Study region

The test site, located in the southern Oetztal Alps (Fig. 1), is 17km by 15 km in area (centered at 46.88 N, 10.838 E), and includes three glaciers with long-term mass-balance measurements: Vernagt-, Kesselwand- and Hintereisferner (measurement started in 1965, 1953 and 1953, respectively). The region is somewhat shaded from precipitation, and climate conditions are thus more continental than in most other parts of the Alps. According to the precipitation map from Reference SchulerSchwarb and others (2001), an annual amount of 1 m is found at 2600 ma.s.l. in the Vernagtferner catchment (mean value for the 1971–90 period). In this respect, the steady-state equilibrium-line altitudes (ELA₀) are comparably high: 2980–3120ma.s.l. for the three above-mentioned glaciers (Haeberli and others, 2001). Although the focus here is on the mass-balance distribution of Vernagtferner (8.5km², 2765–3627ma.s.l.), the results obtained for the other two glaciers and the entire study region are also analyzed.

Fig. 1. Location of the test site in the Alps (inset) and model domain of this study in the southern Oetztal Alps as seen on a Landsat Thematic Mapper panchromatic image from 13 September 1999. Letters on the image denote glacier names: G, Gepatschferner; H, Hintereisferner; J, Hochjochferner; K, Kesselwandferner; R, Rofenkarferner; V, Vernagtferner; W, Weißseeferner.

The mass balance is calculated for the 1997/98 and 1998/99 balance years because they were rather different (strongly negative and close to zero, respectively) and because glacier outlines and a DEM from 1999 are available for the model domain. The mass balance is measured using the fixed-date system (1 October to 30 September) and the same time period is used for the modeling in both years. The meteorological variables are measured near the gauging station Vernagtbach (2640ma.s.l.), which is about 1 km downstream from the terminus of the glacier. Most parts of Vernagtferner face to the east, south, or southwest (Fig. 1), and topographic shading plays only a minor role during summer (Reference Reijmer and HockReinwarth and Escher-Vetter, 1999).

Topography and glacier outlines

The topography of the model domain is given by a DEM with 25 m grid spacing (680×600 cells) from swisstopo that has been interpolated from contour lines of a 1 : 50 000 map compiled in about 1985. As most glaciers have decreased strongly in elevation since 1985 (in particular near the terminus), elevations have been updated with the SRTM3 (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission 3) DEM from 1999 (e.g. Farr and others, 2007). In the case of a lowered glacier surface, the elevations inside the 1985 glacier extent are replaced in the DEM with values from 1999. Glacier outlines from 1985 and 1999 have been derived automatically from multispectral classification of Landsat satellite data, with manual corrections in a few regions with thick debris cover (Reference OerlemansPaul, 2002). The derived outlines from 1999 for Vernagtferner agree very well with those used to calculate the mass balance (Reference Klok and OerlemansKommission für Glaziologie, 2001). Moreover, the area–elevation distribution of the glacier from the updated DEM is (except for a slightly larger region between 3400 and 3500 m) nearly identical with that used for the field measurements. For comparison with the modeled snowline, the study region is illustrated in Figure 1 with the panchromatic band from the Landsat scene acquired on 13 September 1999.

Daily meteorological variables

The model is forced with daily means of temperature (T) and global radiation (R), and with daily sums of precipitation (P) as measured near the gauging station Vernagtbach. The time series of all three parameters are shown in Figure 2. In the case of T and R they were aggregated from hourly mean values as stored by a Modas data logger with a scan rate of 2 s. The daily sums of P are obtained from paper charts with monthly records derived from a Belfort weighing rain gauge. Although this tool provides reliable precipitation amounts in summer, the data acquisition in winter is, in part, questionable, due to burying under the snow, wind drift into and out of the gauge, and the possible malfunction of the device during unattended operation. The measured day-to-day variability of pressure and relative humidity was not included in the calculation of the energy balance, as the variability has only a limited influence on the mass balance (Reference OerlemansOerlemans, 2001). However, we used the measured annual mean values as a base for calculating their elevation and temperature-dependent variability. Wind speed and direction were also measured, but were not used in this study because the calculation of the turbulent heat fluxes does not include wind speed; snow redistribution by wind was also not considered.

Fig. 2. Time series of measured mean daily global radiation (a), temperature (b) and precipitation sums (c) for the balance years 1997/98 and 1998/99. All values are original data from the climate station at the Vernagtbach gauging station (2640ma.s.l.).

