Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T22:57:39.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bilingualism as a desirable difficulty: Advantages in word learning depend on regulation of the dominant language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2018

CARI A. BOGULSKI ,
KINSEY BICE  and
JUDITH F. KROLL
CARI A. BOGULSKI
Affiliation:
Center for Language Science, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University
KINSEY BICE
Affiliation:
Center for Language Science, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside
JUDITH F. KROLL*
Affiliation:
Center for Language Science, Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside
*
Address for correspondence: Judith Kroll, Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521judith.kroll@ucr.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bilingualism imposes costs to language processing but benefits to word learning. We test a new hypothesis that relates costs in language processing at study to benefits in learning at test as desirable difficulties. While previous studies have taught vocabulary via bilinguals’ native language (L1), recent evidence suggests that bilinguals acquire regulatory skill in the L1 to coordinate the use of each language. We hypothesized that L1 regulation underlies the observed costs and benefits, with word learning advantages depending on learning via the L1. Four groups learned novel Dutch words via English translations: English monolinguals, and English–Spanish, Spanish–English, and Chinese–English bilinguals. Only English–Spanish bilinguals demonstrated a word learning advantage, but they adopted a costly study strategy compared to monolinguals. The results suggest that bilingual advantages in vocabulary learning depend on learning via the L1 or dominant language because learning via the L1 allows bilinguals to engage regulatory skills that benefit learning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 5 , November 2019 , pp. 1052 - 1067
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The writing of this paper was supported in part by NIH Grant HD082796 and NSF Grants BCS-1535124 and OISE-1545900 to J.F. Kroll. C.A. Bogulski was supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship. K. Bice was supported by the William Orr Dingwall Foundation Neurolinguistics Fellowship and by an NSF Dissertation Enhancement Award, BCS-1551892. The data reported here were initially collected as part of a master's thesis conducted at Penn State University by C.A. Bogulski, under the direction of J.F. Kroll. We thank Katie Juza, Anne Marie Toccket, Mark Minnick, Jason Gullifer, Joyce Tam, Tracey Chen, Eileen Tsai, Shara Gress for assistance with data coding and data collection. We also thank Natsuki Atagi and Emily Mech for comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

