Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:36:39.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sperm whales in the Neolithic Mediterranean: a tooth from the sanctuary of Monte d'Accoddi (Sardinia, Italy)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2021

Maria Grazia Melis*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Humanities and Education, University of Sassari, Italy
Marco Zedda
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Italy
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ mgmelis@uniss.it
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The exceptional find of the tooth of a sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) at Monte d'Accoddi adds to the documentation on the possible presence, and exploitation by humans, of cetaceans in the prehistoric Mediterranean. The dating (3638–3378 BC) appears to make it the oldest cetacean find in Sardinia.

Type
Project Gallery
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.

Introduction

The use of cetaceans as a food source is sporadically documented in Europe since the Middle Palaeolithic (Benito et al. Reference Benito, Sanchis, Beneyto, Benito and Sanchis2019), while the exploitation of bones and teeth is noted from the Upper Palaeolithic (Pétillon Reference Pétillon, Smolderen, Gillard and Cattelain2018). The use of ivory derived from large marine and land mammals is confirmed by fairly common finds of artefacts (Álvarez Fernández Reference Álvarez Fernández2002). Palaeolithic and Mesolithic depictions of cetaceans, among them the sperm whale, underline the interest that human groups have shown in them (Serangeli I. Dalmau Reference Serangeli I. Dalmau2001); this is still further emphasised by finds far from coastal areas, which are evidence of the circulation of raw materials over medium and long distances (Pétillon Reference Pétillon, Smolderen, Gillard and Cattelain2018). The importance of cetaceans, and of the sperm whale in particular, is highlighted during the Neolithic through the presence of symbolic figures on fifth-millennium BC megalithic monuments along the European Atlantic coast, as well as more rarely in inland France (Huet Reference Huet, Guilaine and Garcia2018). Despite its geographic distance, it is also interesting to note a rock engraving in South Korea (6000–1000 BC), in which cetaceans, including the sperm whale, represent 19.9 per cent of the total figures present (Schuhmacher et al. Reference Schuhmacher2013).

The presence of cetacean remains in the Mediterranean, which are concentrated chiefly around the Spanish coast, is lower compared with the Atlantic. During the transition from the Mesolithic to the Neolithic cetaceans are attested in the Uzzo Cave (Sicily), where episodes of beaching relating to rapid climate change around 8200 years BP are evident (Mannino et al. Reference Mannino2015). A depiction of a dolphin from the nearby Levanzo Cave can be dated to the Final Neolithic/Early Eneolithic (Tusa Reference Tusa, Anati, Mensi and Marretta2004). Remains of vertebrae have been found in the Aegean at Saliagos (4200–3700 BC) and Phaistos (4500–3300 BC) (Benito et al. Reference Benito, Sanchis, Beneyto, Benito and Sanchis2019). Finds of cetacean remains become more common during the Eneolithic pre-Bell Beaker and Bell Beaker periods along the European Atlantic coast (Benito et al. Reference Benito, Sanchis, Beneyto, Benito and Sanchis2019), and less frequently in the Western Mediterranean. Added to these is a sperm whale tooth, found on the Atlantic coast of Morocco in a Neolithic context (3495–2885 BC) (Charon et al. Reference Charon, Ortlieb and Petit-Maire1973). In the French Midi, dolphin remains can be found in the Final Neolithic (c. 3300–2500 BC) (Cauliez et al. Reference Cauliez, Fouéré, Chevillot, Courtaud, Ferullo and Leroyer2007). Along with bone remains, there is also a widespread presence of ivory objects made from large marine and land mammals.

During the third millennium BC finds of sophisticated ivory objects from African and Asian elephants become more frequent in funerary contexts (Castrillo Jimenez Reference Castrillo Jimenez2020), thereby providing evidence for the exchange of prestige goods between the Eastern and Western Mediterranean. In Sardinia the earliest ivory objects are related to the Bell Beaker phenomenon and come from both African and Asian elephants (Morillo et al. Reference Morillo, Pau and Guilaine2018). From the Bronze Age onwards the production of ivory objects intensified, using mostly elephant tusks. In Sardinia cetacean bone remains were found in a Nuragic tomb (Speller et al. Reference Speller2016). Evidence for the use of ivory from sperm whale teeth is much rarer, although known in some Iberian Chalcolithic sites (Schuhmacher et al. Reference Schuhmacher2013; Liesau et al. Reference Liesau, Ríos and Blasco2020).

