Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:57:52.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negotiation, Meet New Governance: Interests, Skills, and Selves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Amy J. Cohen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I critically examine two bodies of scholarship: negotiation literature and new governance literature. To that end, I consider The Negotiator's Fieldbook (2006), an ambitious survey of negotiation theory and practice edited by Andrea Kupfer Schneider and Christopher Honeyman, and key works by U.S. new governance architects, Michael Dorf, Charles Sabel, and William Simon. This comparison may surprise readers since negotiation literature largely focuses on interpersonal dynamics, and new governance literature aims at institutional change. I argue that these two literatures share similar assumptions about subjectivity that drive their sense of political hopefulness. In short, both envision a flexible problem-solving subject—shaped in negotiation by a discourse of skills and in new governance by a discourse of institutional design. Based on this descriptive claim, I illustrate how reading these literatures together suggests alternative perspectives from which to consider questions of power, inequality, and distribution relevant to both fields.

When no firm and lasting ties any longer unite men, it is impossible to obtain the cooperation of any great number of them unless you can persuade every man whose help is required that he serves his private interests by voluntarily uniting his efforts to those of all the others.

Alexis de Tocqueville (1969, 517)

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , Spring 2008 , pp. 501 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abel, Richard. 1985. Informalism: A Tactical Equivalent to Law? Clearinghouse Review 19 (4): 375–83.Google Scholar
Abramson, , Harold. 2006. The Culturally Suitable Mediator. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 591–602.Google Scholar
Adler, Peter S. 2006. Protean Negotiation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 17–27.Google Scholar
Alberstein, Michal. 2002. Pragmatism and Law: From Philosophy to Dispute Resolution. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Avruch, Kevin. 2006a. The Poverty of Buyer and Seller. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 81–86.Google Scholar
Avruch, Kevin. 2006b. Toward an Expanded “Canon” of Negotiation Theory: Identity, Ideological, and Values-Based Conflict and the Need for a New Heuristic. Marquette Law Review 89 (3): 567–82.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2001. What Happens Next Is Up to You: Human Rights at Risk in Dams and Development. American University International Law Review 16 (6): 1507–29.Google Scholar
Bendersky, Corinne. 2007. Complementarities in Organizational Dispute Resolution Systems: How System Characteristics Affect Individuals’ Conflict Experiences. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 60 (2): 204–24.Google Scholar
Bernard, Phyllis E. 2006. Power, Powerlessness and Process. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 257–262.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Gabriel. 1997. Training in Skills for Coping with Democracy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 552 (1): 114–24.Google Scholar
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. 2006a. Avoiding Negotiating: Strategy and Practice. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 113–120.Google Scholar
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. 2006b. The New Urban Governance: Processes for Engaging Citizens and Stakeholders. Review of Policy Research 23 (4): 815–26.Google Scholar
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Nabatchi, Tina, and O'Leary, Rosemary. 2005. The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government. Public Administration Review 65 (5): 547–58.Google Scholar
Blok, K., Hass, L., and Davis, J. R. 2003a. Stakeholder Involvement in Options Assessment: Promoting Dialogue in Meeting Water and Energy Needs. Executive Guide for Task Managers and Clients of the World Bank Group Involved in Water Resources Development and Management. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/esmap/site.nsf/files/wb+dam+booklet+10.9.03.pdf/$FILE/wb+dam+booklet+10.9.03.pdf (accessed November 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Blok, K., Hass, L., and Davis, J. R. 2003b. Stakeholder Involvement in Options Assessment: Promoting Dialogue in Meeting Water and Energy Needs. A Sourcebook. ESMAP Report 264/03. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2003/11/18/000012009_20031118154757/Rendered/PDF/esm2640paper.pdf (accessed November 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Blum, Gabriella, and Mnookin, Robert H. 2006. When Not to Negotiate. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 101–112.Google Scholar
Bohmer, Carol, and Ray, Marilyn L. 1994. Effects of Different Dispute Resolution Methods on Women and Children After Divorce. Family Law Quarterly 28 (2): 223–45.Google Scholar
