Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:46:34.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contingent Advantage? Sovereign Borrowing, Democratic Institutions and Global Capital Cycles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2019

Cameron Ballard-Rosa*
Affiliation:
UNC Chapel Hill, NC
Layna Mosley
Affiliation:
UNC Chapel Hill, NC
Rachel L Wellhausen
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin, TX
*
*Corresponding author: Email: cambr@email.unc.edu

Abstract

How do domestic and global factors shape governments’ capacity to issue debt in primary capital markets? Consistent with the ‘democratic advantage’, we identify domestic institutional mechanisms, including executive constraints and policy transparency, that facilitate debt issuance rather than electoral events. Most importantly, we argue that the democratic advantage is contingent: investors’ attention to domestic politics varies with conditions in global capital markets. When global financial liquidity is low, investors are risk-averse, and political risk constrains governments’ capacity to borrow. But when global markets are flush, investors are risk-tolerant and less sensitive to political risk. We support our argument with new data on 245,000 government bond issues in primary capital markets – the point at which governments’ costs of market access matter most – for 131 sovereign issuers (1990–2016). In doing so, we highlight the role of systemic factors, which are under-appreciated in much ‘open economy politics’ research, in determining access to capital markets.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archer, CC, Biglaiser, G and DeRouen, K (2007) Sovereign bonds and the “democratic advantage”: does regime type affect credit rating agency ratings in the developing world? International Organization 61 (2):341365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard-Rosa, C (2016) Hungry for change: urban bias and autocratic sovereign debt default. International Organization 70 (2):313346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard-Rosa, C (2018) Democracy, Dictatorship, and Default. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Ballard-Rosa, C, Mosley, L, Wellhausen, R (2019) Replication data for: contingent advantage? Sovereign borrowing, democratic institutions, and global capital cycles, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HPTPDQ, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:My2VQZ9AKHCI9MDlDSo1nw== [fileUNF]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauerle Danzman, S, Oatley, T and Winecoff, WK (2017) All crises are global: capital cycles in an imbalanced international political economy. International Studies Quarterly 61 (4):907923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, E, Cox, GW and Saiegh, S (2012) Sovereign debt and regime type: reconsidering the democratic advantage. International Organization 66 (4):709738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, MM (2009) The political sources of systematic investment risk: lessons from a consensus democracy. Journal of Politics 71, 661677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, W and Leblang, D (2006) Democratic Processes and Financial Markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, T and Kerner, A (2016) The influence of interest: real US interest rates and bilateral investment treaties. Review of International Organizations 11 (4):419448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biglaiser, G and Staats, JL (2012) Finding the ‘democratic advantage’ in sovereign bond ratings: the importance of strong courts, property rights protection, and the rule of law. International Organization 66 (3):515535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, S, Schrage, B and Vaaler, P (2005) Counting the investor vote: political business cycle effects on sovereign bond spreads in developing countries. Journal of International Business Studies 36, 6288.Google Scholar
Bodea, C and Hicks, R (2015) International finance and central bank independence: institutional diffusion and the flow and cost of capital. Journal of Politics 77 (1):268284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M, De Lira Salvatierra, I and Gulati, M (2014) Lawyers: gatekeepers of the sovereign debt market? International Review of Law and Economics 38, 150168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, S, Cunha, R and Mosley, L (2015) Categories, creditworthiness, and contagion: how investors’ shortcuts affect sovereign debt markets. International Studies Quarterly 59 (3):587601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, D (2014) The politics of financial booms and crises: evidence from Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 47 (2):260286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, D (2015) The Politics of Market Discipline in Latin America: Globalization and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, D and Zucco, C (2016) Presidential success and the world economy. The Journal of Politics 78 (2):589602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudoin, S, Milner, HV and Pang, X (2015) International systems and domestic politics: linking complex interactions with empirical models in international relations. International Organization 69 (2):275309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, MD and Ito, H (2006) What matters for financial development? Capital controls, institutions, and interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81 (1):163192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwieroth, JM (2014) Fashions and fads in finance: the political foundations of sovereign wealth fund creation. International Studies Quarterly 58, 752763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copelovitch, M, Gandrud, C and Hallerberg, M (2018) Financial data transparency, international institutions, and sovereign borrowing costs. International Studies Quarterly 62 (1):2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordes, T (2012) Sovereign ratings and economic liberalisation. In APSA 2012 Annual Meeting Paper.Google Scholar
Cox, G (2016) Marketing Sovereign Promises: Monopoly Brokerage and the Growth of the English State. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G and Saiegh, S (2018) Executive constraint and sovereign debt: quasi-experimental evidence from Argentina during the Baring crisis. Comparative Political Studies (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datz, G (2008) Governments as market players: state innovation in the global economy. Journal of International Affairs 64 (1):3549.Google Scholar
Devlin, R (1989) Debt and Crisis in Latin America: The Supply Side of the Story. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
DiGiuseppe, M and Shea, PE (2016) Borrowed time: sovereign finance, regime type, and leader survival. Economics and Politics 28 (3):342367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, A (2006) IMF and economic growth: the effects of programs, loans, and compliance with conditionality. World Development 34 (5):769788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J and Gersovitz, M (1981) Debt with potential repudiation: theoretical and empirical analysis. Review of Economic Studies 48 (2):289309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M, Flores, JH, Gaillard, N and Nieto-Parra, S (2009) The end of gatekeeping: underwriters and the quality of sovereign bond markets, 1815–2007. In Reichlin, L and West, K (eds), NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 5392.Google Scholar