Meteorological variables in a grid format

The spatial distribution of T, P and R as measured near the run-off gauge follows three different approaches (Reference Paul, Kotlarski and HoelzlePaul and others, 2008): Temperature depends on elevation only and is calculated for each DEM cell from the measured value T and a standard atmospheric lapse rate of –0.0065°Cm^–1. We acknowledge that the lapse rate is not constant during a year (often much lower in winter), but for the calculation of glacier mass balance in this climatic zone the summer lapse rate is more important. Precipitation for each gridcell is obtained by multiplying the measured daily sum P with a resampled and normalized grid from the Reference SchulerSchwarb and others (2001) climatology. The resampling from the original 2 km resolution to the 25 m cells of the DEM uses bilinear interpolation. The normalization procedure divides all values of the climatology by the annual sum at the location of the gauging station (1040 mm). The measured annual sums at the gauging station (876mm in 1997/98 and 989mm in 1998/99) are 5–15% smaller than in the climatology. To account for the systematic undercatch by precipitation gauges of solid precipitation, all gridcells are multiplied by a factor of 1.2 (a 20% increase), as recommended by Reference FarrFrei and Schär (1998). The precipitation distribution before normalization is illustrated in Figure 3a. Apart from a general increase in precipitation with elevation, several local deviations of this rule are visible. These reflect the influence of the topography considered during the interpolation of the Reference SchulerSchwarb and others (2001) dataset. The range of annual precipitation sums over glaciers varies between 910 and 1270 mm.

Fig. 3. Examples of grid input datasets as applied to the entire model domain. Black lines indicate glacier extent in 1999 as derived from a Landsat Thematic Mapper scene. (a) Spatial distribution of the mean climatologic (1971–90) annual precipitation sum from Reference SchulerSchwarb and others (2001) after bilinear interpolation to 25 m. (b) Mean potential global radiation for Julian day 212 (1 August) as modeled with the SRAD code. In part, the DEM25 from swisstopo has been used for the modeling.

The mean daily potential (clear-sky) global radiation is calculated beforehand for each day of the year and for each cell of the DEM by the solar radiation model SRAD (Reference Schwarb, Daly, Frei and SchärWilson and Gallant, 2000). SRAD fully accounts for all topographic effects (e.g. slope, aspect, shading, sky-view factor) and is of a higher quality than other models (Reference GruberHeggem and others, 2001). Set against the measured global radiation R, the values from SRAD form an envelope enclosing the measured maximum values. The measured mean daily global radiation R is then used to calculate a mean daily cloud factor (R divided by the potential radiation), which is used for the entire model domain. Figure 3b shows the modeled global radiation at Julian day 212 (1 August). High amounts of global radiation are received on flat surfaces, more or less independent of their aspect (the steeper the slope the more important the aspect becomes). In a high-mountain environment, such flat regions are found in the accumulation areas of glaciers. Hence, mass-balance profiles might be subject to large changes as soon as the snow in the accumulation region of these glaciers is replaced by (much darker) firn or bare ice (Reference PaulPaul and others, 2005).

The distributed glacier mass-balance model

The mass-balance model is based on the assumption that the most important variables (potential global radiation, temperature, precipitation) are determined accurately whereas others are treated more roughly or kept constant at their climatologic or measured mean values for the respective year. In general, this approach leads to very good results, as much of the mass-balance variability is determined by these three variables (Reference OerlemansOerlemans, 2001; Reference Heggem, Etzelmüller and BerthlingHock, 2005). Melt of snow or ice occurs in the model when the energy balance is positive; a possible ground-heat flux and the energy provided by refreezing of water are neglected in the model. The model run started at Julian day 270 (29 September) of the respective year with a snow-free surface (using the ice albedo throughout) and calculates mass balance for each cell of the DEM at daily steps until day 269 in the following year. More details of the modeling approach are described by Reference Paul, Kotlarski and HoelzlePaul and others (2008). The model was validated with ablation stake measurements and compared with the mass balance profiles of two glaciers in the Swiss Alps; this comparison indicated an encouraging agreement (Machguth and others, 2006a). The physics of the model is to a large extent based on the parameterizations given by Reference Kaser, Fountain and JanssonKlok and Oerlemans (2002), and we thus focus here on the description of the applied modifications and selected parameters.

