Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:12:25.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Citizen Reasoning within Counterfactual Democratic Institutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2019

Kevin M. Esterling*
Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Reflections on The Democratic Dilemma
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Broockman, David, and Kalla, Joshua. 2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, ed. Hamlin, Alan and Petit, Phillip, 6792. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1905. “Philosophy and American National Life.” In Centennial Anniversary of the Graduation of the First Class, July Third to Seventh, 1904, 106–13. Burlington: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
Esterling, Kevin M., Neblo, Michael A., and Lazer, David M. J.. 2011. “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment Involving Members of Congress and Their Constituents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (Fall): 483503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 2018. Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2012. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1973. “Counterfactuals and Comparative Possibility.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4): 418–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neblo, Michael A. 2015. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan, Lazer, David, and Sokhey, Anand. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate—and Why?American Political Science Review 104 (3): 566–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David M. J.. 2018. Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Minozzi, William, Esterling, Kevin M., Green, Jon, Kingzette, Jonathon, and Lazer, David M. J.. 2017. “The Need for a Translational Science of Democracy.” Science 355 (6328): 914–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1988. Liberals against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Lynn M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1981. “Structure-Induced Equilibrium and Legislative Choice.” Public Choice 37: 503–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar