Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:13:57.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi infecting raccoons (Procyon lotor) in 2 metropolitan areas of southern Louisiana: implications for parasite transmission networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2023

Alicia Majeau
Affiliation:
Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
Erin Cloherty
Affiliation:
New Orleans Mosquito, Rodent, and Termite Control, New Orleans, LA, USA
A. Nikki Anderson
Affiliation:
Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Susanne C. Straif-Bourgeois
Affiliation:
Louisiana Health Sciences Center, School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
Eric Dumonteil
Affiliation:
Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
Claudia Herrera*
Affiliation:
Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Claudia Herrera, E-mail: cherrera@tulane.edu

Abstract

Trypanosoma cruzi, the aetiological agent of Chagas disease, exists as an anthropozoonosis in Louisiana. Raccoons are an important reservoir, as they demonstrate high prevalence and maintain high parasitaemia longer than other mammals. Given the complex nature of parasite transmission networks and importance of raccoons as reservoirs that move between sylvatic and domestic environments, detailing the genetic diversity of T. cruzi in raccoons is crucial to assess risk to human health. Using a next-generation sequencing approach targeting the mini-exon, parasite diversity was assessed in 2 metropolitan areas of Louisiana. Sequences were analysed along with those previously identified in other mammals and vectors to determine if any association exists between ecoregion and parasite diversity. Parasites were identified from discrete typing units (DTUs) TcI, TcII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI. DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI are previously unreported in raccoons in the United States (US). TcI was the most abundant DTU, comprising nearly 80% of all sequences. All but 1 raccoon harboured multiple haplotypes, some demonstrating mixed infections of different DTUs. Furthermore, there is significant association between DTU distribution and level III ecoregion in Louisiana. Finally, while certain sequences were distributed across multiple tissues, others appeared to have tissue-specific tropism. Taken together, these findings indicate that ongoing surveillance of T. cruzi in the US should be undertaken across ecoregions to fully assess risk to human health. Given potential connections between parasite diversity and clinical outcomes, deep sequencing technologies are crucial and interventions targeting raccoons may prove useful in mitigating human health risk.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

In southern Louisiana, and across the southern United States (US), Trypanosoma cruzi infection exists as an important anthropozoonosis, prevalent in both wildlife and domestically maintained species in this region. Infection has been reported in rodents, dogs, cats, non-human primates and even a domestic llama in the state (Pronovost et al., Reference Pronovost, Peterson, Chavez, Blum, Dumonteil and Herrera2018; Elmayan et al., Reference Elmayan, Tu, Duhon, Marx, Wolfson, Balsamo, Herrera and Dumonteil2019; Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Majeau, Didier, Falkenstein and Dumonteil2019a; Dumonteil et al., Reference Dumonteil, Desale, Tu, Duhon, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2021; Thompson et al., Reference Thompson, Habrun, Scully, Sasaki, Bauer, Jania, Baker, Chapman, Majeau, Pronovost, Dumonteil and Herrera2021). Transmission occurs through contact with infected feces of Triatoma sanguisuga insects, the primary vector in the state, though both oral transmission resulting from ingestion of infected insects and congenital transmission have also been suggested to contribute to wildlife infection (Roellig et al., Reference Roellig, Ellis and Yabsley2009b; Kribs-Zaleta, Reference Kribs-Zaleta2010). Though infrequent, autochthonous transmission to humans has been reported in the state (Dorn et al., Reference Dorn, Perniciaro, Yabsley, Roellig, Balsamo, Diaz and Wesson2007).

Trypanosoma cruzi is a generalist parasite known to infect a great diversity of mammalian species with recent evidence also suggesting infection of certain avian species (Martínez-Hernández et al., Reference Martínez-Hernández, Oria-Martínez, Rendón-Franco, Villalobos and Muñoz-García2022). Furthermore, the parasite itself is highly genetically diverse and is currently classified into 7 distinct lineages or discrete typing units (DTUs): TcI–TcVI and the more recently described TcBat (Zingales et al., Reference Zingales, Andrade, Briones, Campbell, Chiari, Fernandes, Guhl, Lages-Silva, Macedo, Machado, Miles, Romanha, Sturm, Tibayrenc, Schijman and Second Satellite2009; Marcili et al., Reference Marcili, Lima, Cavazzana, Junqueira, Veludo, Maia Da Silva, Campaner, Paiva, Nunes and Teixeira2009a; Lima et al., Reference Lima, Espinosa-Álvarez, Hamilton, Neves, Takata, Campaner, Attias, de Souza, Camargo and Teixeira2013). Further complicating the picture of genetic diversity, 2 of these lineages, namely TcV and TcVI, arose from hybridization events of TcII and TcIII. There is also increasingly recognized intra-lineage diversity, with DTU TcI subdivided into TcIa–e (Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Bargues, Fajardo, Montilla, Triana, Vallejo and Guhl2007; Falla et al., Reference Falla, Herrera, Fajardo, Montilla, Vallejo and Guhl2009; Cura et al., Reference Cura, Mejia-Jaramillo, Duffy, Burgos, Rodriguero, Cardinal, Kjos, Gurgel-Goncalves, Blanchet, De Pablos, Tomasini, da Silva, Russomando, Cuba, Aznar, Abate, Levin, Osuna, Gurtler, Diosque, Solari, Triana-Chavez and Schijman2010) and TcIV structured into distinct lineages in North and South America (Marcili et al., Reference Marcili, Lima, Valente, Valente, Batista, Junqueira, Souza, da Rosa, Campaner, Lewis, Llewellyn, Miles and Teixeira2009b; Lewis et al., Reference Lewis, Llewellyn, Yeo, Acosta, Gaunt and Miles2011; Flores-López et al., Reference Flores-López, Mitchell, Reisenman, Sarkar, Williamson and Machado2022).