Bosshard, Peter. 2005. A Blue-Ribbon Report that Made a Difference. http://www.irn/org/wcd/5/051107oped.html (accessed October 8, 2007).Google Scholar
Búrca, Gráinne de, and Scott, Joanne, eds. 2006. Law and New Governance in the EU and the US. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Campbell, Marcia Caton, and Docherty, Jayne Seminare. 2006. What's in a Frame? In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 37–46.Google Scholar
Cede, Franz. 2007. Review of The Negotiator's Fieldbook . PinPoints 28:26–27.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary. 1997. Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking. Duke Law Journal 46 (6): 1255–1349.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2006. Debating the Globalization of U.S. Mediation: Politics, Power, and Practice in Nepal. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 11:295–353.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1998. Dahl on Democracy and Equal Consideration. http://web.mit.edu/polisci/research/cohen/dahl_on_democracy.pdf (accessed July 5, 2007, not accessible as of December 19, 2007).Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Joel Rogers. 2003. Power and Reason. In Fung and Wright 2003a, 237–55.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua, and Sabel, Charles. 1997. Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal 3 (4): 313–42.Google Scholar
Coleman, Peter T., and Lim, Ying Ying Joanne. 2001. A Systematic Approach to Evaluating the Effects of Collaborative Negotiation Training on Individuals and Groups. Negotiation Journal 17 (4): 363–92.Google Scholar
Coleman, Peter T., Bui-Wrzosinska, Lan, Vallacher, Robin R., and Nowak, Andrzej. 2006. Protracted Conflicts as Dynamical Systems. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 61–73.Google Scholar
Condlin, Robert. Forthcoming. Every Day and in Every Way, We Are All Becoming Meta and Meta: Or How Communitarian Bargaining Theory Conquered the World (of Bargaining Theory). Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, Barbara. 1999. The Will to Empower: Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Albie M. 1989. An Interview with Mary Parker Follett. Negotiation Journal 5 (3): 223–35.Google Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 1999. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, Dunn, Chris, Brown, Pamela, Lee, Helena, and Hubbert, David. 1985. Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution. Wisconsin Law Review 6:1359–1404.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Morton. 2006. Internal and External Conflict. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 231–38.Google Scholar
Docherty, Jayne Seminare. 2006. The Unstated Models in Our Minds. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 7–16.Google Scholar
Dominguez, David. 2005. Getting Beyond Yes to Collaborative Justice: The Role of Negotiation in Community Lawyering. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 12 (1): 55–93.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. 2003. Legal Indeterminacy and Institutional Design. New York University Law Review 78 (3): 875–981.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., and Sabel, Charles F. 1998. A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review 98 (2): 267–473.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C., and Sabel, Charles F. 2000. Drug Treatment Courts and Emergent Experimentalist Government. Vanderbilt Law Review 53 (3): 831–83.Google Scholar
Elster, John. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger. 1964. Fractionating Conflict. Daedalus 93:920–41.Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger, and Ury, William. 1981. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, ed. Patton, Bruce. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1984. Against Settlement. Yale Law Journal 93 (6): 1073–90.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1918. The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. Repr., Gloucester, MA: Longmans, Green and Co., 1965.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. Technologies of the Self. In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, ed. Martin, Luther H., Gutman, Huck, and Hutton, Patrick H. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Elliot M., and Urwick, L., eds. 1973. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. 2nd ed. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody. 2000. The Private Role in Public Governance. New York University Law Review 75 (3): 543–675.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody, and Langbein, Laura I. 2000. Regulatory Negotiation and the Legitimacy Benefit. New York University Environmental Law Journal 9 (1): 60–151.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2003. Deliberative Democracy, Chicago Style: Grass-roots Governance in Policing and Public Education. In Fung and Wright 2003a, 111–43.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon. 2004. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik Olin, eds. 2003a. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovation in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik Olin. 2003b. Countervailing Power in Empowered Participatory Governance. In Fung and Wright 2003a, 259–90.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik Olin. 2003c. Thinking about Empowered Participatory Governance. In Fung and Wright 2003a, 3–44.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, O'Rourke, Dara, and Sabel, Charles. 2001. Can We Put an End to Sweatshops?, ed. Cohen, Joshua and Rogers, Joel. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Funk, William. 1997. Bargaining Toward the New Millennium: Regulatory Negotiation and the Subversion of the Public Interest. Duke Law Journal 46 (6): 1351–88.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L., and Liebman, James S. 2004. Experimentalist Equal Protection. Yale Law & Policy Review 22 (2): 261–327.Google Scholar
