Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:10:40.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A theory of prediction in simultaneous interpreting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2019

Rhona M. Amos Open the ORCID record for Rhona M. Amos [Opens in a new window]  and
Martin J. Pickering
Rhona M. Amos*
Affiliation:
University of Geneva
Martin J. Pickering
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
*
Author for correspondence: Rhona M. Amos, E-mail: Rhona.Amos@unige.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

People make comprehension easier by predicting upcoming language. We might therefore expect prediction to occur during the extremely difficult task of simultaneous interpreting. This paper examines the theoretical and empirical foundations of this premise. It reviews accounts of prediction during comprehension in both monolinguals and bilinguals, and discusses these theories in light of experimental data (e.g., using the visual-world paradigm). It considers how these accounts may be applied to the unique and ecologically valid context of simultaneous interpreting, when two languages are used concurrently, one overtly engaging the comprehension system, and the other overtly engaging the production system. It then posits a role for the production system in prediction during comprehension and develops a theoretical framework for prediction-by-production in simultaneous interpreting that has implications for our understanding of prediction during language comprehension.

Keywords

predictionsimultaneous interpretingbilingualismcomprehensionproductionsource languagetarget language
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Special Issue 4: Interpreting: A window into bilingual processing , August 2020 , pp. 706 - 715
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adank, P (2012) The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses. Brain and Language 122, 42–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adank, P, Hagoort, P and Bekkering, H (2010) Imitation Improves Language Comprehension. Psychological Science 21, 1903–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610389192CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altmann, GTM and Kamide, Y (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, K and Levelt, WJM (1994) Language Production: Grammatical Encoding. In Gernsbacher, MA (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 945–984.Google Scholar
Boiteau, TW, Malone, PS, Peters, SA and Almor, A (2014) Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 295–311. doi: 10.1037/a0031858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernov, GV (1994) Message Redundancy and Message Anticipation in Simultaneous Interpretation. In Lambert, S and Moser-Mercer, B (eds.), Bridging the gap: empirical research in simultaneous interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–155.Google Scholar
Christoffels, IK and De Groot, AMB (2009) Simultaneous Interpreting: A Cognitive Perspective. In Kroll, JF and De Groot, AMB (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 371–388.Google Scholar
Costa, A, Caramazza, A and Sebastian-Galles, N (2000) The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26, 1283–1296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1283Google ScholarPubMed
Costa, A, Pannunzi, M, Deco, G and Pickering, MJ (2017) Do Bilinguals Automatically Activate Their Native Language When They Are Not Using It? Cognitive Science 41, 1629–1644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12434CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bot, K (1992) A bilingual production model: Levelt's ‘Speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics 13, 1–24.Google Scholar
De Groot, AMB (2011) Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, GS and Chang, F (2014) The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 369, 20120394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLong, KA, Urbach, TP and Kutas, M (2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8, 1117–1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, T, Grainger, J and van Heuven, WJB (1999) Recognition of Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: The Neglected Role of Phonology. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 496–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T and van Heuven, WJB (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5, 175–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikker, S, Rabagliati, H and Pylkkänen, L (2009) Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex. Cognition 110, 293–321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, E and Corley, M (2015) Articulatory imaging implicates prediction during spoken language comprehension. Memory and Cognition 43, 1136–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0530-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federmeier, KD, Kutas, M and Schul, R (2010) Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension. Brain and Language 115, 149–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.07.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federmeier, KD, McLennan, DB, De Ochoa, E and Kutas, M (2002) The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence content information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults. An ERP study. Psychophysiology 39, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3920133Google Scholar
Ferreira, VS and Pashler, H (2002) Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28, 1187–1199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1187Google ScholarPubMed
Foucart, A, Martin, CD, Moreno, EM and Costa, A (2014) Can bilinguals see it coming? Word anticipation in L2 sentence reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40, 1461–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036756Google ScholarPubMed
Friesen, DC, Whitford, V, Titone, D and Jared, D (2019) The impact of individual differences on cross-language activation of meaning by phonology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition: 1–21https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000142Google Scholar
Frisson, S, Harvey, DR and Staub, A (2017) No prediction error cost in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 95, 200–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerver, D (1976) Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In Brislin, R (ed.), Translation: Applications and Research. New York: Gardner Press, pp. 165–207.Google Scholar
Gerver, D, Longley, P, Long, J and Lambert, S (1984) Selecting trainee conference interpreters: A preliminary study. Journal of Occupational Psychology 57, 17–31.10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00144.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gile, D (2009) Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training (Vol. 8). Amsterdam/Philidelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisoni, L, McCormick Miller, T and Pulvermüller, F (2017) Neural correlates of semantic prediction and resolution in sentence processing. The Journal of Neuroscience 37, 4848–4858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2800-16.2017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartsuiker, RJ, Pickering, MJ and Veltkamp, E (2004) Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15, 409–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatzidaki, A, Branigan, HP and Pickering, MJ (2011) Co-activation of syntax in bilingual language production. Cognitive Psychology 62, 123–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.10.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodzik, E and Williams, JN (2017) Predictive processes during simultaneous interpreting from German into English. Interpreting 19, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.19.1.01hodCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huettig, F (2015) Four central questions about prediction in language processing. Brain Research 1626, 118–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huettig, F and Guerra, E (2019) Effects of speech rate, preview time of visual context, and participant instructions reveal strong limits on prediction in language processing. Brain Research 1706, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.11.