the future: US – Tuna II and the New Environment–Trade Debate’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3: 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beynon, Paul (2003) ‘Community mutual recognition agreements, technical barriers to trade and the WTO’s most favoured nation principle’, European Law Review, 28 (2): 231–249Google Scholar

Clarke, John (1996) ‘Mutual recognition agreements’, International Trade Law and Regulation, 2 (2): 31–34Google Scholar

Conrad, Christiane (2014) Processes and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis (2008) ‘Determining the necessity of domestic regulations in services: the best is yet to come’, European Journal of International Law, 19 (2): 365–408Google Scholar

Delimatsis, Panagiotis (2010) ‘Concluding the WTO services negotiations on domestic regulation: hopes and fears’, World Trade Review, 9 (4): 643–673Google Scholar

Diller, Janelle (2012) ‘Private standardisation in public international lawmaking’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 33 (3): 481Google Scholar

Elzinga, David et al. (2011) Advantage Energy. IEA, Paris: 1–64Google Scholar

Fontanelli, Filippo (2011) ‘ISO and Codex standards and international trade law: what gets said is now what’s heard’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60 (4): 895–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary and Kim, Jisun (2012) Issues and Considerations for Negotiating a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement. ICTSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar

International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (2011) Fostering Carbon Growth: The Case for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement. ICTSD Platform on Climate Change. Geneva, NovemberGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Matthew (2012) Legal Options for a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement. ICTSD, Geneva: 31–33Google Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle (2013) ‘The new TBT jurisprudence in US – Clove Cigarettes, WTO US – Tuna II, and US – COOL’, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 8 (1): 1Google Scholar

Martin, Jeremy and Carlos, Juan (2012) ‘Central America’s electric sector: the path to interconnection and a regional market’, Journal of Energy Security, August 13: 1–4Google Scholar

Mitchell, Andrew (2009) Legal Principles in WTO Disputes. Cambridge University Press: 201Google Scholar

Trujillo, Elizabeth (2012) ‘The WTO Appellate Body knocks down US “dolphin-safe” tuna labels but leaves a crack for PPMs’, ASIL Insights, 16 (25), JulyGoogle Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter (2008) The Law and the Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd edn. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Voon, Tania (2012) ‘Cigarettes and public health at the WTO: the appeals of the TBT labeling disputes begin’, ASIL Insights, 16 (6), FebruaryGoogle Scholar

Vranes, Erich (2009) Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Zhou, Weihuan (2012) ‘US-Clove Cigarettes and US – Tuna II (Mexico): implications for the role of regulatory purposes under Article III:4 of the GATT’, Journal of International Economic Law, 15 (4): 1075Google Scholar

Zleptnig, Stefan (2010) Non-Economic Objectives in WTO Law, Justification Provisions of GATT, GATS, SPS and TBT Agreements. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston, MAGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Decision of the Committee on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations with Relation to Articles 2 and 5 and Annex 3 of the Agreement. Second Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, Annex 4, G/TBT/9, 3 November 2000. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Decisions and Recommendations adopted by the Committee since January 1995, Note by the Secretariat, Revision, G/TBT/1/Rev. 8, 23 May 2002. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting of 23–24 June 2010, G/TBT/M/51. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Concerns Raised about Tobacco and Environmental Measures, Technical Barriers to Trade: Formal Meeting, 15 and 16 June 2011. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting of 10–11 November 2011, Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/55, 9 February 2012. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Minutes of the Meeting of 20–21 March 2012, Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/56, 16 May 2012. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade, Eighteenth Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement, Note by the Secretariat, 27 February 2013, G/TBT/33: 2. GenevaGoogle Scholar

WTO (2005) World Trade Report 2005. GenevaGoogle Scholar

WTO (2012) World Trade Report 2012. GenevaGoogle Scholar

Appellate Body Report. European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, WT/DS135/AB/R, April 5, 2001, paras 66–70Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report. European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines, WT/DS231/AB/R, October 23, 2002Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report. United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes, WT/DS406/AB/R, April 4, 2012Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report. United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, WT/DS381/AB/R, May 16, 2012Google Scholar

Appellate Body Report. United States – Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements, WT/DS384/AB/R, WT/DS386/AB/R, June 29, 2012Google Scholar

Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres, WT/DS332Google Scholar

China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, WT/DS363Google Scholar

Panel Report. European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products, WT/DS135/R, September 18, 2000Google Scholar

Panel Report. EC – Trade Description of Sardines, WT/DS231/R, May 29, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panel Report. EU – Protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs (Australia), WT/DS290/R, March 15, 2005Google Scholar

Panel Report. United States – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes, WT/DS406/R, September 3, 2011Google Scholar

Panel Report. United States – Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products, WT/DS381/R, September 15, 2011Google Scholar

Panel Report. United States – Certain Country of Origin Labelling (COOL) Requirements, WT/DS384/R, WT/DS386/R, November 18, 2011Google Scholar