Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:50:40.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Provision of electroconvulsive therapy in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2022

Richard Braithwaite*
Affiliation:
Lead Consultant Psychiatrist for Neuromodulation, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Meadowfield Hospital, Worthing, UK. Email: richard.braithwaite@nhs.net
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

24 March 2022

Sashidharan lauds Trieste's ‘humane, person-centred and effective’ psychiatric servicesReference Sashidharan1 but omits to mention that, in common with most Italian cities, it has no electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) service.Reference Mezzina2 Indeed, only a handful of Italian centres offer the treatment, a lack of provision that has its basis entirely in politics rather than science.Reference Buccelli, Di Lorenzo, Paternoster, D'Urso, Graziano and Niola3 Since ECT was first developed in Rome in 1938Reference Buccelli, Di Lorenzo, Paternoster, D'Urso, Graziano and Niola3,Reference Gazdag and Ungvari4 and its lifesaving properties promptly recognised, it has been refined and improved to enhance its safety and effectiveness, while a large evidence base has built up to inform its ongoing use.Reference Kirov, Jauhar, Sienaert, Kellner and McLoughlin5 An extremely safe treatment, it is undoubtedly the most effective strategy for moderate to severe depressive illnessReference Kirov, Jauhar, Sienaert, Kellner and McLoughlin5 and one of the most effective treatments across the whole of psychiatry.Reference Gazdag and Ungvari4 Yet, staggeringly, Sashidharan's fellow ideological proponent of the Trieste model of care, Mezzina, has written positively of the lack of access its patients have to ECT, as though this vast gap in service provision were something of which to be proud.Reference Mezzina2 This could not happen in any other branch of medicine: it is akin to an oncologist boasting of an inability to provide patients with chemotherapy. It has been convincingly argued that refusal to provide ECT, when clinically indicated, is an infringement of patients' human rights.Reference Gazdag and Ungvari4 Indeed, most low- and middle-income countries strive to provide ECT services, even if access is limited owing to minimal resources. A supposedly ‘humane, person-centred and effective’Reference Sashidharan1 psychiatric service in western Europe cannot continue to justify denying its patients such a safe and effective treatment.

Declaration of interest

None

References

Sashidharan, SP. Why Trieste matters. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 220: 52–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezzina, R. Community mental health care in Trieste and beyond. J Nerv Ment Dis 2014; 202: 440–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buccelli, C, Di Lorenzo, P, Paternoster, M, D'Urso, G, Graziano, V, Niola, M. Electroconvulsive therapy in Italy: will public controversies ever stop? J ECT 2016; 32: 207–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazdag, G, Ungvari, GS. Electroconvulsive therapy: 80 years old and still going strong. World J Psychiatry 2019; 9: 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirov, G, Jauhar, S, Sienaert, P, Kellner, CH, McLoughlin, DM. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression: 80 years of progress. Br J Psychiatry 2021; 219: 594–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.