Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:43:53.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seroprevalence of hepatitis A virus antibody in a population aged 0–30 years in Shanghai, China: implications for hepatitis A immunization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2012

Y. ZHU
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China Shanghai Municipal Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, PR China
Z. YUAN
Affiliation:
Shanghai Municipal Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, PR China
Q. ZHAO
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
G. CHEN
Affiliation:
Hepatitis B Foundation, Doylestown, PA, USA
B. XU*
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
*
*Author for correspondence: Professor B. Xu, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China. (Email: bxu@shmu.edu.cn)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study aimed to determine current seroprevalence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody in subjects aged 0–30 years in Shanghai. A total of 5515 subjects were recruited through random clustering sampling in 2009. Basic clinical and demographic information and records of HAV vaccination were acquired by questionnaire interviews and review of immunization records. Serum samples were collected and tested for anti-HAV IgM and total anti-HAV. The overall seroprevalence of total anti-HAV was 52·9%. Subjects aged 20–24 years had the lowest (34·4%) anti-HAV seropositivity and subjects aged 5–9 years had the highest (74·6%) positivity. Seroprevalence was significantly greater in subjects from suburban areas than in subjects from urban areas. Subjects who had HAV immunizations had significantly greater seropositivity for total anti-HAV. Previous hepatitis A immunization policies had a significant impact on the presence of anti-HAV seroprevalence in a population aged 0–30 years from Shanghai.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

INTRODUCTION

Infection with the hepatitis A virus (HAV) remains a significant public health problem in certain geographical regions, especially developing countries. HAV has a high prevalence in South East Asia and is considered endemic to this region [Reference Fiore, Wasley and Bell1]. A population-based survey conducted in 1992–1995 reported that the seroprevalence of HAV antibodies was 80·9% in China [Reference Dai2]. In 1990, there were 637 717 cases of hepatitis A in China, and the incidence rate was 55·7/100 000 [Reference Li and Liang3]. Shanghai, which is on the eastern coast of China, experienced a serious HAV outbreak in 1988 due to the consumption of infected raw clams, and more than 300 000 residents developed hepatitis A [Reference Halliday4Reference Kang6]. This is the largest reported outbreak of hepatitis A.

Hundreds of new sporadic cases of HAV infection are reported every year in Shanghai. Due to its coastal location, consumption of possibly infected shellfish and other seafood is common. A recent study detected HAV in aquatic products collected from local markets in Shanghai, and that the rate of HAV positivity in seafood was as high as 13·83% [Reference Zhu7]. Control of HAV in patients and seafood is necessary to prevent future outbreaks [Reference Pinto, Costafreda and Bosch8].

Previous studies [Reference Wasley, Samandari and Bell9, Reference Chodick10] have demonstrated that HAV vaccination has clear effects on the incidence rate of HAV infection. HAV vaccines have been available in Shanghai since the early 1990s. School children are given priority and other residents pay out-of-pocket for the vaccination. The incidence rate in Shanghai and other eastern regions was significantly lower than the national average in recent years [Reference Li and Liang3, Reference Zheng11]. Since 2009, free hepatitis A vaccinations were offered to all children in Shanghai born after 1 July 2006.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the anti-HAV seroprevalence of children and young adults in Shanghai in order to provide a basis for the development and implementation of immunization policies for the prevention of hepatitis A epidemics in a high-risk population.

METHODS

Study design and population

This was a clustering cross-sectional study of people aged 0–30 years who lived in six of the 18 districts of Shanghai, representing urban and suburban areas. The population of the six surveyed districts (∼8 million residents) represented 41·5% of the total population of Shanghai. The estimated sample size was 4378 at the 68·7% prevalence of HAV infection according to historical surveillance data. Considering the possibility of non-response (20%), the sample size was enlarged to 5253. Three communities were randomly selected in each district and 300 subjects were selected from each community, with a total of 10 subjects of each age from 0 to 30 years. Subjects were recruited continuously from community residents who visited the community centreduring the period January–December 2009.

Specimen and data collection

A 2-ml blood sample was collected from each study subject, centrifuged for separation of sera, and stored at −20 °C before testing. Each study participant also completed a questionnaire that assessed demographic information, history of previous hepatitis A vaccination, and history of hepatitis diagnosis and treatment. Participants were asked to bring their immunization records during interview. Hepatitis A vaccination status was determined by vaccination records and self-report. Questions about vaccination status on the questionnaire was grouped as yes/no/unknown. For children aged 1–14 years, the questionnaire was completed by their parents or guardians.