Accordingly, transmission networks are complex and difficult to elucidate. While parasite diversity has been proposed to be associated with geography, particular ecology, host specificity and clinical prognosis of human infections (Llewellyn et al., Reference Llewellyn, Miles, Carrasco, Lewis, Yeo, Vargas, Torrico, Diosque, Valente, Valente and Gaunt2009; Marcili et al., Reference Marcili, Lima, Valente, Valente, Batista, Junqueira, Souza, da Rosa, Campaner, Lewis, Llewellyn, Miles and Teixeira2009b; Zingales et al., Reference Zingales, Miles, Campbell, Tibayrenc, Macedo, Teixeira, Schijman, Llewellyn, Lages-Silva, Machado, Andrade and Sturm2012; Messenger et al., Reference Messenger, Miles and Bern2015; Izeta-Alberdi et al., Reference Izeta-Alberdi, Ibarra-Cerdena, Moo-Llanes and Ramsey2016), clear associations have been difficult to establish. Recent work in Louisiana has evidenced that several mammalian hosts are involved in shared transmission networks, including dogs, rodents and others (Dumonteil et al., Reference Dumonteil, Elmayan, Majeau, Tu, Duhon, Marx, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2020a, Reference Dumonteil, Pronovost, Bierman, Sanford, Majeau, Moore and Herrera2020b). Thus, a better understanding of local transmission networks is a critical piece towards accurately assessing how parasite diversity affects the risk of both infection and disease in humans.

Though early reports of T. cruzi genotypes circulating in the US identified only DTUs TcI and TcIV (Bern et al., Reference Bern, Kjos, Yabsley and Montgomery2011), DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI have been identified in more recent years. Indeed, parasites from the closely related DTUs II/V/VI were identified in autochthonous human cases in Texas in a blood donor study, though exact DTU could not be determined given the sequencing approach used (Garcia et al., Reference Garcia, Burroughs, Gorchakov, Gunter, Dumonteil, Murray and Herrera2017). With the advent of next-generation sequencing approaches that allow for the identification of multiple genotypes per sample as well as low-frequency genotypes, the presence of DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI was also confirmed in wild and domestic animals in Louisiana (Pronovost et al., Reference Pronovost, Peterson, Chavez, Blum, Dumonteil and Herrera2018; Dumonteil et al., Reference Dumonteil, Elmayan, Majeau, Tu, Duhon, Marx, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2020a, Reference Dumonteil, Pronovost, Bierman, Sanford, Majeau, Moore and Herrera2020b, Reference Dumonteil, Desale, Tu, Duhon, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2021).

It has been more than 60 years since T. cruzi was first reported in raccoons (Procyon lotor) in the US (Walton et al., Reference Walton, Bauman, Diamond and Herman1958), and as genotyping efforts have been made throughout that time, raccoons have been described as predominantly or even almost exclusively infected with TcIV with a few known exceptions of TcI infection (Barnabé et al., Reference Barnabé, Yaeger, Pung and Tibayrenc2001; Roellig et al., Reference Roellig, Brown, Barnabé, Tibayrenc, Steurer and Yabsley2008, Reference Roellig, Savage, Fujita, Barnabe, Tibayrenc, Steurer and Yabsley2013; Bi et al., Reference Bi, Groce and Davis2010; Bern et al., Reference Bern, Kjos, Yabsley and Montgomery2011; Curtis-Robles et al., Reference Curtis-Robles, Lewis and Hamer2016; Vandermark et al., Reference Vandermark, Zieman, Boyles, Nielsen, Davis and Jimenez2018; Hodo et al., Reference Hodo, Bañuelos, Edwards, Wozniak and Hamer2020). These genotyping studies include raccoons from Florida, Georgia, Texas, Maryland, Tennessee, Kentucky, Illinois and Louisiana. Notably, one previously characterized raccoon isolate from the Orleans Parish (NOLA) area in Louisiana was determined to be TcI (Barnabé et al., Reference Barnabé, Yaeger, Pung and Tibayrenc2001). Though sample sizes have tended to be too small for these studies to make concrete associations, it has been repeatedly suggested that raccoons have a particular susceptibility for infection with TcIV, and to a lesser extent TcI. However, it has also been demonstrated experimentally that raccoons are competent hosts for DTU TcII as well as TcI and TcIV (Roellig et al., Reference Roellig, Ellis and Yabsley2009a).

Previously, raccoons were reported as an important reservoir species for T. cruzi in 2 metropolitan areas of southern Louisiana, with infection prevalence reaching nearly 43% (Majeau et al., Reference Majeau, Pronovost, Sanford, Cloherty, Anderson, Balsamo, Gee, Straif-Bourgeois and Herrera2020). Beyond having one of the highest T. cruzi prevalence rates among mammalian hosts, raccoons also maintain a high parasitaemia for up to 5 weeks post infection (Roellig et al., Reference Roellig, Ellis and Yabsley2009a; Bern et al., Reference Bern, Kjos, Yabsley and Montgomery2011). Considering the peridomestic nature of these animals and their proximity to humans, along with evidence of vectors feeding frequently on both raccoons and humans (Waleckx et al., Reference Waleckx, Suarez, Richards and Dorn2014; Gorchakov et al., Reference Gorchakov, Trosclair, Wozniak, Feria, Garcia, Gunter and Murray2016; Dumonteil et al., Reference Dumonteil, Pronovost, Bierman, Sanford, Majeau, Moore and Herrera2020b), raccoons may well contribute to an increased risk of T. cruzi infection in humans and it is important to further elucidate the role of raccoons in local transmission cycles. Thus, T. cruzi genetic diversity was assessed in raccoons from southern Louisiana through deep sequencing of mini-exon amplicons derived from hearts and colons, to better understand the role of raccoons in local transmission cycles.

Materials and methods

Study population

Raccoons were sampled with a convenience method, including nuisance reports for raccoons in close proximity to humans and domestic animals, and tested for parasite infection with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as described previously (Majeau et al., Reference Majeau, Pronovost, Sanford, Cloherty, Anderson, Balsamo, Gee, Straif-Bourgeois and Herrera2020). Briefly, between October 2014 and August 2018, raccoons were trapped, euthanized and necropsied from 46 trapping sites across 2 metropolitan areas in Louisiana approximately 130 km apart (Baton Rouge, BR and New Orleans, NOLA). Hearts and colons were collected and maintained at −20° until DNA extraction and PCR targeting both the satellite region and the mini-exon. Forty of the 119 raccoons collected were previously confirmed to be PCR-positive in at least 1 tissue (Majeau et al., Reference Majeau, Pronovost, Sanford, Cloherty, Anderson, Balsamo, Gee, Straif-Bourgeois and Herrera2020) and used for genotyping, 27 from NOLA and 13 from BR. All sequences used for genotyping were mini-exon amplicons.

