Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:33:47.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterisation, axial anisotropy, and formation conditions of celestine minerals from the Jabal Eghei (Nuqay) late Neogene – Pleistocene volcanic province, southeastern edge of the Sirt Basin, southern Libya: Constraints on the mineralogical geothermometer – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2024

Pavle Tančić Open the ORCID record for Pavle Tančić [Opens in a new window] ,
Maja Milošević Open the ORCID record for Maja Milošević [Opens in a new window] ,
Darko Spahić Open the ORCID record for Darko Spahić [Opens in a new window] ,
Bojan Kostić Open the ORCID record for Bojan Kostić [Opens in a new window] ,
Aleksandar Kremenović Open the ORCID record for Aleksandar Kremenović [Opens in a new window] ,
Maja Poznanović-Spahić Open the ORCID record for Maja Poznanović-Spahić [Opens in a new window]  and
Jovan Kovačević
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

celestinecharacterisationaxial anisotropyformation conditionsJabal Eghei (Nuqay) volcanic provincesouthern Libyaerratum
Type
Erratum
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , April 2024 , pp. 210
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland

The publisher apologies for an error introduced during production in the section of text on p. 10 under the heading “(v) The option that various structural variations within the samples could take place”, in paragraph six.

The published text reads:

“For possibility (b), the major celestines with the disregarded gypsum or anhydrite phases, the results in Supplementary Tables S10 and S16 demonstrate that there is a slightly different ratio between various crystallographic axes, such as c 0 < a 0 <b 0 (samples 1 and 4), a 0 < c 0 <b 0 (samples 2 and 3) and a 0 = c 0 < b 0 (sample 5).”

The text ‘possibility (b)’ should be changed to ‘possibility 2’, and hence the descriptor ‘the major celestines with the disregarded gypsum or anhydrite phases’ should be removed.

The correct text is:

“For possibility (2), the results in Supplementary Tables S10 and S16 demonstrate that there is a slightly different ratio between various crystallographic axes, such as c 0 < a 0 <b 0 (samples 1 and 4), a 0 < c 0 <b 0 (samples 2 and 3) and a 0 = c 0 < b 0 (sample 5).”

References

Tančić, P., Milošević, M., Spahić, D., Kostić, B., Kremenović, A., Poznanović-Spahić, M. and Kovačević, J. (2024) Characterisation, axial anisotropy, and formation conditions of celestine minerals from the Jabal Eghei (Nuqay) late Neogene – Pleistocene volcanic province, southeastern edge of the Sirt Basin, southern Libya: Constraints on the mineralogical geothermometer. Mineralogical Magazine, 88, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2023.88CrossRefGoogle Scholar