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huettig, F and Janse, E (2016) Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31, 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1047459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A, Corley, M and Pickering, MJ (2017) A cognitive load delays predictive eye movements similarly during L1 and L2 comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A, Corley, M, Pickering, MJ, Martin, AE and Nieuwland, MS (2016) Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 86, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, A, Pickering, MJ and Corley, M (2018) Investigating the time-course of phonological prediction in native and non-native speakers of English: A visual world eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 98, 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jared, D and Kroll, JF (2001) Do Bilinguals Activate Phonological Representations in One or Both of Their Languages When Naming Words? Journal of Memory and Language 44, 2–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kukona, A, Fang, S-Y, Aicher, KA, Chen, H and Magnuson, JS (2011) The time course of anticipatory constraint integration. Cognition 119, 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperberg, GR (2016) Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1130233CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuperberg, GR and Jaeger, TF (2016) What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31, 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazlo, S and Federmeier, KD (2009) A beautiful day in the neighbourhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language 61, 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, WJM, Roelofs, A and Meyer, AS (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 22, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mani, N and Huettig, F (2012) Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38, 843–847. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1111395Google ScholarPubMed
Marian, V and Spivey, M (2003) Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6, 97–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W (1973) Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies. Nature 244, 522–523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/244522a0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, CD, Branzi, FM and Bar, M (2018) Prediction is Production: The missing link between language production and comprehension. Scientific Reports 8, 1079. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19499-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, CD, Thierry, G, Kuipers, J-R, Boutonnet, B, Foucart, A and Costa, A (2013) Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 574–588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, J, Pivneva, I and Titone, D (2014) Individual differences in inhibitory control relate to bilingual spoken word processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17, 89–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metusalem, R, Kutas, M, Urbach, TP, Hare, M, McRae, K and Elman, JL (2012) Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 66, 545–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mishra, RK, Singh, N, Pandey, A and Huettig, F (2012) Spoken language-mediated anticipatory eye-movements are modulated by reading ability - Evidence from Indian low and high literates. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.5.1.3Google Scholar
Moser, B (1978) Simultaneous interpretation: A hypothetical model and its practical application. In Gerver, D and Sinaiko, HW (eds.), Language, Interpretation and Communication. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 353–368.Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, B, Frauenfelder, UH, Casado, B and Künzli, A (2000) Searching to Define Expertise in Interpreting. In Dimitrova, BE and Hyltenstam, K (eds.), Language Processing and Simultaneous Interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 107–133.Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M, Politzer-Ahles, S, Heyselaar, E, Segaert, K, Darley, E, Kazanina, N, Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S, Bartolozzi, F, Kogan, V, Ito, A, Mézière, D, Barr, DJ, Rousselet, G, Ferguson, HJ, Busch-Moreno, S, Fu, X, Tuomainen, J, Kulakova E, Husband, M, Donaldson, DI, Kohút, Z, Rueschemeyer, S-A and Huettig, F (2017) Limits on prediction in language comprehension: A multi-lab failure to replicate evidence for probabilistic pre-activation of phonology. bioRxiv 111807. https://doi.org/10.1101/111807Google Scholar
Otten, M, Nieuwland, MS and Van Berkum, JJ (2007) Great expectations: specific lexical anticipation influences the processing of spoken language. BMC Neuroscience 8, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otten, M and Van Berkum, JJA (2008) Discourse-Based Word Anticipation During Language Processing: Prediction or Priming? Discourse Processes 45, 464–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638530802356463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, MJ and Gambi, C (2018) Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review. Psychological Bulletin 144, 1002–1044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, MJ and Garrod, S (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, MJ and Garrod, S (2013) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rommers, J, Meyer, AS, Praamstra, P and Huettig, F (2013) The contents of predictions in sentence comprehension: Activation of the shape of objects before they are referred to. Neuropsychologica 51, 437–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.12.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seeber, KG (2001) Intonation and anticipation in simultaneous interpreting. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 23, 61–97.Google Scholar
Seeber, KG (2011) Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting: Existing theories — new models. Interpreting 13, 176–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N and Hulstijn, JH (2009) Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. In Kroll, JF and De Groot, AMB (eds.), Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 371–388.Google Scholar
Seleskovitch, D (1984) Les anticipations de la compréhension. In Seleskovitch, D and Lederer, M (eds.), Interpréter pour traduire. France: Didier Erudition, pp. 273–283.Google Scholar
Setton, R (1999) Simultaneous Interpretation: A cognitive-pragmatic analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setton, R (2005) Pointing to contexts: A relevance-theoretic approach to assessing quality and difficulty in interpreting. In Gerzymisch-Arbogast, H and Van Dam, H (eds.), Knowledge Systems and Translation pp. 275–312. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sjerps, MJ and Meyer, AS (2015) Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition 136, 304–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staub, A, Grant, M, Astheimer, L and Cohen, A (2015) The influence of cloze probability and item constraint on cloze task response time. Journal of Memory and Language 82, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinney, DA (1979) Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, MK, Spivey-Knowlton, MJ, Eberhard, KM and Sedivy, JC (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 1632–1634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7777863CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thierry, G and Wu, YJ (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 12530–12535. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Berkum, JJ, Brown, CM, Zwitserlood, P, Kooijman, V and Hagoort, P (2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, 443–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443Google ScholarPubMed
Van Besien, F (1999) Anticipation in simultaneous interpretation. Meta 44, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.7202/004532arCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wicha, NYY, Moreno, EM and Kutas, M (2004) Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16, 1272–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041920487CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilss, W (1978) Syntactic Anticipation in German-English Simultaneous Interpreting. In Gerver, D and Sinaiko, HW (eds.), Language interpretation and communication. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar