Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:36:24.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Logics of stratified identity management in world politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2019

Steven Ward Open the ORCID record for Steven Ward [Opens in a new window]
Steven Ward*
Affiliation:
Cornell University, 214 White Hall, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: smw347@cornell.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of concerns about status in world politics has rarely been as evident as it is today. Yet our understanding of how status dynamics influence politics and foreign policy remains limited. Dominant approaches draw on insights from social psychology about individual attitudes and behavior, but scale these up to build accounts of states as unitary or anthropomorphic actors. This results in serious theoretical problems and analytical blind spots. In this article, I offer a new framework – still rooted in social psychological insights about intergroup status dynamics – that addresses these problems. I recast the fundamental question from one about how states react to status dissatisfaction to one about how individuals – with different psychological profiles, different interests, and different positions within the national community – react to anxiety about the status of the state with they identify. I develop four broad logics that inform responses to national status dissatisfaction: identification change, emulation, transformation, and rejection. These logics subsume familiar arguments about how states seek status, but they also accommodate additional variation and explanatory possibilities. They thus constitute a more flexible framework that is better suited than existing alternatives to understand the full variety of ways in which status dynamics may influence world politics.

Keywords

statusidentitysocial psychology
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 211 - 238
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Dominic, and Grant, Peter. 2012. “Testing the Social Identity Relative Deprivation (SIRD) Model of Social Change: The Political Rise of Scottish Nationalism.” British Journal of Social Psychology 51(4):674–689.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stuart. 1981. Race and Rapprochement: Anglo-Saxonism and Anglo-American Relations, 1895–1904. Rutherford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Arredondo, Christopher Britt. 2005. Quixotism: The Imaginative Denial of Spain’s Loss of Empire. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Aydin, Cemil. 2007. The Politics of Anti-Westernism in Asia: Visions of World Order in Pan-Islamic and Pan-Asian Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Balcells, Albert. 1996. Catalan Nationalism: Past and Present. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
Balfour, Sebastian. 1996. “The Lion and the Pig’: Nationalism and National Identity in Fin-de-Siècle Spain.” In Nationalism and the Nation in the Iberian Peninsula, edited by Clare Mar-Molinero and Angel Smith, 107–17. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Balfour, Sebastian. 1997. The End of the Spanish Empire, 1898–1923. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barnhart, Joslyn. 2016. “Status Competition and Territorial Aggression: Evidence from the Scramble for Africa.” Security Studies 25(3):38–5419.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Paul. 2017. “Brexit, Retropia and the Perils of Post-Colonial Delusions.” Global Affairs 3(4–5):379–390.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2007. The Idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the Future of World Order, 1860–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, Friedrich. 1914a. Britain as Germany’s Vassal. London: Wm. Dawson & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, Friedrich. 1914b. Germany and the Next War. New York: Longman, Greens, and Co.Google Scholar
Blanz, Mathias, Mummendey, Amélie, Mielke, Rosemarie, and Klink, Andreas. 1998. “Responding to Negative Social Identity: A Taxonomy of Identity Management Strategies.” European Journal of Social Psychology 28:697–729.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen, and Wohlforth, William. 2016. America Abroad: The United States’ Global Role in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rupert., and Ross, Gordon. 1982. “The Battle for Acceptance: An Investigation into the Dynamics of Intergroup Behaviour.” In Social Identity and Integroup Relations, edited by H. Tajfel, 155–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryant, Janet. 2000. “France and NATO from 1966 to Kosovo: Coming full circle?” European Security 9(3):21–37.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Burges, Sean. 2008. “Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy After the Cold War.” International Relations 22(1):65–84.Google Scholar
Burkett, Jodi. 2013. Constructing Post-Imperial Britain: Britishness, ‘Race’ and the Radical Left in the 1960s. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burkman, Thomas W. 2008. Japan and the League of Nations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Charles. 1957. Anglo-American Understanding, 1898–1903. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Hallett E. 1946. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1938: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations . New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Cerny, Philip. 1980. The Politics of Grandeur: Ideological Aspects of de Gaulle’s Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clunan, Anne. 2009. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations, Identity, and Security Interests. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Clunan, Anne. 2014. “Historical Aspirations and the Domestic Politics of Russia’s Pursuit of International Status.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47(3–4):281–290.Google Scholar
Dafoe, Allan, Renshon, Jonathan, and Huth, Paul. 2014. “Reputation and Status as Motives for War.” Annual Review of Political Science 17:371–393.Google Scholar
