Gubin, S. P., Koksharov, Y. A., Khomutov, G. B. and Yurkov, G. Y., Magnetic nanoparticles: Preparation, structure and properties. Russ. Chem. Rev., 74:6 (2005), 489–520.Google Scholar

Batlle, X. and Labarta, A., Finite-size effects in fine particles: Magnetic and transport properties. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 35:6 (2002), R15–42.Google Scholar

Skomski, R., Nanomagnetics. J. Phys. Cond. Matter., 15:20 (2003), R841–96.Google Scholar

Bansmann, J., Baker, S. H., Binns, C., et al., Magnetic and structural properties of isolated and assembled clusters. Surf. Sci. Rep., 56:6–7 (2005), 189–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, D. L. L. and Bland, J. A. C., Nanomagnetism: Ultrathin Films, Multilayers and Nanostructures, 1st edn (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006).Google Scholar

Mørup, S. and Hansen, M. F., Superparamagnetic particles. In Kronmüller, H. and Parkin, S. S., eds., Handbook of Magnetism and Advanced Magnetic Materials, Vol. 4 of Novel Materials. (Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007), pp. 2159–76.Google Scholar

Aktas, B. and F. Mikailov, eds., Advances in Nanoscale Magnetism, 1st edn (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar

Guimaraes, A. P., Principles of Nanomagnetism, 1st edn (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009).Google Scholar

Shinjo, T., ed., Nanomagnetics and Spintronics, 1st edn (Oxford: Elsevier, 2009).Google Scholar

Bozorth, R., Ferromagnetism, 3rd edn (New York, NY: Wiley-IEEE Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Chikazumi, S., Physics of Ferromagnetism, 2nd edn, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Smart, J. S., Effective Field Theories of Magnetism, (Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Co., 1966).Google Scholar

Odom, B., Hanneke, D., d’Urso, B. and Gabrielse, G., New measurement of the electron magnetic moment using a one-electron quantum cyclotron. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:3 (2006), 030801.Google Scholar

Figgis, B. N. and Lewis, J., The magnetochemistry of complex compounds. In Lewis, J. and Wilkins, R. G., eds., Modern Coordination Chemistry (New York, NY: Wiley, 1960).Google Scholar

Goodenough, J. B., Magnetism and the Chemical Bond, 1st edn (New York, NY: J. Wiley & Sons, 1963).Google Scholar

Kittel, C., Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th edn (New York, NY: Wiley, 2005).Google Scholar

Martin, D. H., Magnetism in Solids, 1st edn (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1967).Google Scholar

Eriksson, O., Johansson, B., Albers, R. C., Boring, A. M., and Brooks, M. S. S., Orbital magnetism in Fe, Co, and Ni. Phys. Rev. B., 42:4 (1990), 2707–10.Google Scholar

Haynes, W. M., ed., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 92nd edn (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Hesjedal, T., Kretzer, U. and Ney, A., Magnetic susceptibility of n-type GaAs. Semicond. Sci. Technol., 27:5 (2012), 055018.Google Scholar

Goryunova, N. A., Slozhnye Almazopodobnye Poluprovodniki (Complex Diamond-like Semiconductors), 1st edn (Moscow: Sovietskoye Radio (Soviet Radio), 1968).Google Scholar

Crangle, J., Magnetic Properties of Solids, 1st edn (London: Edward Arnold, 1977).Google Scholar

Darby, M. I., Tables of the Brillouin function and of the related function for the spontaneous magnetization. Br. J. Appl. Phys., 18:10 (1967), 1415–7.Google Scholar

Callen, E. R. and Callen, H. B., Static magnetoelastic coupling in cubic crystals. Phys. Rev., 129:2 (1963), 578–93.Google Scholar

Chudnovsky, E. M. and Gunther, L., Quantum tunneling of magnetization in small ferromagnetic particles. Phys. Rev. Lett., 60:8 (1988), 661–4.Google Scholar

Meiklejohn, W. H. and Bean, C. P., New magnetic anisotropy. Phys. Rev., 102:5 (1956), 1413–4.Google Scholar

Carey, R. and Isaac, E. D., Magnetic Domains and Techniques for their Observation (New York, NY: Academic Press, 1966).Google Scholar

Craik, D. J. and Tebble, R. S., Magnetic domains. Rep. Prog. Phys., 24 (1961), 116–66.Google Scholar

De Hosson, J. T. M., Chechenin, N. G. and Vystavel, T., Nano-structured magnetic films investigated with Lorentz transmission electron microscopy and electron holography. Nato Science Series II, 128 (2003), 463–80.Google Scholar

Allenspach, R., Sallemik, H., Bischof, A. and Weibel, E., Tunneling experiments involving magnetic tip and magnetic sample. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter, 67 (1987), 125–8.Google Scholar

Schippan, F., Behme, G., Däweritz, L., et al., Magnetic structure of epitaxially grown MnAs on GaAs(001). J. Appl. Phys. 88:5 (2000), 2766–70.Google Scholar