Amplification and sequencing

For genotyping, parasite DNA was amplified using 2 protocols targeting the mini-exon sequence (Souto et al., Reference Souto, Fernandes, Macedo, Campbell and Zingales1996; Majeau et al., Reference Majeau, Herrera, Dumonteil, Gómez and Buscaglia2019). Amplicons resulting from these 2 protocols were pooled for each sample and purified using the Invitrogen PureLink kit. Following end-repair and indexing, libraries were prepared and sequenced on a MiSeq (Illumina, Applied Biological Materials Inc. (abm) | #1-3671 Viking Way, Richmond, BC, V6V 2J5, Canada) platform.

Sequence analysis

Sequences were analysed using Geneious Prime software. Raw Fastq reads were mapped to reference mini-exon sequences representing each of the 7 DTUs, including TcI Raccoon70 (EF576837), TcII Tu18 (AY367125.1), TcIII M6241 (AF050522), TcIV MT4167 (AF050523), TcV MN (AY367128.1), TcVI CL (U57984) and TcBat TCC949cl3Bra (KT305873). Poor quality reads and those representing less than 1% of reads were removed and sequence variants were identified for each DTU using the FreeBayes/Find SNPs plugin. Sequences were deposited into GenBank under accession numbers OP311929–OP312049.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed using PHYML as implemented in phylogeny.fr including separate iterations of trees for DTU TcI only, DTUs TcII/TcV/TcVI only and DTU TcIV only. Mini-exon sequences from triatomine vectors, dogs, cats, rodents, non-human primates and humans from North America (Pronovost et al., Reference Pronovost, Peterson, Chavez, Blum, Dumonteil and Herrera2018; Villanueva-Lizama et al., Reference Villanueva-Lizama, Teh-Poot, Majeau, Herrera and Dumonteil2019; Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Majeau, Didier, Falkenstein and Dumonteil2019a; Dumonteil et al., Reference Dumonteil, Elmayan, Majeau, Tu, Duhon, Marx, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2020a, Reference Dumonteil, Pronovost, Bierman, Sanford, Majeau, Moore and Herrera2020b, Reference Dumonteil, Desale, Tu, Duhon, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2021) were also included for comparison.

Sequence read counts for each haplotype were used to calculate the proportions of both haplotypes and DTUs for each individual raccoon tissue sample to assess parasite diversity in raccoons and between the 2 metropolitan areas. For a broader analysis across southern Louisiana, T. cruzi DTU cumulative proportions from triatomine vectors, dogs, cats, rodents, non-human primate hosts (Pronovost et al., Reference Pronovost, Peterson, Chavez, Blum, Dumonteil and Herrera2018; Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Majeau, Didier, Falkenstein and Dumonteil2019a; Dumonteil et al., Reference Dumonteil, Elmayan, Majeau, Tu, Duhon, Marx, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2020a, Reference Dumonteil, Pronovost, Bierman, Sanford, Majeau, Moore and Herrera2020b, Reference Dumonteil, Desale, Tu, Duhon, Wolfson, Balsamo and Herrera2021) and racoons (this study) were calculated for 20 parishes in Louisiana for which data were available, and associated with the corresponding level III ecoregions based on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) classification (Daigle et al., Reference Daigle, Griffith, Omernik, Faulkner, McCulloh, Handley, Smith and Chapman2006). The following parishes were included Ascension, Calcasieu, De Soto, East Baton Rouge, Iberia, Jackson, Lafourche, Livingston, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. John, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa, Vernon, Walker, Washington and West Baton Rouge. Differences in DTU proportion among ecoregions was assessed by χ 2 test. A map of DTU distribution according to ecoregions was elaborated in qGIS.

Finally, phylogenetic trees were constructed to investigate parasite diversity distribution across the heart and colon within the same raccoon hosts. For each raccoon with high-quality T. cruzi sequences isolated from both heart and colon samples, sequences were aligned with reference sequences and maximum likelihood trees constructed, as above.

Results

Given the importance of raccoons as a reservoir for the T. cruzi parasite, the full diversity of parasites infecting racoons in 2 metropolitan areas of Louisiana was identified through next-generation sequencing. From a total of 40 T. cruzi-positive raccoons, sequences from 29 tissue samples across 25 individual raccoons (62.5%) were successfully genotyped. Of these, 13 raccoons were from NOLA and 12 were from BR. After filtering as described above, a total of 121 haplotypes were recovered from all racoon tissue samples, 98 of which were unique to a single raccoon and 23 of which were found in multiple samples. Between 1 and 12 haplotypes were recovered per raccoon (mean = 4.84, median = 4). On average, a similar number of haplotypes were recovered per raccoon at each of the 2 sites, with a mean of 4.6 haplotypes per raccoon in BR and a mean of 4.0 haplotypes per raccoon in NOLA. Although a greater number of hearts than colons were both found to be infected and successfully genotyped, the number of haplotypes recovered from each tissue type was similar. Between 1 and 10 haplotypes were found per heart (mean = 4.5, median = 4) while between 2 and 8 haplotypes were found per colon (mean = 4, median = 4). Two raccoons from each metropolitan area (NOLA and BR) had high-quality T. cruzi sequences isolated from both their hearts and colons, resulting in a total of 4 raccoons with paired samples data.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny trees were constructed using all parasite sequences identified in raccoon samples, along with reference sequences from each DTU and additional T. cruzi sequences previously identified in mammals and vectors from North America. A greater parasite diversity than previously reported was found to be infecting raccoons in Louisiana, with TcI, TcII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI being detected (Fig. 1), although the majority of sequences belonged to TcI DTU. Separate iterations of maximum likelihood phylogeny trees were constructed for DTU TcI (Fig. 1A), DTUs TcII/TcV/TcVI (Fig. 1B) and DTU TcIV (Fig. 1C) to better visualize intra-lineage diversity and better resolve the closely related DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI.