Garriga, C (2016) Central bank reforms in the world: a new dataset. International Interactions 42 (5):849868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelos, RG, Sahay, E and Sandleris, G (2011) Sovereign borrowing by developing countries: what determines market access? Journal of International Economics 83, 243254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J (2013) The Company States Keep: International Economic Organizations and Investor Perceptions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J and Hicks, RP (2014) Reputations, perceptions and international economic agreements. International Interactions 40 (3):325349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, I (2006) The power of the markets? The international bond markets and the 2002 elections in Brazil. Review of International Political Economy 13 (1):5377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollyer, JR, Rosendorff, BP and Vreeland, JR (2011) Democracy and transparency. Journal of Politics 73 (4):11911205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, N and Schmith, S (2005) Market responses to politics: The rise of Lula and the decline of the Brazilian stock market. Comparative Political Studies 38 (10):12451270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S (2013) Globalization and Austerity Politics in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S and Thomsson, K (2016) The political economy of sovereign borrowing: explaining the choices of highly indebted countries. Journal of Politics 79 (2):605623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, CP (1978) Manias, Panics, and Crashes. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzer, P (1993) Business and Banking: Political Change and Economic Integration in Western Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lall, R (2016) How multiple imputation makes a difference. Political Analysis 24 (4):414433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblang, D and Satyanath, S (2006) Institutions, expectations, and currency crises. International Organization 60 (1):245262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, F, Pan, J, Pedersen, LH and Singleton, KJ (2011) How sovereign is sovereign credit risk? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3 (2):75103.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B, Chu, J and Min, E (2013) Autocracies of the world, 1950-2012 (Version 1.0). Stanford University, Dataset.Google Scholar
Maxfield, S (1997) Gatekeepers of Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McMenamin, I, Breen, M and Muoz-Portillo, J (2016) Comparative politics and quasi-rational markets. New Political Economy 21 (6):587605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melecky, M (2007) A cross-country analysis of public debt management strategies. Washington, DC: World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minsky, H (1977) A theory of systemic fragility. In Altman, Edward and Sametz, Arnold (eds), Financial Crises: Institutions and Markets in a Fragile Environment, pp. 138152. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Miranda-Agrippino, S and Rey, H (2015) World asset markets and the global financial cycle. Technical Report, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Missale, A (2000) Public Debt Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mosley, L (2003) Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nieto-Parra, S (2009) Who saw sovereign debt crises coming? Economa 10 (1):125169.Google Scholar
North, DC and Weingast, BR (1989) Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History 49 (4):803832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oatley, T (2011) The reductionist gamble: open economy politics in the global economy. International Organization 65 (2):311341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, J and Singleton, K (2008) Default and recovery implicit in the term structure of sovereign CDS spreads. Journal of Finance 63 (5):23452384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandya, S (2014) Foreign Direct Investment Regulation, 1970-2000. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A and Wallerstein, M (1988) Structural dependence of the state on capital. American Political Science Review 82 (1):1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajan, RG (2011) Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, C and Dias, DA (2009) Duration of capital market exclusion: an empirical investigation. Working paper, http://http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1027844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeh, T and Porath, Y (n.d.) Do the IMF and World Bank promote autonomous sovereign debt management? Working paper presented at the Political Economy of International Organizations conference, 2017. Bern, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Saiegh, S (2005) Do countries have a “Democratic advantage”? Political institutions, multilateral agencies, and sovereign borrowing. Comparative Political Studies 38 (4):366387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, KA and Weingast, BR (2003) The democratic advantage: institutional foundations of financial power in international competition. International Organization 57 (1):342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shambaugh, J (2004) The effect of fixed exchange rates on monetary policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1):301352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, BA (1994) Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy during the Interwar Years. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanakos, AP and Renno, LR (2009) Speak clearly and carry a big stock of dollar reserves: sovereign risk, ideology, and presidential elections in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and Venezuela. Comparative Political Studies 42 (1):12921316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasavage, D (2011) States of Credit: Size, Power and the Development of European Polities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strange, S (1998) Mad Money: When Markets Outgrow Governments. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M (2004) Voter sophistication and domestic preferences regarding debt default. Unpublished Working Paper. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
Tomz, M (2007) Reputation and International Cooperation: Sovereign Debt across Three Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, M and Wright, MLJ (2013) Empirical research on sovereign debt and default. Annual Review of Economics 5, 247272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valencia, F and Laeven, L (2012) Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update. International Monetary Fund. Working Paper No. 12/163. ISBN/ISSN: 9781475505054/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidemaier, M and Gulati, M (2017) International Finance and Sovereign Debt. In Parisi, Francesco (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 3: Public Law and Legal Institutions, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199684250.013.035.Google Scholar
Wellhausen, R (2015) Bondholders v. direct investors? Competing responses to expropriation. International Studies Quarterly 59 (4):750764.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Ballard-Rosa et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Ballard-Rosa et al. supplementary material

Ballard-Rosa et al. supplementary material

Download Ballard-Rosa et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 203.4 KB