Baruchel, J., Schlenker, M., Kurosawa, K. and Saito, S., Antiferromagnetic S-domains in NiO. Phil. Mag. B, 43:5 (1981), 853–60.Google Scholar

Tanner, B. K., Antiferromagnetic domains. Contemp. Phys., 20:2 (1979), 187–210.Google Scholar

Stöhr, J., Padmore, H. A., Anders, S., Stammler, T. and Scheinfein, M. R., Principles of X-ray magnetic dichroism spectromicroscopy. Surf. Rev. and Lett., 5:6 (1998), 1297–308.Google Scholar

Brown, P. J., Spherical neutron polarimetry. In Chatterji, T., ed., Neutron Scattering from Magnetic Materials (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005).Google Scholar

McHenry, M. E. and Laughlin, D. E., Nano-scale materials development for future magnetic applications. Acta mater., 48:1 (2000), 223–38.Google Scholar

Néel, L., Some theoretical aspects of rock-magnetism. Adv Phys., 4:14 (1955), 191–243.Google Scholar

Coey, J. M. D., Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Kneller, E. F. and Luborsky, F. E., Particle size dependence of coercivity and remanence of single-domain particles. J. Appl. Phys., 34:3 (1963), 656–8.Google Scholar

McIntyre, D. A., The size dependence of the coercivity of small particles: a statistical approach. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 3:10 (1970), 1430–3.Google Scholar

Herzer, G., Nanocrystalline soft magnetic materials. Phys. Scripta, T49 (1993), 307–14.Google Scholar

Rowlands, G., The variation of coercivity with particle size. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 9:8 (1976), 1267–9.Google Scholar

Stoner, E. C. and Wohlfarth, E. P., Interpretation of high coercivity in ferromagnetic materials. Nature, 160 (1947), 650–1.Google Scholar

Néel, L., Théorie du traînage magnétique des ferromagnétiques en grains fins avec applications aux terres cuites. Ann. Geophys. C.N.R.S., 5 (1949), 99–136.Google Scholar

Brown, W. F. Jr., Thermal fluctuations of a single-domain particle. Phys. Rev., 130:5 (1963), 1677–86.Google Scholar

Wohlfarth, E. P., The coefficient of magnetic viscosity. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys., 14:8 (1984), L155–9.Google Scholar

Wernsdorfer, W., Hasselbach, K., Benoit, A., et al., Measurement of the dynamics of the magnetization reversal in individual single-domain Co particles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 151:1–2 (1995), 38–44.Google Scholar

Wernsdorfer, W., Doudin, B., Mailly, D., et al., Nucleation of magnetization reversal in individual nanosized nickel wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77:9 (1996), 1873–6.Google Scholar

Donahue, M. J. and Porter, D. G., Object Oriented MicroMagnetic Framework (OOMMF) Users’ Guide. NIST Interagency Report 6376. National Institute of Standards and Technology (1999).Google Scholar

Vansteenkiste, A., Leliaert, J., Dvornik, M., et al., The design and verification of MuMax3. AIP Adv., 4:10 (2014), 107133.Google Scholar

McHenry, M. E., Majetich, S. A., Artman, J. O., Degraef, M. and Staley, S. W., Superparamagnetism in carbon-coated Co particles produced by the Kratschmer carbon arc process. Phys. Rev. B, 49:16 (1994), 11358.Google Scholar

Ionescu, A., Darton, N. J., Vyas, K. and Llandro, J., Detection of endogenous magnetic nanoparticles with a tunnelling magneto-resistance sensor. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 368:1927 (2010), 4371–87.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. F. and Mørup, S., Models for the dynamics of interacting magnetic nanoparticles. J. Mag. Magn. Mater., 184:3 (1998), L262–74.Google Scholar

Billas, I. M. L., Châtelain, A. and de Heer, W. A., Magnetism from the atom to the bulk in iron, cobalt, and nickel clusters. Science, 265:5179 (1994), 1682–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knickelbein, M. B., Adsorbate-induced enhancement of the magnetic moments of iron clusters. Chem. Phys. Lett., 353:3–4 (2002), 221–5.Google Scholar

Stoner, E. C. and Wohlfarth, E. P., A mechanism of magnetic hysteresis in heterogeneous alloys. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 240:826 (1948), 599–642.Google Scholar

Tannous, C. and Gieraltowski, J., The Stoner–Wohlfarth model of ferromagnetism. Eur. J. Phys., 29:3 (2008), 475–87.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. F. and Mørup, S., Estimation of blocking temperatures from ZFC/FC curves. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 203:1–3 (1999), 214–6.Google Scholar

Arrott, A., Criterion for ferromagnetism from observations of magnetic isotherms. Phys. Rev., 108:6 (1957), 1394–6.Google Scholar

Lifshitz, E. M. and Pitaevskii, L. P., Statistical Physics Part 2, Vol. 9 of Course of Theoretical Physics, 3rd edn (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991).Google Scholar

Noakes, J. E. and Arrott, A., Surface of magnetization, field, and temperature for nickel near its Curie temperature, J. Appl. Phys., 38:3 (1967), 973–4; Magnetization of nickel near its critical temperature, J. Appl. Phys., 39:2 (1968) 1235–6.Google Scholar

