Guidelines may improve clinical outcomes for depression, but whether they are followed in primary care is uncertain.

To assess general practioners (GPs’) adherence to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for managing depression in adults (2004).

Anonymized Questionnaire Survey.

Thirty-eight partnerships within one primary care trust in England.

Focused questionnaire incorporating measurable criteria, posted to GPs in May 2007.

The response rate was 67% (143/215 GPs). GPs followed NICE guidelines when screening for depression in patients with physical illness, using selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants appropriately and referring to counselling and secondary care. However, 48% GPs did not screen patients with a history of depression, 44% discontinued medication too soon and 38% avoided prescribing for ‘understandable’ moderate depression. GPs identified poor access to cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) as the greatest barrier to implementing guidelines. Only 41% personally used CBT. Adherence to NICE guidelines was significantly higher for GPs trained in psychiatry and in younger GPs, but was not associated with gender, practice size, possessing the Membership of the Royal College of General Practitioners or reading guidelines. Less than half (38%) of the GPs rated NICE as having a moderate or substantial impact upon their clinical management. The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) had more influence than NICE guidelines upon detection and recording of care, especially in larger practices.

Training more cognitive behaviour therapists, making psychiatry experience mandatory for future GPs and focusing QOF incentives upon treatment outcomes as well as screening may improve adherence to NICE depression guidelines.

The aim of this study was to explore the awareness and views of members of the ethnic minority community towards primary health care interpreting provision in two localities in Hertfordshire.

Ethnic minority groups often have to undertake many aspects of their day-to-day lives with limited English. The provision of high quality language interpretation services is vital for enabling access to public services, including healthcare. The use of accredited or professional interpreters has been minimal within primary care and undermines the principle of equity in the National Health Service. The local Primary Care Trust and ethnic minority forums initiated this study.

The overall research design was qualitative and data collection was undertaken using focus groups. Twenty-four participants from the Pakistani (Punjabi and Urdu speakers), Bangladeshi (Bengali speakers) and Chinese (Cantonese and Mandarin speakers) communities took part in one of five focus groups. Ethnic minority members recruited participants, conducted the focus groups and translated the interviews after receiving in-depth training.

Participants were unaware that healthcare professionals could access interpreting provision for their primary health care consultations, which were usually managed with the assistance of family members (including children) and friends. Both the appropriateness of using children and the potential compromising of confidentiality and privacy when using friends to interpret were concerns. Women discussed inventing illnesses rather than talking openly about embarrassing health issues in front of their children or husbands, which they suggested, may lead to depression or other mental health problems. Trust, accuracy, independence and confidentiality were important attributes participants expected in a professional interpreter whom they would prefer was from their own gender and culture.

An increasing number of blood tests are being performed in primary care. Informing patients of results takes up a considerable proportion of practice-staff time. The use of new technologies may be more time-efficient for staff but little is known about the acceptability to patients.

To determine patient attitudes towards the use of three technologies – short message service (SMS), webpage and e-mail – for the delivery of laboratory results.

Structured interview.

Two hundred patients were interviewed in two general practices in Lothian, Scotland. Satisfaction with current methods and preferred methods of obtaining test-results were assessed. Patients were asked about their current access to different technologies and their favourability to using such technologies for receiving results and their views on appropriate content and information security. Results were analyzed by age, sex and educational attainment using χ2 test.

A total of 79.5% of patients had mobile phones, 53% used SMS, 46.5% had internet, and 37.5% used e-mail. E-mail, SMS and webpage was the favoured delivery system for 53.3%, 37.1% and 33.3%, respectively.

Patients were favourable towards e-mail but not SMS or a webpage. The main concern over the three technologies was information security. New technology may be useful for delivering results but patients will have to be persuaded that any such system is reliable and secure.

Osteoporosis is a chronic and progressive disease leading to gradual deterioration of skeletal tissue, which predisposes the sufferer to an increased risk of fracture, deformity, disability and even premature death. The growth of this ‘silent epidemic’ is projected to escalate worldwide with the changing demographics of an ageing population. Recent reviews have highlighted the frequency of missed opportunities for secondary prevention following a fracture, though these reported on practice in the mid-1990s when pharmacologic approaches to fracture reduction were in transition.

This review examines the current body of literature regarding the investigation of osteoporosis and prescribing of secondary bone prevention medication in older patients following fragility fractures.