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood trees of T. cruzi mini-exon sequences. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed for raccoon sequences identified as TcI (A), TcII/TcV/TcVI (B) and TcIV (C), with reference sequences (asterisks) and sequences from other mammals and vectors included for each iteration (black). Most TcI sequences (A) from both NOLA (orange) and BR (red) were TcIa and closely related to other TcIa sequences from local vectors, though TcIb was also identified in NOLA. All 3 of the closely related DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI were identified in raccoons in NOLA (B), with TcII sequences in green, TcV sequences in pink and TcVI sequences in blue. TcIV sequences (C) were identified in both NOLA (dark blue) and BR (light blue), with all sequences clustering closely with the North American TcIV sequence.

Many of the TcI sequences from both NOLA and BR were closely related and clustered with TcIa reference sequences (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, these sequences also clustered with TcIa sequences derived from local triatomine vectors as well as other mammals in Louisiana, confirming that raccoons are an important part of local transmission cycles. Sequences from 1 NOLA raccoon also clustered with TcIb reference sequences and sequences from a vector in Mexico. There did not appear to be any TcIc, TcId or TcIe present in raccoons from either metropolitan area. While there appears to be some degree of clustering of TcI sequences by location between the 2 metropolitan regions, identical or very closely related sequences were also found in both NOLA and BR.

Parasites from TcII, TcV and TcVI DTUs were identified only in raccoons from NOLA but not in BR (Fig. 1B). Within each DTU, sequences from raccoons clustered closely with sequences from triatomine vectors and other mammals in Louisiana, providing further evidence of ongoing peridomestic transmission cycles in the US involving these parasite lineages, at least in the NOLA area.

The analysis of TcIV sequences (Fig. 1C) indicated that sequences from raccoons from both NOLA and BR clustered closely with other TcIV strains from the US yet distinctly from the Brazilian/South American TcIV reference strain.

Next, the proportion of parasite haplotypes and DTUs was compared across individual raccoon samples and between regions (Fig. 2). Multiple sequence haplotypes were found in all but one of the samples tested (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, 13/14 samples from 12 raccoons from the BR metropolitan area harboured exclusively TcI parasites and only 1 raccoon presented a co-infection with TcI and TcIV, although TcI predominated. On the other hand, in NOLA metropolitan area, 7/16 raccoons harboured only TcI parasites, 2/16 raccoons were infected with only TcII and 7/16 raccoons presented mixtures of TcI, TcII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI in different proportions (Fig. 2A), with up to 4 DTUs detected in a single raccoon. Despite TcIV being reported as the predominant DTU present in raccoons in the US (Hodo and Hamer, Reference Hodo and Hamer2017; Hodo et al., Reference Hodo, Bañuelos, Edwards, Wozniak and Hamer2020), it was only detected in 2 raccoons, 1 in each metropolitan area of Louisiana. When comparing T. cruzi DTU distribution in raccoons from the 2 regions, a striking difference was observed with racoons in NOLA infected with a large diversity of DTUs, with TcII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI accounting for 38.5% of haplotypes, while TcI largely predominated in BR, representing 99.8% of haplotypes (Fig. 2B). DTU TcIV was found at a low frequency, comprising only around 3% of all sequences identified. Overall, DTU TcI was the most abundant DTU identified, comprising nearly 80% of all sequences (Fig. 2B) and all but 3 raccoons harboured parasites from DTU TcI, often as a mixed infection with other DTUs in raccoons from the NOLA region.

Fig. 2. Frequency of T. cruzi parasite DTUs. Multiple genotypes were identified in all but 1 raccoon (A), with 10 samples demonstrating mixed infections with multiple DTUs. DTU TcI was the most abundant DTU in both metropolitan locations (NO, New Orleans and BR, Baton Rouge) as well as overall (B), followed by TcII and TcVI, TcIV and lastly TcV.

These data suggest that raccoons may not present major differences in susceptibility to T. cruzi DTUs. Rather, differences in T. cruzi DTU distribution in raccoons between BR and NOLA raccoons may reflect geographical/ecological differences. To test this, we performed a broader comparison of T. cruzi DTU distribution across southern Louisiana based on available data from multiple hosts and vectors. As expected, T. cruzi DTU distribution in Louisiana was found to vary significantly according to level III ecoregions (Fig. 3, χ 2 = 30.6, d.f. = 16, P = 0.015), suggesting that the observed differences in DTU proportion in raccoons between BR and NOLA likely reflect ecological differences in parasite diversity. Accordingly, Mississippi valley loess plains (including the BR area) and Western gulf coastal plains appear to support a lower diversity of T. cruzi DTUs compared to other ecoregions in Louisiana.

Fig. 3. Map of T. cruzi DTU distribution in Louisiana ecoregions. Cumulative proportions of DTUs from multiple mammal and vector samples across 21 parishes in Louisiana were mapped to level III ecoregions. Parishes from which T. cruzi DTU data were available from vectors/hosts are outlined. Distribution of DTUs varies significantly across level III ecosystems in Louisiana (χ 2 = 30.6, d.f. = 16). Size of each pie chart circle indicates the total number of sequences represented.

Finally, to investigate T. cruzi haplotype distribution across tissues within the same raccoon hosts, phylogenetic trees were constructed for sequences from 4 individual raccoons that had paired heart and colon samples in which T. cruzi was successfully genotyped. While some DTUs or haplotypes were found in both the heart and the colon of a single individual, others appeared to have tropism for a particular tissue (Fig. 4). In NOLA Raccoon 28 (Fig. 4A), identical or very closely related TcI and TcVI sequences were found in both the heart and the colon, but TcII sequences were only found in the colon. Similarly, in NOLA Raccoon 32 (Fig. 4C), some TcI sequences were found in both tissues, but a particular cluster of sequences was found only in the heart. Furthermore, TcVI was found only in the colon of this raccoon. While only TcI was identified in BR Raccoon 65 (Fig. 4B), some haplotypes were found in both the heart and the colon, but others were found in only 1 of the 2 tissues. Finally, in BR Raccoon 71, no TcI haplotype was found to be unique to the colon, but 1 cluster appeared to be unique to the heart (Fig. 4D).

