Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:04:26.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Addressing a continuum of recovery after acquired brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1998

THOMAS A. NOVACK
Affiliation:
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
BRICK JOHNSTONE
Affiliation:
Brick Johnstone, University of Missouri, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbia, MO 56212, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In their dialogue published in JINS, Wilson (1997) and Prigatano (1997) have eloquently and concisely presented the challenges facing neuropsychology with respect to cognitive rehabilitation. However, both authors neglect two important issues that must be addressed if people with cognitive disorders are to be effectively treated. First, cognitive impairment must be treated during the acute stages of recovery; as to ignore cognitive deficits until patients are more fully recovered may bypass an opportune time for intervention. Evidence is mounting that the injured brain adapts to the losses sustained and that the adaptation will be enhanced by increasing interaction with the environment, as compared to more passive states (Johansson & Ohlsson, 1996; Stein et al., 1995). Given such information, it is difficult to justify withholding cognitive stimulation and remediation from people during acute stages of recovery and instead awaiting a point when spontaneous recovery (presumably) will be complete.

Type
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Copyright
© 1998 The International Neuropsychological Society