Laboratory assays

All blood samples were tested for anti-HAV IgM and total anti-HAV. Anti-HAV IgM was measured qualitatively with an ELISA detection kit (Kehua Company, China). Total anti-HAV (including anti-HAV IgM and anti-HAV IgG) was measured quantitatively with an ELISA kit (ETI-AB-HAVK Plus, DiaSorin S.p.A., Italy). Anti-HAV positivity was defined at a cut-off value of 20 mIU/ml.

Ethical considerations

The Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Municipal Centre for Disease Control and Prevention approved the study protocol. All adult study participants and the parents or guardians of minors provided written informed consent.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered by use of double-entry and verified in EpiData 3.0 (EpiData Association, Denmark). Statistical analyses were performed using Stata v. 10 (StataCorp, USA) and SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., USA.). Continuous variables were expressed as means and categorical variables as percentages. Pearson's χ2 test and a χ2 test for trend were used to identify associations of categorical and ordinal data, respectively. Student's t test was used to compare the means of numerical data. Two-tailed tests were performed with a significance level of 0·05.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics of the study population

A total of 5515 subjects were enrolled in the study, which included 2172 subjects from urban areas and 3343 from suburban areas. Table 1 shows the distribution of study subjects by age and residential area. The mean age of the subjects was 14·3 ± 7·4 years (range 2 months to 30 years). A total of 2556 (46·3%) subjects were male and 2953 (53·7%) female.

Table 1. Age ranges and residential status of the study population

History of HAV infection

A total of 13 participants reported a previous diagnosis of hepatitis. Ten of these claimed to have been diagnosed and treated clinically as hepatitis A and the other three participants as hepatitis B or unidentified hepatitis. All 10 of these HAV-infected subjects were seropositive for anti-HAV, had an average anti-HAV concentration of 115·6 ± 7·7 mIU/ml (range 107·4–130·3 mIU/ml), and a mean age of 25·1 ± 4·2 years (range 18–30 years). One of the ten subjects was co-infected with HCV. The other three subjects were infected with unidentified hepatitis viruses, and all were anti-HAV negative.

HAV seroprevalence according to gender, age, and residential area

The overall seroprevalence of total anti-HAV was 52·9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51·5–54·2]. Table 2 shows the anti-HAV seroprevalence by gender, age, residential area, and immunization history. The highest anti-HAV seroprevalence was observed in children aged 0–4 years (66·9%, 95% CI 63·3–70·2) and those aged 5–9 years (74·6%, 95% CI 71·7–77·3). There was a significant trend for lower anti-HAV seroprevalence in the older age groups (trend χ2 = 244·1, P < 0·0001). A review of the immunization history of the study population indicated that anti-HAV seroprevalence was 87·4% (95% CI 85·7–88·9) in subjects with HAV vaccination and only 37·0% (95% CI 35·5–38·6) in those without HAV vaccination or with unknown vaccination history [odds ratio (OR) 0·08, 95% CI 0·07–0·10]. In the vaccinated group, HAV vaccination was based on self-report for 139 participants and on vaccination records for 1595 participants. For those with no or unknown vaccination, it was judged by records for 2343 subjects and by self-report for 1440 subjects.

Table 2. Seroprevalence of anti-HAV according to gender, age, residential area, and immunization history

OR, Odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

All subjects were born between 1980 and 2008, and the percentage of anti-HAV seroprevalence varied with age (Fig. 1). For males and females, the prevalence was 70–80% in subjects aged 2–8 years who were born during 2000–2007, declined to about 50% in teenagers born in 1990s and fell to almost 30% in subjects aged 20–23 years born around 1988. It then increased to nearly 60% in subjects born in early 1980s. There were no statistically significant differences in the seroprevalence of males and females (Pearson's χ2 = 0·4, P = 0·372).

Fig. 1. Anti-HAV seroprevalence of male and female subjects by age.