Fig. 4. Trypanosoma cruzi haplotype distribution across tissues within individual raccoons. Two raccoons in each metropolitan area had high-quality T. cruzi sequences isolated from both hearts and colons. The 2 NOLA raccoons (A and C) each had infection with multiple DTUs, while the 2 BR raccoons (B and D) were infected with TcI. In each of the 2 NOLA raccoons (A and C), some DTUs were found only in the colon. Within DTU TcI in all 4 panels, some haplotypes were found in both tissues tested, while others were only detected in the heart or the colon.

Discussion

While raccoons have been long reported as an important reservoir due to their high and persistent parasitaemia as well as their proximity to humans, insights into the genetic diversity of T. cruzi circulating in this species further confirm their importance in transmission cycles in Louisiana and ultimately in relation to human health risk. The presence of highly similar or identical sequences to those found in other mammalian hosts and vectors in the region confirms the previously hypothesized role of raccoons in these shared local transmission networks. Though the circulation of DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI in Louisiana has previously been confirmed in several mammalian hosts, with DTUs TcII and TcV also having been identified in local T. sanguisuga vectors, this is the first report of these DTUs also infecting raccoons in the US.

While it has been previously suggested that raccoons may be more susceptible to TcIV infection, and/or were preferentially involved in parasite transmission cycles associated with this DTU (and to a lesser extent TcI), the observation of natural infection with multiple other DTUs using a deep sequencing approach rather refutes this hypothesis. Indeed, based on our data and previous reports, racoons appear to be equally susceptible to infections with a large diversity of T. cruzi strains covering TcI, TcII, TcIV, TcV and TcVI DTUs. Thus, while differences in host susceptibility to T. cruzi DTUs cannot be ruled out for other mammalian species, ecology is emerging as an important driver of DTU circulation and distribution. Distinct transmission networks may be the result of the interactions among unique host assemblages and vector feeding profiles in each habitat, together with the infection characteristics in each host species. The lack of observed TcII, TcV and TcVI DTUs in raccoons from the BR metropolitan area suggests independent local transmission cycles compared to the NOLA area, shaped by larger ecological differences and allowing for a greater diversity of parasite DTUs in NOLA. Accordingly, further targeted sampling of mammals using deep sequencing approaches is key to fully understand parasite transmission networks in the different habitats and ecoregions and ultimately threats to human health.

Considering the difference observed in proportions of DTUs as well as individual haplotypes within DTU, it becomes clear that deep sequencing methods are essential for assessing T. cruzi diversity in biological specimens. Though the mini-exon marker is polymorphic and cannot be used to determine whether multiple sequence types from the same DTU represent multiclonal infection or gene diversity within a monoclonal infection, nearly half the raccoons from NOLA and 1 raccoon from BR harboured parasites from multiple DTUs, providing evidence of multiclonal infection. It has been nearly 20 years since the first evidence that T. cruzi genetic exchange can occur within vertebrate hosts when infected with multiple lineages (Gaunt et al., Reference Gaunt, Yeo, Frame, Stothard, Carrasco, Taylor, Mena, Veazey, Miles, Acosta, de Arias and Miles2003), with recent literature emphasizing that this may occur via multiple mechanisms (Schwabl et al., Reference Schwabl, Imamura, Van den Broeck, Costales, Maiguashca-Sanchez, Miles, Andersson, Grijalva and Llewellyn2019). Infection with multiple genotypes in the same host, therefore, provides opportunity for the generation of greater parasite diversity through recombination events. Thus, while Sanger sequencing and other less sensitive genotyping methods continue to be used in T. cruzi genotyping studies, deep sequencing approaches may be truly necessary to elucidate all lineages present in an infection and more fully understand T. cruzi transmission cycles, infection dynamics and fundamentally risk to humans across the Southern US and elsewhere.

As exact associations between specific genotypes and clinical disease outcomes continue to be investigated and as the full extent of intra-lineage diversity is further elucidated, it is important to consider associations at both the DTU level and at the specific haplotype level. Indeed, while some previous studies report DTU associations with specific outcomes, others fail to find such associations. Tissue tropism of various genotype groupings is, then, potentially important to consider as a contributing factor to clinical outcomes. Though a very limited dataset, it is interesting that TcII was only found to be present in the colon of NOLA Raccoon 28 and not in the heart, as TcII has been associated with digestive complications of Chagas disease (Nielebock et al., Reference Nielebock, Moreira, Xavier, Miranda, Lima, Pereira, Hasslocher-Moreno, Britto, Sangenis and Saraiva2020). Looking at TcI, however, while there is no apparent DTU-level tropism, there does seem to be specific haplotype-level differences in tropism, which may, in part explain some of the clinical variation seen in infections with this DTU. Differences in clinical outcomes between genotypes with specific tissue tropisms vs those that seem to infect the host more broadly are certainly interesting to explore, but a greater depth of information remains crucial in teasing out these nuanced details, especially when considering multiclonality of infection.

Fundamentally, One Health approaches to anthropozoonoses are necessary to best estimate and mitigate risk to human health; the results presented herein support the need for widespread monitoring of T. cruzi in wildlife across the US. DTU TcVI has been described as presenting a risk for both the cardiac and the gastrointestinal forms of the disease and yet was thought to be essentially absent in sylvatic cycles from South America (Bizai et al., Reference Bizai, Romina, Antonela, Olivera, Arias, Josefina, Silvia, Walter, Diana and Cristina2020; Monje-Rumi et al., Reference Monje-Rumi, Floridia-Yapur, Zago, Ragone, Pérez Brandán, Nuñez, Barrientos, Tomasini and Diosque2020; Nielebock et al., Reference Nielebock, Moreira, Xavier, Miranda, Lima, Pereira, Hasslocher-Moreno, Britto, Sangenis and Saraiva2020). If this DTU is found to be circulating more in wildlife than previously expected, there may be an increased risk to local humans for clinical forms of Chagas disease. Similarly, the presence of TcII haplotypes with a seeming tropism for the colon in the NOLA area transmission cycle suggests that these genotypes could cause gastrointestinal complications in an autochthonous human infection. Furthermore, TcIa, 1 of the 2 subtypes of TcI identified in these raccoons, has been associated with severe heart disease and reactivation of disease after transplant in Argentina (Burgos et al., Reference Burgos, Diez, Vigliano, Bisio, Risso, Duffy, Cura, Brusses, Favaloro, Leguizamon, Lucero, Laguens, Levin, Favaloro and Schijman2010; Herrera et al., Reference Herrera, Truyens, Dumonteil, Alger, Sosa-Estani, Cafferata, Gibbons, Ciganda, Matute, Zuniga, Carlier and Buekens2019b). These findings are particularly concerning when paired with repeated evidence of triatomine vectors feeding on both raccoons and humans.

