Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:21:12.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TBLT AND L2 PRONUNCIATION

DO THE BENEFITS OF TASKS EXTEND BEYOND GRAMMAR AND LEXIS?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Laura Gurzynski-Weiss ,
Avizia Yim Long  and
Megan Solon
Laura Gurzynski-Weiss*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Avizia Yim Long
Affiliation:
University of Guam
Megan Solon
Affiliation:
University at Albany, SUNY
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Laura Gurzynski-Weiss, Department of Spanish and Portuguese, GISB 2127W, Indiana University, 355 North Jordan Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405. E-mail: lgurzyns@indiana.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction to the Special Issue
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 39 , Special Issue 2: TBLT and L2 Pronunciation: Do the Benefits of Tasks Extend Beyond Grammar and Lexis? , June 2017 , pp. 213 - 224
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aliaga-García, C., & Mora, J. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In Watkins, M. A., Rauber, A. S., & Baptista, B. O. (Eds.), Recent research in second language phonetics/phonology (pp. 2–31). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Arroyo Hernández, I. (2009). Tension and quantity in phonetic correction with Italian speakers: A proposal for the Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 59–75.Google Scholar
Baralt, M. (2014). Task complexity and task sequencing in traditional versus online language classes. In Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P. (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 95–122). London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P. (Eds.). (2014). Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London, UK: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). The effects of task type and classroom environment on learners’ engagement with the language. In Sato, M. & Ballinger, S. (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–239). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Available at http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
de la Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ridder, I., Vangehuchten, L., & Seseña Gómez, M. (2007). Enhancing automaticity through task-based language learning. Applied Linguistics, 28, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, A. R. (1995). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 79, 356–371.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. R. (1997). On the teaching and acquisition of pronunciation within a communicative approach. Hispania, 801, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Baskturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Learning uptake in communicative ESL lessons. Language Learning, 51, 281–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilabert, R., & Barón, J. (2013). The impact of increasing task complexity on L2 pragmatic moves. In Mackey, A. & McDonough, K. (Eds.), Second language interaction in diverse educational settings (pp. 45–69). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
González-Bueno, M. (1997). The effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of Spanish stop consonants. In Glass, W. & Pérez-Leroux, A. T. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish. Volume 2: Production, processing, and comprehension (pp. 57–75). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M. (2014). Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in FTF and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1–37.Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M. (2015). A closer look at learner responses to feedback and their effect on noticing in face-to-face and computer-mediated task-based interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1393–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerly, H. (1982). Contrastive phonology and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 201, 17–32.Google Scholar
Hansen Edwards, J. G., & Zampini, M. L. (2008). Introduction. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy and fluency. Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. O., & Burch, A. R. (Eds.). (2017). Complementary perspectives on task-based classroom realities [Special issue]. TESOL Quarterly, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The Cognition Hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63, 330–367.Google Scholar
Kennedy, S., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Intelligibility, comprehensibility, and accentedness of L2 speech: The role of listener experience and semantic context. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner–learner interaction. System, 37, 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2008). The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promoting task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 99, 656–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2013). The role of task repetition in L2 performance development: What needs to be repeated during task-based interaction? System, 41, 829–840.Google Scholar
Kissling, E. M. (2013). Teaching pronunciation: Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners? Modern Language Journal, 97, 720–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 102–120.Google Scholar
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36, 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (1998). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa’s (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2001). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51 (Suppl. 1), 113–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2014). Instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. & Pienemann, M. (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1998). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. University of Hawai’i Working Papers in ESL, 16, 35–49.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., & Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language teaching (pp. 597–603). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lord, G. (2005). (How) can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 88, 557–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, G. (2008). Podcasting communities and second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, G. (2010). The combined effects of immersion and instruction on second language pronunciation. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 488–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, D., Yule, G., & Powers, M. (1994). Attempts to improve English L2 pronunciation: The variable effects of different types of instruction. Language Learning, 44, 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missaglia, F. (1999). Contrastive prosody in SLA: An empirical study with adult Italian learners of German. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1, 551–554.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, J. (2013). Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 17, 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuevo, A. M., Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task complexity, modified output, and L2 development in learner–learner interaction. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 175–202). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. J. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., & Han, Z. H. (2015). Task content familiarity, task type and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15, 160–179.Google Scholar
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2014). The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45–105.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2011). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P., & Gilabert, R. (2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis and second language learning and performance. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Sabater, S. (2005). Utilizing undergraduate peer teaching assistants in a speaking program in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K. (2012). Effects of instruction on L2 pronunciation development: A synthesis of 15 quasi-experimental intervention studies. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 842–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, K. (2013). Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 1–29.Google Scholar
Saito, K. (2015). Variables affecting the effects of recasts on L2 pronunciation development. Language Teaching Research, 19, 276–300.Google Scholar
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62, 595–633.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A., & Coombe, C. A. (Eds.). (2012). Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (Ed.). (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Kim, Y. (Eds.). (in press). Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203.Google Scholar
Tonkyn, A. (2012). Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency: Examining instructed learners’ short-term gains. In Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 221–246). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Gatbonton, E. (2006). Repetition and focus on form in processing L2 Spanish words: Implications for pronunciation instruction. Modern Language Journal, 90, 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J. M. (Eds.). (2009). Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zampini, M. L. (1998). The relationship between the production and perception of L2 Spanish stops. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 3, 85–100.Google Scholar