The distribution of seroprevalence of anti-HAV was remarkably different for subjects from urban and suburban areas (Pearson's χ2 = 43·2, P < 0·0001) (Fig. 2). For subjects aged 2–8 years born after 2000, the seroprevalence was >80% in suburban areas, but only 50% in urban areas. During the study period, urban areas had a significantly lower prevalence of anti-HAV than suburban areas (Pearson's χ2 = 55·8, P < 0·0001).

Fig. 2. Anti-HAV seroprevalence of urban and suburban subjects by age.

Anti-HAV quantitation by age, gender, residential area, and immunization status

We also analysed the total anti-HAV concentrations of subjects according to gender and residential area (Table 3). The results indicate that the mean concentration of anti-HAV was significantly higher in females than males (55·9 ± 1·0 mIU/ml vs. 52·9 ± 1·0 mIU/ml, t test = −2·2, P = 0·027). In addition, significantly more males had received hepatitis A vaccination than females [33·3% (95% CI 31·5–35·2) vs. 30·0% (95% CI 28·15–31·5); Pearson's χ2 = 7·9, P = 0·005]. The mean anti-HAV concentration was higher in subjects from suburban than urban areas (58·7 ± 0·9 mIU/ml vs. 48·1 ± 1·1 mIU/ml, t test = 7·5, P < 0·0001). There were also more subjects who had received vaccinations in suburban areas than in urban areas [35·9% (95% CI 34·3–37·6) vs. 24·4% (95% CI 22·7–26·3); Pearson's χ2 = 99·1, P < 0·0001].

Table 3. Total anti-HAV concentration according to gender and residential area

Table 4 shows the total anti-HAV concentrations for the different age groups. A total of 65·8% (95% CI 62·8–68·8) of subjects aged 5–9 years had a concentration >80 mIU/ml, but only 33·8% (95% CI 25·4–31·3) of subjects aged 20–24 years had a concentration >80 mIU/ml. There was a statistically significant trend for lower total anti-HAV concentration in the older age groups (trend χ2 = 669·6, P < 0·0001).

Table 4. Total anti-HAV concentration of different age groups

DISCUSSION

Population-based studies of HAV infection in different geographical regions of the world have reported significant differences in the prevalence of HAV infection [Reference Jacobsen and Wiersma12]. In middle- and low-income regions, where hepatitis A vaccination is not routine, HAV seroprevalence usually increases with age. Children are more frequently exposed to HAV and 100% seroprevalence of anti-HAV has been reported in some adult populations [Reference Li and Liang3]. Many epidemiological studies of HAV have focused on children because of their higher risk of transmission, the greater clinical significance of HAV infection in this age group, and because immunization recommendations often focus on this age group [Reference Singleton13]. A previous study in central Tunisia reported an overall anti-HAV seroprevalence of 60%, with significantly greater seroprevalence in adults than infants [Reference Letaief14]. A study in Lebanon reported a HAV seroprevalence of 11% in those aged 0–4 years, 28% in those aged 5–9 years, and 78% in adults aged ⩾21 years [Reference Sacy15]. In contrast, our study indicated that the anti-HAV seroprevalence was maximal (74·6%) in children aged 5–9 years and declined with age, with a minimum (34·4%) for those aged 20–24 years. In 1988–1989, there was an outbreak of hepatitis A in Shanghai, resulting in an estimated 310 000 cases [Reference Dai2, Reference Xiao5, Reference Kang6, Reference Xu16]. Subjects in our study who were older than 25–30 years were elementary school students at the time of this outbreak, and this age group had an anti-HAV seroprevalence of 56·3%. After this outbreak, there was a marked decrease in the incidence of hepatitis A, with only periodic small hepatitis A outbreaks, and a volunteer-based hepatitis A vaccination programme was implemented [Reference Xu17]. The lower infection rate of HAV and the effects of vaccination may explain the unique pattern of age-specific anti-HAV seroprevalence in our population, which is markedly different from those previously reported in developing regions [Reference Ceyhan18Reference Mukomolov20] and developed regions [Reference Chen21Reference Broman23] of the world.