A standard Boolean search framework was used to find all pertinent studies on the literature review question. A further set of results was obtained using a ‘snowballing’ technique by pursuing references of the initial studies and reviews found. As the aim was to determine if there have been changes in prescription rates in elderly patients in the light of new guidelines, studies were excluded if they had featured in recent systematic reviews.

The consistently low intervention rates reported in all included studies provide evidence that elderly individuals who experience fragility fractures are still not receiving adequate investigation or treatment for osteoporosis. Furthermore, this review has identified the potential for future research to describe the true extent of this problem in the UK.

To assess current primary care childhood obesity prevention activity and experiences of general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in delivering the ‘Mealtime Magic’ brief intervention. To determine the acceptability of the brief intervention and reported impact upon confidence and behaviour of parents.

A gap persists in the evidence base regarding brief childhood obesity prevention interventions in primary care, where good opportunities for primary prevention work lie.

A quantitative and qualitative evaluation design, without control group, with post-intervention evaluation of parental outcomes and ‘before and after’ evaluation of healthcare professional perspectives was employed, using questionnaires. Five primary care practices in Worcestershire, England took part: six GPs, seven practice nurses (11 females and two males). 110 of 223 parents receiving the intervention completed follow-up measures (107 females, two males and one gender unknown; 106 White British). The intervention involved providing the ‘Mealtime Magic’ leaflet regarding childhood healthy eating behaviours, with verbal reinforcement of three main messages, to all parents with children aged five years and younger presenting to primary care over a six-week period. Staff received a 30-minute training session.

Twelve of 13 health professionals ranked childhood obesity of importance relative to other priorities. Secondary prevention activities were undertaken more frequently than primary prevention. All professionals found the intervention easy to deliver; 12 of 13 stated they would use the leaflet in the future. Reported professional confidence in knowledge of evidence-based healthy eating behaviour messages increased following intervention delivery. Resource barriers and perceived parental sensitivity with subject were reported. Ninety two percent (100/109) of parents stated the leaflet was helpful. Up to 52% (57/110) of parents reported more confidence regarding leaflet suggestions and up to 47% (49/105) reported positive behaviour changes. Evaluation of brief intervention approaches may help address perceived barriers to undertaking childhood obesity prevention work in primary care in the UK.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of hygiene routines and characteristics of the daycare centre (DCC) on sickness absence in preschool children.

In Sweden most children attend daycare outside home during daytime. Daycare outside home results in cognitive and social gains for the children, but it also increases the risk of infectious symptoms. About 17%–30% of the respiratory tract infections in preschool children are due to the daycare stay. Factors of importance for sickness absence in DCC have been studied earlier but no study has had a broader focus on routines and daycare characteristics at the same.

In 2003–2004 a national sample of 138 DCCs were visited by a study nurses who assisted in filling in a questionnaire on hygiene routines and daycare characteristics. Thereafter the DCC reported sickness absence on group level during two weeks in the autumn and two weeks in the spring.

Sickness absence was about 10% both in the autumn and in the spring. Only about 10% of the DCC had written rules about hand washing in children but almost all had unwritten rules. More than 50 children at the DCC and no regular contact with the child health centres were found to be of significant importance for sickness absence using a multiple logistic regression model.

To explore the perspectives of both professionals and older people on modifiable health behaviours and risks in later life.

Promotion of health and prevention of disability in later life are major health policy priorities across Europe. A system for health risk appraisal in later life, health risk appraisal in older people (HRA-O) permits a population-wide assessment to be carried out. The HRA-O technology is a single assessment process-based questionnaire, which generates a computer decision support system, to offer tailored advice about modifying health risks and behaviours.

Qualitative study using nominal groups and interviews.

General practices, National Health Service and local government social services, and voluntary organisations in two London boroughs.

Nominal groups were recruited from general practice, older people’s forums, voluntary organisations and social services departments, and individual interviews were carried out with health and social care commissioners, clinicians, professionals and public health practitioners, which discussed the HRA-O questionnaire.

Public and professional evaluation identified necessary refinements of the HRA-O technology, the need for greater insight into the social psychology of ageing on the part of those engaged in health promotion, and the necessary and appropriate involvement of professionals in reinforcing health promotion advice.

This study discusses the findings from the nominal groups and interviews in the light of the technology’s failure to change self-reported behaviour and places them in the context of current approaches to health promotion for older populations.