Widom, B., Degree of the critical isotherm. J. Chem. Phys., 41:6 (1964), 1633–4.Google Scholar

van Hove, L., Temperature variation of the magnetic inelastic scattering of slow neutrons, Phys. Rev., 93:2 (1954), 268–9; Correlations in space and time and Born approximation scattering in systems of interacting particles, Phys. Rev., 95:1 (1954), 249–62; Time-dependent correlations between spins and neutron scattering in ferromagnetic crystals, Phys. Rev., 95:6 (1954), 1374–84.Google Scholar

Lovesey, S. W., Theory of Neutron Scattering from Condensed Matter, Vol. 2, 1st edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Kadanoff, L. P., Scaling laws for Ising models near T_c. Physics, 2:6 (1966), 263–72.Google Scholar

Fisher, M. E., The theory of equilibrium critical phenomena. Rep. Prog. Phys., 30:Part II (1967), 615–730. Corrigendum: M.E. Fisher, Rep. Prog. Phys., 31:1 (1968), 418–20.Google Scholar

Pelissetto, A. and Vicari, E., Critical phenomena and renormalization-group theory. Phys. Rep., 368:6 (2002), 549–727.Google Scholar

Campostrini, M., Hasenbusch, M., Pelissetto, A. and Vicari, E., Theoretical estimates of the critical exponents of the superfluid transition in ⁴He by lattice methods. Phys. Rev. B, 74:14 (2006), 144506.Google Scholar

Chantrell, R. W. and Wohlfarth, E. P., Dynamic and static properties of interacting fine ferromagnetic particles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 40:1 (1983), 1–11.Google Scholar

Bødker, F., Mørup, S., Pedersen, M. S., et al., Superparamagnetic relaxation in α-Fe particles. J. Mag. Mag. Mat., 177–181:Part 2 (1998), 925–7.Google Scholar

Mørup, S. and Topsøe, H., Mössbauer studies of thermal excitations in magnetically ordered microcrystals. Appl. Phys., 11:1 (1976), 63–6.Google Scholar

Mørup, S., Hansen, M. F. and Frandsen, C., Magnetic interactions between nanoparticles. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 1 (2010), 182–90.Google Scholar

Tronc, E., Nanoparticles. Il Nuovo Cimento D, 18:2–3 (1996), 163–80.Google Scholar

Mørup, S., Christensen, P. H. and Clausen, B.S., Magnetic hyperfine splitting in superparamagnetic particles in external magnetic fields. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 68:2 (1987), 160–70.Google Scholar

Squires, G. L., Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering, 1st edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Mørup, S. and Hansen, B. R., Uniform magnetic excitations in nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B, 72:2 (2005), 024418.Google Scholar

Hennion, M., Bellouard, C., Mirebeau, I., Dormann, J. L. and Nogues, M., Dual spin dynamics of small Fe particles. Europhys. Lett., 25:1 (1994), 43–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kubo, R., Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems. J. Phys. Soc. Japan., 12:6 (1957), 570–86.Google Scholar

van der Laan, G. and Figueroa, A. I., X-ray magnetic circular dichroism – A versatile tool to study magnetism. Coord. Chem. Rev., 277–278 (2014), 95–129.Google Scholar

Funk, T., Deb, A., George, S. J., Wang, H. and Cramer, S. P., X-ray magnetic circular dichroism – A high energy probe of magnetic properties. Coord. Chem. Rev., 249:1–2 (2005), 3–30.Google Scholar

Thole, B. T., Carra, P., Sette, F. and van der Laan, G., X-ray circular dichroism as a probe of orbital magnetization. Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:12 (1992), 1943–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carra, P., Thole, B. T., Altarelli, M. and Wang, X., X-ray circular dichroism and local magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70 (1993), 694–7.Google Scholar

Imada, S., Suga, S., Kuch, W. and Kirchner, J., Magnetic microspectroscopy by a combination of XMCD and PEEM. Surf. Rev. Lett., 9:2 (2002), 877–81.Google Scholar

Guinier, A., X-ray Diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies, 1st edn (San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman & Co., 1963).Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Carvajal, J., Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B, 192:1–2 (1993), 55–69.Google Scholar

Scherrer, P., Bestimmung der Größe und der inneren Struktur von Kolloidteilchen mittels Röntgenstrahlen. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 2 (1918), 98–100.Google Scholar

Stokes, A. R. and Wilson, A. J. C., The diffraction of X-rays by distorted crystal aggregates. I. Proc. Phys. Soc., 56:3 (1944), 174–81.Google Scholar

Mote, V. D., Purushotham, Y. and Dole, B. N., Williamson–Hall analysis in estimation of lattice strain in nanometer-sized ZnO particles. J. Theor. Appl. Phys., 6 :6 (2012).Google Scholar

Cooper, J. F. K., Ionescu, A., Langford, R. M., et al., Core/shell magnetism in NiO nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys., 114:8 (2013), 083906.Google Scholar