Public health officials in Shanghai have developed strategies for hepatitis A prevention during the past two decades. In 1992, the first vaccine with attenuated HAV was licensed and made available to school children in Shanghai during 1994–1996. Since 1996, vaccines with inactivated HAV have been available for both children and adults in Shanghai. In 2000, HAV vaccination was recommended by the Shanghai Health Authority for all citizens of Shanghai on the basis of out-of-pocket payment. In 2008, the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) for HAV was implemented nationwide in China, and in 2009 Shanghai offered free inactivated hepatitis A vaccine to all children born after 1 July 2006. Children should be vaccinated according to a 0-, and 6-month schedule after 18 months. Two doses of inactivated HAV vaccine are given at ages 18 and 24 months, respectively. According to the Notifiable Infectious Disease Surveillance data in Shanghai, the incidence rate of hepatitis A declined rapidly after the initiation of these vaccination programmes [Reference Xu17], from over 20/100 000 in 1992, to 6·98/100 000 in 2000, and then 1·31/100 000 in 2009.

In our study, subjects with histories of hepatitis A vaccination had a much higher (89·3%) seroprevalence of anti-HAV than those without vaccination (33·9%). This is strong evidence that hepatitis A vaccination significantly impacted the distribution of anti-HAV seroprevalence in Shanghai. During 1992–1995, there was a nationwide serological survey of hepatitis A in China. The survey reported that the age-specific anti-HAV seropositivity rate in subjects aged 0–15 years in Shanghai was 23·7% [Reference Dai2], significantly lower than the 60·5% in our study. This provides additional evidence of the beneficial impact of HAV vaccination strategies in Shanghai.

Adults were always supposed to have acquired immunity through natural infection at an early age in developing countries [Reference Jacobsen and Koopman24]. However, we found that the total anti-HAV seropositivity rate of subjects aged 20–24 years and 25–30 years was relatively low (34·4% and 56·3%, respectively) and that the vaccination rate for these two age groups was also low (4·8% and 7·1%, respectively) in Shanghai. After the Shanghai outbreak in 1988, behavioural changes appear to have contributed to the low rate of HAV infection in young adults. The relatively low anti-HAV seroprevalence in these age groups indicates that the risk of HAV infection in young adults should be considered in policy decisions regarding HAV vaccination. In subjects aged 10–14 and 15–19 years (the groups that grew up in the early stage of HAV vaccination), the seropositivity rate was 46·1% and 46·5%, and the vaccination rate was 30·2% and 13·3%, respectively. Either one dose of attenuated vaccine or two doses of inactivated vaccine of HAV could have been applied. It was suggested that booster doses might be considered for single-dose vaccinated participants in these age groups [Reference Zheng and Cui25].

A previous study in Bangladesh reported that the anti-HAV seroprevalence in children and adolescents was higher in rural areas than in developed urban areas [Reference Saha26]. We found similar results in our study of HAV in Shanghai. Although hepatitis A vaccination may play a critical role in the greater seroprevalence of HAV antibodies (vaccination rate 35·9% in suburban and 24·4% in urban areas), it seems unlikely to explain all of our reported regional differences, especially for subjects born in the 2000s. Other social and environmental factors presumably have important influences on the risk of natural infection.

The main result of our study is that the anti-HAV seroprevalence in Shanghai increased significantly following implementation of HAV immunization strategies for children and adolescents. Future longitudinal observations are required to examine the effect of the EPI of HAV vaccination to further evaluate the effectiveness of hepatitis A vaccination strategies. It is likely that multiple approaches to hepatitis A prevention, such as immunization, health promotion, and improvement of socioeconomic conditions, will all contribute to more effective control of hepatitis A in Shanghai.