Gauvin, Stephane, Lilien, Gary L., and Chatterjee, Kalyan. 1990. The Impact of Information and Computer Based Training on Negotiator's Performance. Theory and Decision 28 (3): 331–54.Google Scholar
Gershon, Ilana. n.d. Neoliberal Agency (manuscript in author's possession).Google Scholar
Genovese, Eugene D. 1974. Roll, Jordan, Roll: The World the Slaves Made. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Gerstenberg, Oliver, and Sabel, Charles F. 2002. Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy: An Institutional Ideal for Europe? In Good Governance in Europe's Integrated Market, ed. Joerges, Christian and Dehousse, Renaud. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goh, Bee Chen. 2006. Typical Errors of Westerners. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 293–300.Google Scholar
Grillo, Trina. 1991. The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women. Yale Law Journal 100 (6): 1545–1610.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris. 2006. Courting Compliance. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 371–76.Google Scholar
Guthrie, Chris, and Sally, David F. 2006. Miswanting. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 277–82.Google Scholar
Hahn, Steven. 2006. Divine Rights. Review of The Mind of the Master Class: History and Faith in the Southern Slaveholders’ Worldview by Elizabeth Fox-Genovese and Eugene D. Genovese and Dwelling Place: A Plantation Epic by Erskine Clarke. New Republic, Feb. 6, 28–33.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet. 2006. Split Decisions: How and Why to Take a Break from Feminism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M., Jr., and Sacks, Albert M. 1994. The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, ed. Eskridge, William N. Jr and Frickey, Philip P. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Harter, Philip J. 1982. Negotiating Regulations: A Cure for Malaise. Georgetown Law Journal 71 (1): 1–118.Google Scholar
Harter, Philip J. 2000. Assessing the Assessors: The Actual Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking. New York University Environmental Law Journal 9 (1): 32–59.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Terri. 2004. Turning the WCD into Action. World Rivers Review 19 (6): 8–9, 15.Google Scholar
Hauss, Charles. 2006. Retraining Ourselves for Conflict Transformation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 637–44.Google Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa Riles. 2006. Making Interest: On Representation and Democratic Legitimacy. Paper presented at the Yale Conference on Representation and Popular Rule, October 28, 2006, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Heen, Sheila, and Stone, Douglas. 2006. Perceptions and Stories. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 343–350.Google Scholar
Hermann, Michele, LaFree, Gary, Rack, Christine, and West, Mary Beth. 1993. The MetroCourt Project Final Report: A Study of the Effects of Ethnicity and Gender in Mediated and Adjudicated Small Claim Cases at the Metropolitan Court Mediation Center, Bernalillo County, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico [Center for the Study and Resolution of Disputes, Institute of Public Law]. Google Scholar
Hershkoff, Helen, and Kingsbury, Benedict. 2003. Crisis, Community, and Courts in Network Governance: A Response to Liebman and Sabel's Approach to Reform of Pubic Education. New York University Review of Law & Social Change 28 (2): 319–26.Google Scholar
Honeyman, Christopher. 2006. Understanding Mediators. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 581–90.Google Scholar
Honeyman, Christopher, and Schneider, Andrea Kupfer. 2004. Catching Up with the Major-General: The Need for a “Canon of Negotiation.” Marquette Law Review 87 (4): 637–48.Google Scholar
Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger, Dudley, Bruce, and Acikgoz, Kamile. 1994. Effects of Conflict Resolution Training on Elementary School Students. Journal of Social Psychology 134 (6): 803–17.Google Scholar
Johnson, David W., and Johnson, Roger T. 1996. Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation Programs in Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research 66 (4): 459–506.Google Scholar
Karkkainen, Bradley C. 2001/02. Collaborative Ecosystem Governance: Scale, Complexity, and Dynamism. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 21 (2): 189–243.Google Scholar
Karkkainen, Bradley C. 2002. Environmental Lawyering in the Age of Collaboration. Wisconsin Law Review 2:555–74.Google Scholar
Karkkainen, Bradley C. 2004. “New Governance” in Legal Thought and in the World: Some Splitting as Antidote to Overzealous Lumping. Minnesota Law Review 89 (2): 471–97.Google Scholar
Karkkainen, Bradley C. 2006. Information-forcing Regulation and Environmental Governance. In Búrca and Scott 2006, 293–322.Google Scholar
Kelly, Loretta. 2006. Indigenous Experiences in Negotiation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 301–14.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell. 2006. On Bargaining Power. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 251–56.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell, and Guthrie, Chris. 2006. Heuristics and Biases at the Bargaining Table. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 351–60.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell, Moffitt, Michael L., and Welsh, Nancy A. 2006. The Law of Bargaining. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 183–90.Google Scholar
LaFree, Gary, and Rack, Christine. 1996. The Effects of Participants’ Ethnicity and Gender on Monetary Outcomes in Mediated and Adjudicated Civil Cases. Law & Society Review 30 (4): 767–97.Google Scholar
Lax, David A., and Sebenius, James K. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lax, David A., and Sebenius, James K. 2006. 3-D Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, Jacques. 2005. Deep Water: The Epic Struggle Over Dams, Displaced People, and the Environment. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Liebman, James S., and Sabel, Charles F. 2003. A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform. New York University Review of Law & Social Change 28 (2): 183–304.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2004. The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought. Minnesota Law Review 89 (2): 342–470.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2006. Governing Occupational Safety in the United States. In Búrca and Scott 2006, 269–92.Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly. 2007. The Paradox of Extralegal Activism: Critical Legal Consciousness and Transformative Politics. Harvard Law Review 120 (4): 937–88.Google Scholar
Lustig, Doreen, and Kingsbury, Benedict. 2006. Displacement and Relocation from Protected Areas: International Law Perspectives on Rights, Risks and Resistance. Conservation & Society 4 (3): 404–18.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1843. On the Jewish Question. In The Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Tucker, Robert C., 26–52. 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1978.Google Scholar
Matchavariani, Ivane. 1997. The Peace Process and Transition to Democratic Rule in the Republic of Georgia. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 552 (1): 98–106.Google Scholar
Mayer, Bernard. 2006. Allies in Negotiation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 603–13.Google Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia. 1981. Peasant Cooperatives and Political Change in Peru. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCully, Patrick. 2001. The Use of a Trilateral Network: An Activist's Perspective on the Formation of the World Commission on Dams. American University International Law Review 16 (6): 1453–75.Google Scholar
McDonald, John W. 2006. A New Future for Kashmir? In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 715–22.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A., and Maiman, Richard J. 1981. Small Claims Court Mediation in Maine: An Empirical Assessment. Maine Law Review 33:237–68.Google Scholar
McEwen, Craig A., Rogers, Nancy H., and Maiman, Richard J. 1995. Bring in the Lawyers: Challenging the Dominant Approaches to Ensuring Fairness in Divorce Mediation. Minnesota Law Review 79 (6): 1317–1411.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1984. Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving. UCLA Law Review 31 (4): 754–842.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2000. Mothers and Fathers of Invention: The Intellectual Founders of ADR. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 16 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2002. The Lawyer as Consensus Builder: Ethics for a New Practice. Tennessee Law Review 70 (1): 63–119.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2004/05. The Lawyer's Role(s) in Deliberative Democracy. Nevada Law Journal 5 (2): 347–69.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2006a. Deliberative Democracy and Conflict Resolution: Two Theories and Practices of Participation in the Polity. Dispute Resolution Magazine 12 (2): 18–22.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2006b. The Ethics of Compromise. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 155–64.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 2006c. Why Hasn't the World Gotten to Yes? An Appreciation and Some Reflections. Negotiation Journal 4 (4): 485–503.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H., Peppet, Scott R., and Tulumello, Andrew S. 2000. Beyond Winning: Negotiating to Create Value in Deals and Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 1995. Civilization and Its Negotiators. In Understanding Disputes: The Politics of Argument, ed. Caplan, Pat, 39–63. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, and Grande, Elisabetta. 2002. Reply, Current Illusions and Delusions about Conflict Management—In Africa and Elsewhere. Law & Social Inquiry 27 (3): 631–33.Google Scholar