In conclusion, raccoons in the US are confirmed as an important reservoir species for T. cruzi and harbour a greater diversity of parasite than previously identified. Geographic differences in parasite diversity infecting these raccoons argue against host-specific differences in susceptibility to T. cruzi DTUs, and rather suggest that ecological niches play a significant role in shaping the distribution of parasite diversity, highlighting the existence of punctuated, local transmission cycles. Given both this finding and the evidence that some haplotypes may have tissue-specific tropisms, which may contribute to differences in infection outcomes, widespread T. cruzi surveillance in reservoir species with next-generation sequencing approaches remains an important component of assessing risk to human health in the US.

Data availability

Data are available on NCBI under accession numbers OP311929–OP312049.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Louisiana Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (LASPCA) for their support with this study and David Perault for animal capture in East Baton Rouge Parish.

Author's contributions

C. H. and E. D. conceived the study and designed the study protocol and analysis and interpretation of the data. E. C., A. N. A. and S. C. S.-B. performed necropsies and provided heart and colon samples. A. M. carried out the molecular analysis and interpretation of the data. A. M., C. H. and E. D. wrote the article. All authors drafted the manuscript and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

This work was funded in part by the Tulane ByWater Institute-Faculty Fellowships in Interdisciplinary Collaboration and the Louisiana Board of Regents through the Board of Regents Support Fund [# LESASF (2018-21)-RD-A-19].

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

All animal procedures were approved by the Louisiana State University Health Science Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No. T3455) and the Tulane Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol No. 4423). This study adhered to all Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Immobilization and Euthanasia guidelines.