The anti-HAV seroprevalence and total anti-HAV level varied with age and residential area for subjects aged 0–30 years in Shanghai. The highest (67–75%) seroprevalence was in children. Social and economic development, changes in behaviour, and implementation of hepatitis A vaccination programmes appear to explain our results. Introduction of hepatitis A vaccination into the EPI would further help to control hepatitis A in Shanghai.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Shanghai Municipal Centre for Disease Control and Prevention and supported by grants from Shanghai Health Bureau.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1.Fiore, AE, Wasley, A, Bell, BP. Prevention of hepatitis A through active or passive immunization: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Morbidity Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports 2006; 55: 123.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Dai, Z. Seroepidemiological Survey of Viral Hepatitis in China 1992–1995. Beijing: Science and Technology Document Press, 1997, pp. 1937.Google Scholar
3.Li, L, Liang, X. Status and strategies of HAV and HBV control and prevention in China. Disease Surveillance 2009; 24: 307312.Google Scholar
4.Halliday, ML, et al. An epidemic of hepatitis A attributable to the ingestion of raw clams in Shanghai, China. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1991; 164: 852859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Xiao, Z, et al. Epidemiological analysis of hepatitis A in Shanghai. Chinese Journal of Public Health 1991; 10: 149152.Google Scholar
6.Kang, L, et al. An hepatitis A outbreak in Shanghai. Shanghai Medicine 1989; 12: 6465.Google Scholar
7.Zhu, Z, et al. Study on detection of hepatitis A virus in aquatic products by transcription PCR approaches. Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology 2005; 15: 677678.Google Scholar
8.Pinto, RM, Costafreda, MI, Bosch, A. Risk assessment in shellfish-borne outbreaks of hepatitis A. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2009; 75: 73507355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Wasley, A, Samandari, T, Bell, BP. Incidence of hepatitis A in the United States in the era of vaccination. Journal of American Medical Association 2005; 294: 194201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Chodick, G, et al. The shifting epidemiology of hepatitis A following routine childhood immunization program in Israel. Preventive Medicine 2007; 45: 386391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Zheng, H, et al. Epidemiological analysis on hepatitis A in China during 2004–2006. Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization 2007; 13: 336340.Google Scholar
12.Jacobsen, KH, Wiersma, ST. Hepatitis A virus seroprevalence by age and world region, 1990 and 2005. Vaccine 2010; 28: 66536657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Singleton, RJ, et al. Impact of a statewide childhood vaccine program in controlling hepatitis A virus infections in Alaska. Vaccine 2010; 28: 62986304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Letaief, A, et al. Age-specific seroprevalence of hepatitis a among school children in central Tunisia. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2005; 73: 4043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Sacy, RG, et al. Hepatitis a in Lebanon: a changing epidemiological pattern. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2005; 73: 453456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Xu, Z, et al. Etiology and prevention of hepatitis A of Shanghai in 1988. Medicine Research and Report 1992; 21: 2526.Google Scholar
17.Xu, Z, et al. Decline in the risk of hepatitis A virus infection in China, a country with booming economy and changing lifestyles. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 2008; 15 (Suppl. 2): 3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Ceyhan, M, et al. Differences in hepatitis A seroprevalence among geographical regions in Turkey: a need for regional vaccination recommendations. Journal of Viral Hepatitis 2008; 15 (Suppl. 2): 6972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Ahmed, M, et al. High prevalence of hepatitis A virus antibody among Bangladeshi children and young adults warrants pre-immunization screening of antibody in HAV vaccination strategy. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2009; 27: 4850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Mukomolov, SL, et al. Seroepidemiology of hepatitis A in Saint-Petersburg in 2009. Zhurnal Mikrobiologii Epidemiologii Immunobiologii 2010; Issue 5: 1520.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Chen, J, et al. Changing prevalence of anti-hepatitis A virus in adolescents in a rural township in Taiwan. Chang Gung Medical Journal 2010; 33: 321326.Google Scholar
22.Lee, D, et al. A nationwide seroprevalence of total antibody to hepatitis A virus from 2005 to 2009: age and area-adjusted prevalence rates. Korean Journal of Hepatology 2011; 17: 4450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Broman, M, et al. Epidemiology of hepatitis A in Finland in 1990–2007. Journal of Medical Virology 2010; 82: 934941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Jacobsen, KH, Koopman, JS. Declining hepatitis A seroprevalence: a global review and analysis. Epidemiology and infection 2004, 132: 10051022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Zheng, H, Cui, FQ. The immunogenicity and impact factors of hepatitis A attenuated live vaccine and inactivated vaccine. Zhongguo Yi Miao He Mian Yi 2009; 15: 371374.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Saha, SK, et al. Community-based cross-sectional seroprevalence study of hepatitis A in Bangladesh. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2009; 15: 49324937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Age ranges and residential status of the study population

Figure 1

Table 2. Seroprevalence of anti-HAV according to gender, age, residential area, and immunization history

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Anti-HAV seroprevalence of male and female subjects by age.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Anti-HAV seroprevalence of urban and suburban subjects by age.

Figure 4

Table 3. Total anti-HAV concentration according to gender and residential area

Figure 5

Table 4. Total anti-HAV concentration of different age groups