Patkar, Medha. 2006. Beyond the WCD: Towards a New Political Reality? In Conference Report: Taking the WCD Report to the Next Level, ed. Schneider, Ann Kathrin, 11–12. Berkeley, CA: International Rivers Network. http://www.irn.org/wcd/pdf/060313nxlevel.pdf (accessed November 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Pearlstein, Arthur B. 2007. The Justice Bazaar: Dispute Resolution through Emergent Private Ordering as a Superior Alternative to Authoritarian Court Bureaucracy. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 22 (3): 739–95.Google Scholar
Peppet, Scott R., and Moffitt, Michael L. 2006. Learning How to Learn to Negotiate. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 615–26.Google Scholar
Pottinger, Lori. 2007. Analyzing Bujagali Hydroelectric Project's Compliance with the Strategic Priorities of the World Commission on Dam. Berkeley, CA: International Rivers Network.Google Scholar
Powell, John A., and Spencer, Marguerite L. 2003. Brown Is Not Brown and Educational Reform Is Not Reform if Integration Is Not a Goal. New York University Review of Law & Social Change 28 (2): 343–51.Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reuben, Richard C. 2005. Democracy and Dispute Resolution: Systems Design and the New Workplace. Harvard Negotiation Law Review 10: 11–68.Google Scholar
Ricigliano, Robert. 2006. A Three-Dimensional Analysis of Negotiation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 55–60.Google Scholar
Riskin, Leonard L. 2006. Knowing Yourself: Mindfulness. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 239–50.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César A. 2005a. Global Governance and Labor Rights: Codes of Conduct and Anti-Sweatshop Struggles in Global Apparel Factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Politics & Society 33 (2): 203–33.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César A. 2005b. Nike's Law: The Anti-Sweatshop Movement, Transnational Corporations, and the Struggle over International Labor Rights in the Americas. In Santos and Rodríguez-Garavito 2005a, 64–91.Google Scholar
Rose, Daniel. 2006. Ulysses and Business Negotiation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 711–14.Google Scholar
Ryan, Cheyney. 2006. Rawls on Negotiating Justice. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 75–80.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. 2004. Beyond Principal-Agent Governance: Experimentalist Organizations, Learning, and Accountability. In De Staat van de Democratie. Democratie voorbij de Staat, ed. Engelen, Ewald R. and Ho, Monika Sie Dhian, 173–95. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H. 2004. Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds. Harvard Law Review 117 (4): 1015–1101.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F., and Simon, William H. 2006. Epilogue: Accountability Without Sovereignty. In Búrca and Scott 2006, 395–412.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles, Fung, Archon, and Karkkainen, Bradley. 2000. Beyond Backyard Environmentalism, ed. Cohen, Joshua and Rogers, Joel. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Sally, David. 1995. Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society 7 (1): 58–92.Google Scholar
Sally, David F., and Jones, Gregory Todd. 2006. Game Theory Behaves. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 87–94.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Valerie A. 2003. Back to the Future of ADR: Negotiating Justice and Human Needs. Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 18 (3): 669–776.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2005. Beyond Neoliberal Governance: The World Social Forum as Subaltern Cosmopolitan Politics and Legality. In Santos and Rodríguez-Garavito 2005a, 29–63.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, and Rodríguez-Garavito, César A., eds. 2005a. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, and Rodríguez-Garavito, César A. 2005b. Law, Politics, and the Subaltern in Counter-Hegemonic Globalization. In Santos and Rodríguez-Garavito 2005a, 1–26.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. 2004. Democratic Experimentalism or Capitalist Synchronization? Critical Reflections on Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 17 (1): 101–27.Google Scholar
Schneider, Andrea Kupfer. 2006. Aspirations. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 271–76.Google Scholar
Schneider, Andrea Kupfer, and Honeyman, Christopher, eds. 2006. The Negotiator's Fieldbook: The Desk Reference for the Experienced Negotiator. Washington, DC: ABA Section of Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ann Kathrin. 2005. From Commitment to Implementation: The Report of the World Commission on Dams after Five Years. Berkeley, CA: International Rivers Network. http://www.irn.org/wcd/5/pdf/051107flyer.pdf. (accessed November 4, 2007).Google Scholar
Scott, Joanne, and Sturm, Susan P. Forthcoming. Courts as Catalysts: Rethinking the Judicial Role in New Governance. Columbia Journal of European Law.Google Scholar
Selmi, Daniel P. 2005. The Promises and Limits of Negotiated Rulemaking: Evaluating the Negotiation of a Regional Air Quality Rule. Environmental Law 35 (3): 415–69.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1999. [1987]. Commodities and Capabilities, 4th Impression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Daniel L. 2006a. Identity: More then Meets the “I.” In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 225–30.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Daniel L. 2006b. Untapped Power: Emotions in Negotiation. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 263–70.Google Scholar
Shell, G. Richard. 1999. Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, Donna. 2006. Psychology and Persuasion. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 361–70.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1985. Legal Informality and Redistributive Politics. Clearinghouse Review 19 (4): 384–91.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2004. Solving Problems vs. Claiming Rights: The Pragmatist Challenge to Legal Liberalism. William and Mary Law Review 46 (1): 127–212.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2006. Toyota Jurisprudence: Legal Theory and Rolling Rule Regimes. In Búrca and Scott 2006, 37–64.Google Scholar
Stevahn, Laurie, Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., and Real, Don. 1996. The Impact of a Cooperative or Individualistic Context on the Effectiveness of Conflict Resolution Training. American Educational Research Journal 33 (4): 801–23.Google Scholar
Stevahn, Laurie, Johnson, David W., Johnson, Roger T., Oberle, Katie, and Wahl, Leslie. 2000. Effects of Conflict Resolution Training Integrated into a Kindergarten Curriculum. Child Development 71 (3): 772–84.Google Scholar
Stone, Douglas, Patton, Bruce, and Heen, Sheila. 1999. Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan. 2001. Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach. Columbia Law Review 101 (3): 458–568.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan. 2006. Gender Equity Regimes and the Architecture of Learning. In Búrca and Scott 2006, 323–60.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan, and Gadlin, Howard. 2007. Conflict Resolution and Systemic Change. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1:1–63.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence, McKearnan, Sarah, and Thomas-Larmer, Jennifer, eds. 1999. The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence, and Hoben, Merrick. 2004. Making Regional Policy Dialogues Work: A Credo for Metro-Scale Consensus Building. Temple Environmental Law and Technology Journal 22 (2): 123–38.Google Scholar
Susskind, Lawrence, and Cruikshank, Jeffrey. 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, Leigh L. 2001. The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969. Democracy in America. Trans. Lawrence, George, ed. Mayer, J. P. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Trubek, Louise G. 2006. New Governance Practices in US Health Care. In Búrca and Scott 2006, 245–68.Google Scholar
Urciuoli, Bonnie. Forthcoming. Skills and Selves in the New Workplace. American Ethnologist.Google Scholar
Ury, William L., Brett, Jeanne M., and Goldberg, Stephen B. 1988. Getting Disputes Resolved: Designing Systems to Cut the Costs of Conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Walton, Richard E., and McKersie, Robert B. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Welsh, Nancy A. 2002. Disputants’ Decision Control in Court-Connected Mediation: A Hollow Promise Without Procedural Justice. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1:179–92.Google Scholar
Welsh, Nancy A. 2006. Perceptions of Fairness. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 165–74.Google Scholar
White, Lucie. 2000. Global Forces, Life Projects, and the Place of Care: Conversations with Women in Project Head Start. In Globalizing Institutions: Case Studies in Regulation and Innovation, ed. Jenson, Jane and De Sousa Santos, Boaventura, 145–68. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Williams, Gerald R. 1983. Legal Negotiation and Settlement. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
World Commission on Dams. 2000. Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. http://www.dams.org/report (accessed October 8, 2007).Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William. 2006. Timing and Ripeness. In Schneider and Honeyman 2006, 143–52.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 amending Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community, in respect of the Kyoto Protocol's project mechanisms. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2004/l_338/l_33820041113en00180023.pdf (accessed January 7, 2008).Google Scholar
The Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1990, 5 U.S.C. §§ 561–570.Google Scholar