References

Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2001). The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890100027XGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (online).Google Scholar
Bak, T. H., Vega-Mendoza, M., & Sorace, A. (2014). Never too late? An advantage on tests of auditory attention extends to late bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00485Google Scholar
Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). On the effects of second language immersion on first language production. Acta Psychologica, 142, 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.01.010Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual Minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387084Google Scholar
Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In Gernsbacher, M. A. and Pomerantz, J. (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (2nd edition). (pp. 59–68). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–44. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823Google Scholar
Bjork, R. A., & Kroll, J. F. (2015). Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning. The American Journal of Psychology, 128, 241–252.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2013). Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus–Stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 80, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000564Google Scholar
Bradley, K. A. L., King, K. E., & Hernandez, A. E. (2013). Language experience differentiates prefrontal and subcortical activation of the cognitive control network in novel word learning. NeuroImage, 67, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.018Google Scholar
Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 106–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010Google Scholar
Calabria, M., Hernández, M., Branzi, F. M., & Costa, A. (2012). Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: Evidence from task-switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00399Google Scholar
Costa, A., Pannunzi, M., Deco, G., & Pickering, M. J. (2017). Do bilinguals automatically activate their native language when they are not using it?. Cognitive Science. 10.1111/cogs.12434Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491–511.Google Scholar
Degani, T., Tseng, A. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Together or apart: Learning of translation-ambiguous words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 749–765.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 397–428.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Luk, G., Pyers, J. E., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals: Evidence from bimodal bilinguals. Psychological Science, 19, 1201–1206.Google Scholar
Francis, W. S., & Baca, Y. (2014). Effects of language dominance on item and order memory in free recall, serial recall and order reconstruction. Memory, 22, 1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.866253Google Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: a latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101Google Scholar
Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377Google Scholar
Grundy, J. G., & Timmer, K. (2016). Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316678286Google Scholar
Guo, T., Liu, H., Misra, M., & Kroll, J.F. (2011). Local and global inhibition in bilingual word production: fMRI evidence from Chinese–English bilinguals. NeuroImage, 56, 2300–2309. https://doi.org/10.1016/Google Scholar
Hirosh, Z., & Degani, T. (2017). Direct and indirect effects of multilingualism on novel language learning: An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–25.Google Scholar
Honey, C. J., Thompson, C. R., Lerner, Y., & Hasson, U. (2012). Not lost in translation: neural responses shared across languages. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32, 15277–83. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1800-12.2012Google Scholar
Hoshino, N., & Kroll, J. F. (2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition, 106, 501–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.001Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009a). Bilingualism reduces native-language interference during novel-word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015275Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009b). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 705–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.705Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Rechtzigel, K. (2012). Concreteness effects in bilingual and monolingual word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 935–41. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0271-5Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., Yoo, J., & Van Hecke, S. (2013). Word Learning in Adults With Second-Language Experience: Effects of Phonological and Referent Familiarity. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0084)JoumalGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2015). Bilingualism, Mind, and Brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124937Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bogulski, C. A., & Valdés Kroff, J. R. (2012). Juggling two languages in one mind: What bilinguals tell us about language processing and its consequences for cognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 229–262.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Gollan, T. H. (2014). Speech planning in two languages: What bilinguals tell us about language production. In Ferreira, V., Goldrick, M., & Miozzo, M. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Production (pp. 165–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18, 137–171. https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr201oaGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category Interference in Translation and Picture Naming: Evidence for Asymmetric Connections between Bilingual Memory Representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174.Google Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20, 1507–1515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.xGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 861–83. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual Language Switching in Naming: Asymmetrical Costs of Language Selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25–40.Google Scholar
Misra, M., Guo, T., Bobb, S. C., & Kroll, J. F. (2012). When bilinguals choose a single word to speak: Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 67, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.05.001Google Scholar
Nair, V. K., Biedermann, B., & Nickels, L. (2016). Consequences of late bilingualism for novel word learning: Evidence from Tamil–English bilingual speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914567005Google Scholar
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401378Google Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good Language-Switchers are Good Task-Switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English Bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000580Google Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). The elusive link between language control and executive control: A case of limited transfer. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 622–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.821993Google Scholar
Sandoval, T. C., Gollan, T. H., Ferreira, V. S., & Salmon, D. P. (2010). What causes the bilingual disadvantage in verbal fluency? The dual-task analogy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990514Google Scholar
Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (2002). What Is Learned under Difficult Conditions Is Hard to Forget: Contextual Interference Effects in Foreign Vocabulary Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2813Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.) (2016). Digging into dominance: A closer look at language dominance in bilinguals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020586Google Scholar
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 12530–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104Google Scholar
Tseng, A. M., Eddington, C. M., Phillips, J. S., & Tokowicz, N. (2012). Far transfer from adaptive cognitive training to L2 vocabulary learning. In The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar
Valian, V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000522Google Scholar
Van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). Whole-language and item-specific control in bilingual language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 1781–1792. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032859Google Scholar
Van Hell, J. G., & Mahn, A. C. (1997). Keyword mnemonics versus rote rehearsal: Learning concrete and abstract foreign words by experienced and inexperienced learners. Language Learning, 47, 507–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00018Google Scholar
Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Pseudo: A nonword/pseudoword generator. NICI, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Vega-Mendoza, M., West, H., Sorace, A., & Bak, T. H. (2015). The impact of late, non-balanced bilingualism on cognitive performance. Cognition, 137, 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.12.008Google Scholar
Weissberger, G. H., Wierenga, C. E., Bondi, M. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2012). Partially overlapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology and Aging, 27, 959–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028281Google Scholar
Xu, M., Baldauf, D., Chang, C. Q., Desimone, R., & Tan, L. H. (2017). Distinct distributed patterns of neural activity are associated with two languages in the bilingual brain. Science Advances, 3 (7), e1603309.Google Scholar
Zirnstein, M., Van Hell, J. G., & Kroll, J. F. (2018). Cognitive control ability mediates prediction costs in monolinguals and bilinguals. Cognition, 176, 87–106.Google Scholar