Devos, T., Silver, L., Mackie, D., and Smith, E.R.. 2003. “Experiencing Intergroup Emotions.”.” In From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions: Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups, edited by D. Mackie and E.R. Smith, 111–34. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Doosje, Bertjan, Spears, Russell, and Ellemers, Naomi. 2002. “Social Identity as Both Cause and Effect: The Development of Group Identification in Response to Anticipated and Actual Changes in the Intergroup Status Hierarchy.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41:57–76.Google Scholar
Ellemers, Naomi, Spears, Russell, and Doosje, Bertjan. 1997. “Sticking Together or Falling Apart: Group Identification as a Psychological Determinant of Group Commitment Versus Individual Mobility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:617–626.Google Scholar
Evers, Miles. 2017. “On Transgression.” International Studies Quarterly 61:786–794.Google Scholar
Federico, Christopher, and de Zavala, Agnieszka G.. 2018. “Collective Narcissism and the 2016 US Presidential Vote.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82(1):110–121.Google Scholar
Freedman, Joshua. 2016. “Status Insecurity and Temporality in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 22(4):797–822.Google Scholar
Gaertner, Sameul, Dovidio, John, Anastasio, Phyllis, Bachman, Betty, and Rust, Mary. 1993. “The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias.” European Review of Social Psychology 4(1):1–26.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E., and Nexon, Daniel H.. 2018. “Kim Jong Un Gets to Sit at the Cool Table Now.” Foreign Policy, June, 21, https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/06/21/kim-jong-un-gets-to-sit-at-the-cool-table-now/ Google Scholar
Grant, Peter. 2008. “The Protest Intentions of Skilled Immigrants with Credentialing Problems: A Test of a Model Integrating Relative Deprivation Theory with Social Identity Theory.” British Journal of Social Psychology 47(4):687–705.Google Scholar
Gwynn, Stephen, ed. 1929. The Letters and Friendships of Sir Cecil Spring Rice, 2 vols. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Halper, Stefan, and Clarke, Jonathan. 2004. American Alone: The Neoconservatives and the Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael, and Abrams, Dominic. 1988. Social Identifications: A Social Pyschology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hotta, Eri. 2007. Pan-Asianism and Japan’s War, 1931–1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hotta, Eri. 2011. “Konoe Fumimaro: A Call to Reject the Anglo-American Centered Peace, 1918.” In Pan-Asianism, A Documentary History Volume 1:1850–1920, edited by Sven Saaler and Christopher Szpilmans, 311–18. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Junco, José Alvarez. 1996. “The Nation-Building Process in Nineteenth-Century Spain.” In Nationalism and the Nation in the Iberian Peninsula, edited by Clare Mar-Molinero and Angel Smith, 89–106. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Kenny, Michael, and Pearce, Nick. 2018. Shadows of Empire: The Anglosphere in British Politics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kolodziej, Edward. 1974. French International Policy under de Gaulle and Pompidou: The Politics of Grandeur. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah, and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2003. “Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy.” International Organization 57(1):77–109.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah, and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2010. “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy.” International Security 34(4):63–95.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah, and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2014. “Managing Rising Powers: The Role of Status Concerns.” In Status in World Politics, edited by T.V. Paul, Deborah Larson and William Wohlforth, 33–57. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2016. National Identities and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2018. “Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?” The Journal of Politics 80(1):59–70.Google Scholar
McCourt, David. 2014. Britain and World Power Since 1945: Constructing a Nation’s Role in International Politics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McCrone, David. 1997. “Unmasking Britannia: The Rise and Fall of British National Identity.” Nations and Nationalism 3(4):579–596.Google Scholar
Miller, Chatterjee M. 2013. “India’s Feeble Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 92(3):14–19.Google Scholar
Mummendey, Amelie, Kessler, Thomas, Klink, Andreas, and Mielke, Rosemarie. 1999. “Strategies to Cope with Negative Social Identity: Predictions by Social Identity Theory and Relative Deprivation Theory.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(2):229.Google Scholar
Murray, Michelle. 2010. “Identity, Insecurity, and Great Power Politics: The Tragedy of German Naval Ambition Before the First World War.” Security Studies 19(4):656–688.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Robert Paul, and Nexon, Daniel. 2018. “Defending Hierarchy from the Moon the Indian Ocean: Symbolic Capital and Political Dominance in Early Modern China and the Cold War.” International Organization 72(3):591–626.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana. 2018. “Status Threat, not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(16):E4330–39.Google Scholar
Nairn, Tom. 1977. The Break-Up of Britain: Crisis and Neo-Nationalism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2014. “Status Is Cultural: Durkheiman Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great-Power Status.” In Status in World Politics, edited by William Wohlforth, Deborah Larson and T.V. Paul, 85–112. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H., and Neumann, Iver. 2017. “Hegemonic-order Theory: A Field-Theoretic Account.” European Journal of International Relations 24(3):662–686.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jimmi O., and Stuart, Ward. 2015. “Three Referenda and a By-election: The Shadow of Empire in Devolutionary Politics.” In Scotland, Empire, and Decolonisation in the Twentieth Century, edited by John MacKenzie and Bryan Glass, 200–22. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Onea, Tudor. 2014. “Between Dominance and Decline: Status Anxiety and Great Power Rivalry.” Review of International Studies 40(1):125–152.Google Scholar
Paul, T.V. 2016. “The Accommodation of Rising Powers in World Politics.” In Accommodating Rising Powers: Past, Present, and Future, edited by T.V. Paul, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah, and Wohlforth, William. eds. 2014. Status in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pu, Xiaoyu. 2017. “Ambivalent Accommodation: Status Signaling of a Rising India and China’s Response.” International Affairs 93(1):147–163.Google Scholar
Rawlings, Helen. 2012. The Debate on the Decline of Spain. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2015. “Losing Face and Sinking Costs: Experimental Evidence on the Judgment of Political and Military Leaders.” International Organization 69(3):659–695.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2016. “Status Deficits and War.” International Organization 70(3):513–550.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2017. Fighting for Status: Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rhamey, Patrick, and Early, Bryan. 2013. “Going for the Gold: Status-Seeking Behavior and Olympic Performance.” International Area Studies Review 16(3):244–261. Google Scholar
Romero-Salvadó, Francisco J. 1996. “The Failure of the Liberal Project of the Spanish Nation-State, 1909–1938.” In Nationalism and the Nation in the Iberian Peninsula , edited by Clare Mar-Molinero and Angel Smith, 119–32. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott. 1996. “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb.” International Security 21(3):54–86.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas, Skaperdas, Stergios, and Wohlforth, William. 2015. “Nation-Building Through War.” American Political Science Review 109(2):279–296.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Hugh. 1980. “Aftermaths of Empire.” Journal of Contemporary History 15(1):197–208.Google Scholar
Shimazu, Naoko. 1998. Japan, Race and Equality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. 1999. “Affective and Cognitive Implications of Group Becoming Part of the Self: New Models of Prejudice and of the Self-Concept.” In Social Identity and Social Cognition, edited by D. Abrams and M. Hogg, 183–96. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spears, Russell, Doosje, Bertjan, and Ellemers, Naomi. 1997. “Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23:538–553.Google Scholar
Stekelenburg, Jacquelien, Klandermans, Bert, and Dijk, Wilco Van. 2011. “Combining Motivations and Emotion: The Motivational Dynamics of Protest Participation.” Revist Psicologia Social 26(1):91–104.Google Scholar
Stokes, Doug. 2018. “Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order.” International Affairs 94(1):133–150.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kate. 2015. “India’s Ambivalent Projection of Self as a Global Power: Between Compliance and Resistance.” In Competing Visions of India in World Politics, edited by Kate Sullivan, 15–33. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2008. “Seeking ‘Legitimate’ Great Power Status in Post-Cold War International Society: China’s and Japan’s Participation in UNPKO.” International Relations 22(1):45–63.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1978a. “Interindividual Behaviour and Intergroup Behaviour.” In Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , edited by H. Tajfel, 27–60. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1978b. “Social Categorization, Social Identity, and Social Comparison.” In Differentation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , edited by H. Tajfel, 61–76. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C.. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , edited by William Austin and Stephen Worchel. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tankha, Brij. 2006. Kita Ikki and the Making of Modern Japan: A Vision of Empire. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Terman, Rochelle. 2017. “Rewarding Resistance: Theorizing Defiance to International Norms.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Zomeren, Martijn, Leach, Colin W., and Spears, Rusell. 2010. “Does Group Efficacy Increase Group Identification? Resolving their Paradoxical Relationship.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(6):1055–1060.Google Scholar
Vickers, Rhiannon. 2011. “The Labour Party and the World.” In Labour’s Foreign Policy Since 1951 , vol. 2. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Volgy, Thomas, Corbetta, Renato, Rhamey, Patrick, Baird, Ryan, and Grant, Keith. 2014. “Status Considerations in International Politics and the Rise of Regional Powers.” In Status in World Politics , edited by Deborah Larson, T.V. Paul and William Wohlforth, 58–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vucetic, Srdjan. 2011. The Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven. 2013. “Race, Status, and Japanese Revisionism in the Early 1930s.” Security Studies 22(4):607–639.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven. 2017a. “Lost in Translation: Social Identity Theory and the Study of Status in World Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 61(4):821–834.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven. 2017b. Status and the Challenge of Rising Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven. 2018. Undone by Decline: Status Anxiety and Partisan Animosity in the United States.” Annual meeting of the European International Studies Association, Prague, Czech Republic, September 12–15.Google Scholar
Ward, Steven. Forthcoming. “Status, Stratified Rights, and Accommodation in World Politics.” Journal of Global Security Studies.Google Scholar
Wolf, Reinhard. 2017. “Donald Trump’s Status-Driven Foreign Policy.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 59(5):99–116.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zell, Ethan, and Allicke, Mark. 2010. “Comparisons Over Time: Temporal Trajectories, Social Comparison, and Self-Evaluation.” European Journal of Social Psychology 40:375–382.Google Scholar