References

Barnabé, C, Yaeger, R, Pung, O and Tibayrenc, M (2001) Trypanosoma cruzi: a considerable phylogenetic divergence indicates that the agent of Chagas disease is indigenous to the native fauna of the United States. Experimental Parasitology 99, 7379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bern, C, Kjos, S, Yabsley, MJ and Montgomery, SP (2011) Trypanosoma cruzi and Chagas’ disease in the United States. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 24, 655681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bi, L, Groce, C and Davis, C (2010) Molecular analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates obtained from raccoons in Warren and Barren counties of Kentucky. BMC Bioinformatics 11, P3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizai, ML, Romina, P, Antonela, S, Olivera, LV, Arias, EE, Josefina, DC, Silvia, M, Walter, S, Diana, F and Cristina, D (2020) Geographic distribution of Trypanosoma cruzi genotypes detected in chronic infected people from Argentina. Association with climatic variables and clinical manifestations of Chagas disease. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 78, 104128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgos, JM, Diez, M, Vigliano, C, Bisio, M, Risso, M, Duffy, T, Cura, C, Brusses, B, Favaloro, L, Leguizamon, MS, Lucero, RH, Laguens, R, Levin, MJ, Favaloro, R and Schijman, AG (2010) Molecular identification of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units in end-stage chronic Chagas heart disease and reactivation after heart transplantation. Clinical Infectious Diseases 51, 485495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cura, CI, Mejia-Jaramillo, AM, Duffy, T, Burgos, JM, Rodriguero, M, Cardinal, MV, Kjos, S, Gurgel-Goncalves, R, Blanchet, D, De Pablos, LM, Tomasini, N, da Silva, A, Russomando, G, Cuba, CA, Aznar, C, Abate, T, Levin, MJ, Osuna, A, Gurtler, RE, Diosque, P, Solari, A, Triana-Chavez, O and Schijman, AG (2010) Trypanosoma cruzi I genotypes in different geographical regions and transmission cycles based on a microsatellite motif of the intergenic spacer of spliced-leader genes. International Journal for Parasitology 40, 15991607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curtis-Robles, R, Lewis, BC and Hamer, SA (2016) High Trypanosoma cruzi infection prevalence associated with minimal cardiac pathology among wild carnivores in central Texas. International Journal for Parasitology. Parasites and Wildlife 5, 117123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daigle, JJ, Griffith, GE, Omernik, JM, Faulkner, PL, McCulloh, RP, Handley, LR, Smith, LM and Chapman, SS (2006) Ecoregions of Louisiana. pp. (Color Poster with Map, Descriptive Text, Summary Tables, and Photographs). Reston, Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Dorn, PL, Perniciaro, L, Yabsley, MJ, Roellig, DM, Balsamo, G, Diaz, J and Wesson, D (2007) Autochthonous transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi, Louisiana. Emerging Infectious Diseases 13, 605607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumonteil, E, Elmayan, A, Majeau, A, Tu, W, Duhon, B, Marx, P, Wolfson, W, Balsamo, G and Herrera, C (2020a) Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi parasites infecting dogs in southern Louisiana sheds light on parasite transmission cycles and serological diagnostic performance. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14, e0008932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumonteil, E, Pronovost, H, Bierman, EF, Sanford, A, Majeau, A, Moore, R and Herrera, C (2020b) Interactions among Triatoma sanguisuga blood feeding sources, gut microbiota and Trypanosoma cruzi diversity in southern Louisiana. Molecular Ecology 29, 37473761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumonteil, E, Desale, H, Tu, W, Duhon, B, Wolfson, W, Balsamo, G and Herrera, C (2021) Shelter cats host infections with multiple Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing units in southern Louisiana. Veterinary Research 52, 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmayan, A, Tu, W, Duhon, B, Marx, P, Wolfson, W, Balsamo, G, Herrera, C and Dumonteil, E (2019) High prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in shelter dogs from southern Louisiana, USA. Parasites & Vectors 12, 322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falla, A, Herrera, C, Fajardo, A, Montilla, M, Vallejo, GA and Guhl, F (2009) Haplotype identification within Trypanosoma cruzi I in Colombian isolates from several reservoirs, vectors and humans. Acta Tropica 110, 1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flores-López, CA, Mitchell, EA, Reisenman, CE, Sarkar, S, Williamson, PC and Machado, CA (2022) Phylogenetic diversity of two common Trypanosoma cruzi lineages in the Southwestern United States. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 99, 105251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, MN, Burroughs, H, Gorchakov, R, Gunter, SM, Dumonteil, E, Murray, KO and Herrera, CP (2017) Molecular identification and genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in autochthonous Chagas disease patients from Texas, USA. Infection Genetics and Evolution 49, 151156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaunt, MW, Yeo, M, Frame, IA, Stothard, JR, Carrasco, HJ, Taylor, MC, Mena, SS, Veazey, P, Miles, GAJ, Acosta, N, de Arias, AR and Miles, MA (2003) Mechanism of genetic exchange in American trypanosomes. Nature 421, 936939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorchakov, R, Trosclair, LP, Wozniak, EJ, Feria, PT, Garcia, MN, Gunter, SM and Murray, KO (2016) Trypanosoma cruzi infection prevalence and bloodmeal analysis in triatomine vectors of Chagas disease from rural peridomestic locations in Texas, 2013–2014. Journal of Medical Entomology 53, 911918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, C, Bargues, MD, Fajardo, A, Montilla, M, Triana, O, Vallejo, GA and Guhl, F (2007) Identifying four Trypanosoma cruzi I isolate haplotypes from different geographic regions in Colombia. Infection Genetics and Evolution 7, 535539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, C, Majeau, A, Didier, P, Falkenstein, KP and Dumonteil, E (2019a) Trypanosoma cruzi diversity in naturally infected nonhuman primates in Louisiana assessed by deep sequencing of the mini-exon gene. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 113, 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, C, Truyens, C, Dumonteil, E, Alger, J, Sosa-Estani, S, Cafferata, ML, Gibbons, L, Ciganda, A, Matute, ML, Zuniga, C, Carlier, Y and Buekens, P (2019b) Phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi from pregnant women and newborns from Argentina, Honduras, and Mexico suggests an association of parasite haplotypes with congenital transmission of the parasite. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 21, 10951105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodo, CL and Hamer, SA (2017) Toward an ecological framework for assessing reservoirs of vector-borne pathogens: wildlife reservoirs of Trypanosoma cruzi across the southern United States. ILAR Journal 58, 379392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodo, CL, Bañuelos, RM, Edwards, EE, Wozniak, EJ and Hamer, SA (2020) Pathology and discrete typing unit associations of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in coyotes (Canis latrans) and raccoons (Procyon lotor) of Texas, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 56, 134144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izeta-Alberdi, A, Ibarra-Cerdena, CN, Moo-Llanes, DA and Ramsey, JM (2016) Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages. Parasites & Vectors 9, 631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kribs-Zaleta, C (2010) Estimating contact process saturation in sylvatic transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in the United States. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 4, e656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, MD, Llewellyn, MS, Yeo, M, Acosta, N, Gaunt, MW and Miles, MA (2011) Recent, independent and anthropogenic origins of Trypanosoma cruzi hybrids. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 5, e1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, L, Espinosa-Álvarez, O, Hamilton, PB, Neves, L, Takata, CSA, Campaner, M, Attias, M, de Souza, W, Camargo, EP and Teixeira, MMG (2013) Trypanosoma livingstonei: a new species from African bats supports the bat seeding hypothesis for the Trypanosoma cruzi clade. Parasites & Vectors 6, 221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llewellyn, MS, Miles, MA, Carrasco, HJ, Lewis, MD, Yeo, M, Vargas, J, Torrico, F, Diosque, P, Valente, V, Valente, SA and Gaunt, MW (2009) Genome-scale multilocus microsatellite typing of Trypanosoma cruzi discrete typing unit I reveals phylogeographic structure and specific genotypes linked to human infection. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majeau, A, Herrera, C and Dumonteil, E (2019) An improved approach to Trypanosoma cruzi molecular genotyping by next-generation sequencing of the mini-exon gene. In Gómez, KA and Buscaglia, CA (eds), T. cruzi Infection: Methods and Protocols. New York, NY: Springer New York, pp. 