Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T07:39:15.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fundamentality without Metaphysical Monism: Response to Critics of Reason in the World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

James Kreines
James Kreines*
Affiliation:
Claremont-McKenna College, USAjkreines@cmc.edu
Get access

Abstract

This article is a reply to comments by Franz Knappik and Robert Stern on my book, Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and its Philosophical Appeal. Issues addressed include the systematicity of Hegel’s philosophy, the prioritizing of metaphysical over epistemological questions in his arguments, Hegel’s response to Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason, and my conclusion that there are senses in which Hegel’s own position is both ambitiously metaphysical and also monist, but that the monism present there is epistemological, and the ambitious metaphysics is non-monist.

Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , May 2018 , pp. 138 - 156
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beiser, F. C. (2005), Hegel. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, P. (2005), All or Nothing. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1979), ‘Spinoza’s Ontological Argument’, The Philosophical Review 88:2: 198–223.Google Scholar
Inwood, M. (1983), Hegel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kim, J. (1994), ‘Explanatory Knowledge and Metaphysical Dependence’, Philosophical Issues 5: 51–69.Google Scholar
Knappik, F. (2016), ‘And Yet He is a Monist: Comments on James Kreines’, Reason in the World, Hegel Bulletin. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2016.30Google Scholar
Kreines, J. (2015), Reason in the World: Hegel’s Metaphysics and its Philosophical Appeal. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, R. (1989), Hegel’s Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. (2014), ‘The Significance of Self-Consciousness in Idealist Theories of Logic’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society CXIV, part 2: 145–66.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2009), Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, R. (2016), ‘Kreines on the Problem of Metaphysics in Kant and Hegel’, Hegel Bulletin. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2016.29Google Scholar