The shrine of Monte d'Accoddi: archaeological and radiocarbon data

The shrine at Monte d'Accoddi is part of a settlement inhabited from the second half of the fifth millennium BC. During the first half of the fourth millennium BC a single terrace and ramp structure was built, which was rebuilt and enlarged (Figure 1) during the second half of the millennium. The settlement was used continuously for religious purposes until the end of the third millennium BC. There is also a great deal of evidence concerning general subsistence activities and the processing of raw materials (Melis Reference Melis2011).

Figure 1. Monte d'Accoddi: location map and aerial photograph of the site (photographs courtesy of Oben srl).

During excavations in 1959, a sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) tooth was found in the upper levels of trench XII-NE (Figures 23); it bore incisions that could be interpreted as the start of some kind of process of working. It seems likely that at the time it was found—during the last moments of the final excavation—it went unrecognised, as there is no mention of it in the site diary. It was later sent, together with the other faunal finds, to the Museo di Scienze Naturali in Bergamo to be studied; however, this study was never undertaken. In 2014 all the material from the excavation was returned to Sassari, and the tooth was finally confirmed as the only sperm-whale find.

Figure 2. Plan of the site and location of the find (red star) (after Melis Reference Melis2011).

Figure 3. Sperm whale tooth (photographs by M. Zedda).

Radiocarbon-dating of the tooth (LTL 20016A; 4755±40 BP, 3638–3436 BC, at 2σ) (Figure 4) places it between the end of the Neolithic and the start of the Eneolithic, in a period shortly before the rebuilding of the monument. The most likely explanation for the presence of a sperm whale tooth at Monte d'Accoddi is that it was found on the nearby beach, 3.4km away. Nevertheless, it cannot be discounted that the tooth came to Sardinia as part of obsidian exchange networks with the French and Catalan coasts.

Figure 4. Radiocarbon-dating of the sperm whale tooth sample (date calibrated in OxCal v4.4.3 using the IntCal20 atmospheric curve (Reimer et al. Reference Reimer2020; Bronk Ramsey Reference Bronk Ramsey2021)).

The find is significant for several reasons. It was most likely destined to be used for making artefacts, confirming that domestic activities accompanied the ritual life practised at the shrine since the Final Neolithic. Despite never being completed and used as an artefact, the tooth is the earliest evidence for the presence of ivory in Sardinia; no other ivory artefacts have been found at Monte d'Accoddi. Finally, the dating of the tooth to the Late Neolithic to Early Eneolithic places it earlier than the period of the broadest use of ivory in Europe and the Mediterranean, which was during the Bell Beaker phase in the second half of the third millennium BC (Schuhmacher Reference Schuhmacher, Bartelheim, Ramírez and Kunst2017).

Funding statement

The research was supported by the University of Sassari.