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majeau, A, Pronovost, H, Sanford, A, Cloherty, E, Anderson, AN, Balsamo, G, Gee, L, Straif-Bourgeois, SC and Herrera, C (2020) Raccoons as an important reservoir for Trypanosoma cruzi: a prevalence study from two metropolitan areas in Louisiana. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 20, 535540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcili, A, Lima, L, Cavazzana, M, Junqueira, AC, Veludo, HH, Maia Da Silva, F, Campaner, M, Paiva, F, Nunes, VL and Teixeira, MM (2009a) A new genotype of Trypanosoma cruzi associated with bats evidenced by phylogenetic analyses using SSU rDNA, cytochrome b and Histone H2B genes and genotyping based on ITS1 rDNA. Parasitology 136, 641655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcili, A, Lima, L, Valente, VC, Valente, SA, Batista, JS, Junqueira, ACV, Souza, AI, da Rosa, JA, Campaner, M, Lewis, MD, Llewellyn, MS, Miles, MA and Teixeira, MMG (2009b) Comparative phylogeography of Trypanosoma cruzi TCIIc: new hosts, association with terrestrial ecotopes, and spatial clustering. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 9, 12651274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Hernández, F, Oria-Martínez, B, Rendón-Franco, E, Villalobos, G and Muñoz-García, CI (2022) Trypanosoma cruzi, beyond the dogma of non-infection in birds. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 99, 105239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messenger, LA, Miles, MA and Bern, C (2015) Between a bug and a hard place: Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity and the clinical outcomes of Chagas disease. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy 13, 9951029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monje-Rumi, MM, Floridia-Yapur, N, Zago, MP, Ragone, PG, Pérez Brandán, CM, Nuñez, S, Barrientos, N, Tomasini, N and Diosque, P (2020). Potential association of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs TcV and TcVI with the digestive form of Chagas disease. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 84, 104329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielebock, MAP, Moreira, OC, Xavier, SCDC, Miranda, LDFC, Lima, ACBD, Pereira, TODJS, Hasslocher-Moreno, AM, Britto, C, Sangenis, LHC and Saraiva, RM (2020) Association between Trypanosoma cruzi DTU TcII and chronic Chagas disease clinical presentation and outcome in an urban cohort in Brazil. PLoS ONE 15, e0243008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pronovost, H, Peterson, AC, Chavez, BG, Blum, MJ, Dumonteil, E and Herrera, CP (2018) Deep sequencing reveals multiclonality and new discrete typing units of Trypanosoma cruzi in rodents from the southern United States. Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection 53, 622633. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2018.12.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roellig, DM, Brown, EL, Barnabé, C, Tibayrenc, M, Steurer, FJ and Yabsley, MJ (2008) Molecular typing of Trypanosoma cruzi isolates, United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14, 11231125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roellig, DM, Ellis, AE and Yabsley, MJ (2009a) Genetically different isolates of Trypanosoma cruzi elicit different infection dynamics in raccoons (Procyon lotor) and Virginia opossums (Didelphis virginiana). International Journal for Parasitology 39, 16031610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roellig, DM, Ellis, AE and Yabsley, MJ (2009b) Oral transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi with opposing evidence for the theory of carnivory. Journal of Parasitology 95, 360364, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roellig, DM, Savage, MY, Fujita, AW, Barnabe, C, Tibayrenc, M, Steurer, FJ and Yabsley, MJ (2013) Genetic variation and exchange in Trypanosoma cruzi isolates from the United States. PLoS ONE 8, e56198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwabl, P, Imamura, H, Van den Broeck, F, Costales, JA, Maiguashca-Sanchez, J, Miles, MA, Andersson, B, Grijalva, MJ and Llewellyn, MS (2019) Meiotic sex in Chagas disease parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. Nature Communications 10, 3972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souto, RP, Fernandes, O, Macedo, AM, Campbell, DA and Zingales, B (1996) DNA markers define two major phylogenetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 83, 141152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JM, Habrun, CA, Scully, CM, Sasaki, E, Bauer, RW, Jania, R, Baker, RE, Chapman, AM, Majeau, A, Pronovost, H, Dumonteil, E and Herrera, CP (2021) Locally transmitted Trypanosoma cruzi in a domestic llama (Lama glama) in a rural area of Greater New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 21, 762768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermark, C, Zieman, E, Boyles, E, Nielsen, CK, Davis, C and Jimenez, FA (2018) Trypanosoma cruzi strain TcIV infects raccoons from Illinois. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 113, 3037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villanueva-Lizama, L, Teh-Poot, C, Majeau, A, Herrera, C and Dumonteil, E (2019) Molecular genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi by next-generation sequencing of the mini-exon gene reveals infections with multiple parasite discrete typing units in Chagasic patients from Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Infectious Diseases 219, 19801988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waleckx, E, Suarez, J, Richards, B and Dorn, PL (2014) Triatoma sanguisuga blood meals and potential for Chagas disease, Louisiana, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases 20, 21412143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, BC, Bauman, PM, Diamond, LS and Herman, CM (1958) The isolation and identification of Trypanosoma cruzi from raccoons in Maryland. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 7, 603610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zingales, B, Andrade, SG, Briones, MR, Campbell, DA, Chiari, E, Fernandes, O, Guhl, F, Lages-Silva, E, Macedo, AM, Machado, CR, Miles, MA, Romanha, AJ, Sturm, NR, Tibayrenc, M, Schijman, AG and Second Satellite, M (2009) A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 104, 10511054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zingales, B, Miles, MA, Campbell, DA, Tibayrenc, M, Macedo, AM, Teixeira, MM, Schijman, AG, Llewellyn, MS, Lages-Silva, E, Machado, CR, Andrade, SG and Sturm, NR (2012) The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infection Genetics and Evolution 12, 240253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood trees of T. cruzi mini-exon sequences. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were constructed for raccoon sequences identified as TcI (A), TcII/TcV/TcVI (B) and TcIV (C), with reference sequences (asterisks) and sequences from other mammals and vectors included for each iteration (black). Most TcI sequences (A) from both NOLA (orange) and BR (red) were TcIa and closely related to other TcIa sequences from local vectors, though TcIb was also identified in NOLA. All 3 of the closely related DTUs TcII, TcV and TcVI were identified in raccoons in NOLA (B), with TcII sequences in green, TcV sequences in pink and TcVI sequences in blue. TcIV sequences (C) were identified in both NOLA (dark blue) and BR (light blue), with all sequences clustering closely with the North American TcIV sequence.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Frequency of T. cruzi parasite DTUs. Multiple genotypes were identified in all but 1 raccoon (A), with 10 samples demonstrating mixed infections with multiple DTUs. DTU TcI was the most abundant DTU in both metropolitan locations (NO, New Orleans and BR, Baton Rouge) as well as overall (B), followed by TcII and TcVI, TcIV and lastly TcV.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Map of T. cruzi DTU distribution in Louisiana ecoregions. Cumulative proportions of DTUs from multiple mammal and vector samples across 21 parishes in Louisiana were mapped to level III ecoregions. Parishes from which T. cruzi DTU data were available from vectors/hosts are outlined. Distribution of DTUs varies significantly across level III ecosystems in Louisiana (χ2 = 30.6, d.f. = 16). Size of each pie chart circle indicates the total number of sequences represented.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Trypanosoma cruzi haplotype distribution across tissues within individual raccoons. Two raccoons in each metropolitan area had high-quality T. cruzi sequences isolated from both hearts and colons. The 2 NOLA raccoons (A and C) each had infection with multiple DTUs, while the 2 BR raccoons (B and D) were infected with TcI. In each of the 2 NOLA raccoons (A and C), some DTUs were found only in the colon. Within DTU TcI in all 4 panels, some haplotypes were found in both tissues tested, while others were only detected in the heart or the colon.