References

Álvarez Fernández, E. 2002. The use of ivory during the Upper Palaeolithic at the northern edge of the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Iberian Archaeology 4: 720.Google Scholar
Benito, J.L.P., Sanchis, A. & Beneyto, J.P.. 2019. Ballenas y delfines en la prehistoria peninsular: los restos de cetáceo de La Vital (Gandia), in Benito, J.L.P. & Sanchis, A. (ed.) Recursos marins en el passat: 165–92. Valencia: Museu de Prehistòria de València.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2021. Available at: https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk/oxcal.html (accessed 18 May 2021).Google Scholar
Castrillo Jimenez, C. 2020. Review of the geographical distribution of ivory and its use value in the Iberian Peninsula from the beginning of third millennium to Early Bronze Age. Arqueología y Territorio 17: 5162.Google Scholar
Cauliez, J. et al. 2007. Paysage et implantations du Néolithique final à l’âge du Bronze ancien au Collet-Redon (Martigues-Bouches-du-Rhône), in Fouéré, P., Chevillot, C., Courtaud, P., Ferullo, O. & Leroyer, C. (ed.) Paysages et peuplements: aspects culturels et chronologiques en France méridionale. Actualité de la recherche (Préhistoire du Sud-Ouest 11): 125–39. Périgueux: Association pour le développement de la recherche archéologique et historique en Périgord.Google Scholar
Charon, M., Ortlieb, L. & Petit-Maire, N.. 1973. Occupation humaine holocène de la région du Cap Juby (sud-ouest Marocain). Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris XII (Série 10–14): 379412. https://doi.org/10.3406/bmsap.1973.2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huet, T. 2018. Une revue de l'iconographie du début du Néolithique à la fin de l'Age du Bronze (c. 5700–750 avant notre ère) en France, in Guilaine, J. & Garcia, D. (ed.) La Protohistoire de la France: 221–49. Paris: Hermann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liesau, C., Ríos, P. & Blasco, C.. 2020. Les campaniformes dans le centre de la péninsule Ibérique: conserver la mémoire des ancêtres. Préhistoires Méditerranéennes 8. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/pm/2386?lang=en (accessed 13 July 2020).Google Scholar
Mannino, M.A. et al. 2015. Climate-driven environmental changes around 8200 years ago favoured increases in cetacean strandings and Mediterranean hunter-gatherers exploited them. Scientific Reports 5: 16288. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, M.G. 2011. Monte d'Accoddi and the end of the Neolithic in Sardinia (Italy). Documenta Praehistorica 38: 207–19. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.38.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morillo, L.J.M., Pau, C. & Guilaine, J.. 2018. The proboscidean ivory adornments from the hypogeum of Padru Jossu (Sanluri, Sardinia, Italy) and the Mediterranean Bell Beaker. Zephyrus: Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología 82: 3563. https://doi.org/10.14201/zephyrus2018823563Google Scholar
Pétillon, J.M. 2018. Échos de l'océan: phoques et baleines en Europe au Paléolithique récent, in Smolderen, A., Gillard, M. & Cattelain, P. (ed.) Disparus? Les mammifères au temps de Cro-Magnon en Europe: 335–54. Treignes: Cedarc/Musée du Malgré-Tout.Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J. et al. 2020. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62: 725–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuhmacher, T.X. 2017. Ivory exchange networks in the Chalcolithic of the Western Mediterranean, in Bartelheim, M., Ramírez, P.B. & Kunst, M. (ed.) Key resources and sociocultural developments in the Iberian Chalcolithic: 291312. Tübingen: Library Publishing.Google Scholar
Schuhmacher, T.X. et al. 2013. The use of sperm whale ivory in Chalcolithic Portugal. Trabajos de Prehistoria 70: 185203. https://doi.org/10.3989/tp.2013.12109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serangeli I. Dalmau, J. 2001. La zona de costa en Europa durante la última glaciación. Consideraciones al análisis de restos y representaciones de focas, cetáceos y alcas gigantes. Cypsela 13: 123–36.Google Scholar
Speller, C. et al. 2016. Barcoding the largest animals on Earth: ongoing challenges and molecular solutions in the taxonomic identification of ancient cetaceans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371: 20150332. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tusa, S. 2004. L'arte preistorica della Sicilia, in Anati, E., Mensi, N. & Marretta, A. (ed.) Bollettino del Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici 34: 3388. Capo di Ponte: Edizioni del Centro.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Monte d'Accoddi: location map and aerial photograph of the site (photographs courtesy of Oben srl).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Plan of the site and location of the find (red star) (after Melis 2011).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Sperm whale tooth (photographs by M. Zedda).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Radiocarbon-dating of the sperm whale tooth sample (date calibrated in OxCal v4.4.3 using the IntCal20 atmospheric curve (Reimer et al.2020; Bronk Ramsey 2021)).