Our version of the model has been adapted to run with a priori calculated grid datasets (e.g. mean daily potential global radiation) and is less complex because it uses daily time-steps. The two most important differences between the model physics and the Reference Kaser, Fountain and JanssonKlok and Oerlemans (2002) model are: (1) a single surface layer with a constant 0° temperature for the entire glacier throughout the year; and (2) a less complex calculation of the turbulent fluxes, which is adapted from Reference OerlemansOerlemans (1992). The single surface layer precludes consideration of the penetration of a winter cold wave into the snowpack. This results in an earlier meltout of the bare ice by a few days, but has little impact on the annual mass balance (Reference Gerbaux, Genthon, Etchevers, Vincent and DedieuGreuell and Oerlemans, 1986). The use of a 0°C surface temperature resulted in a much higher emission of longwave radiation during winter, but this had no impact on the modeled mass balance because the energy balance remains negative during winter (Reference OerlemansOerlemans, 1992). The bulk approach used to calculate the turbulent fluxes lumps wind speed into the exchange coefficient but allows the latter to vary with distance from the ELA, so as to consider increased surface roughness down the glacier (Reference OerlemansOerlemans, 1992). In our opinion, this is a viable approach of calculating turbulent fluxes over entire glaciers from meteorological data measured at some distance from the glacier.

Fixed values have been used for cloud height (5000 m), snowfall threshold temperature (1.5°C), bare-ice albedo (0.3) and fresh-snow albedo (0.8). They reflect mean values from a larger possible range and are based on commonly used values and experience of the authors. Slightly different parameterizations are used for the calculation of cloud cover (following Reference Mittaz, Imhof, Hoelzle and HaeberliOerlemans, 1991) and atmospheric pressure (adapted from Reference Machguth, Eisen, Paul and HoelzleMittaz and others, 2002). The reduction of snow albedo by metamorphosis is included with an exponential aging function linked to the number of days since the last snowfall (>1mmw.e.) and whether temperature at the DEM cell is above or below 0°C (ECMWF, 2004). This resulted in variations of the snow albedo of 0.7–0.8 during winter. In the model, snow thickness is in mmw.e. and liquid precipitation does not contribute to mass balance.

Observed mass-balance distribution

The mass balance for Vernagtferner is determined in the field with the direct glaciological method (Reference Huss, Bauder, Funk and HockKaser and others, 2003). The areal distribution of specific net mass-balance values is derived from stake and pit measurements at about 50 sites, with most of the stakes placed in the lower part of the ablation area (WGMS, 2001). On the basis of the readings at the end of the glaciological year, the specific accumulation and ablation values at the sites are mapped, and isolines of specific water balance are drawn and integrated over 50m contour intervals. Reference Reijmer and HockReinwarth and Escher-Vetter (1999) give an example for 1978/79, a year with a near-zero mass balance for the entire glacier. As explained before, the mass balance as measured at the ablation stakes is not used for a direct comparison with the model results. Instead, the mass-balance distribution as reported in the maps of WGMS (2001) is used for better visibility in the colour-coded version as prepared for the internet (www.glaziolgie.de).

GIS-based calculations

A Geographic Information System (GIS) allows us to perform (statistical) calculations over large samples of number-coded entities like glaciers. The basic idea is to assign to each glacier a unique code representing a zone and to calculate statistical data for a ‘value’ grid (e.g. a DEM or the modeled mass balance) for each of the zones. In this way, mean mass balance is calculated for each of the selected glaciers. This implies that B _a (total annual balance) and S (total surface area) are not calculated explicitly for each elevation band, but only B _a/S or b _a (specific annual balance). As the hypsography for Vernagtferner from the updated 1999 DEM is nearly identical with that used for extrapolation of the field measurements, there are only small differences of the mean mass balance due to this deviation. In this study, the GIS is used for:

colour-coding the modeled mass-balance values as used for the maps of the measurements,

calculating mean mass-balance values for selected glaciers of the model domain, and

determining mean mass balance in 50 m elevation bands for the comparison of profiles.

Mass balance of Vernagtferner

The spatial distribution of the mass balance from the model and as measured in the field for the two balance years is depicted in Figure 4a–d. The colours used for the respective value ranges are about the same. The related mass-balance profiles are given in Figure 5. In the 1997/98 balance year, the modeled mass-balance distribution (Fig. 4a) shows an underestimation of mass loss near the terminus and an overestimation in the higher regions, in particular for the middle and eastern sections of the glacier. In the upper part of the western section, there is even a more positive balance than in the field interpretation (Fig. 4b). Integrated over the entire glacier, the mass-balance profile reveals this elevationdependent under- and overestimation clearly (Fig. 5). Both deviations together average out and the modeled mean mass balance (–1.06 m) is nearly identical to the field-derived value (–1.0 m). For the small north-facing part of the western tongue (‘Schwarzwandbereich’) there is also a reasonable agreement with the field-derived values, and in particular the pattern. The ELA correctly crosses an altitude range of about 400 m on the glacier, and the pattern around the three rock outcrops at the western side is also modeled correctly. Most obvious is the much more negative modeled mass balance for the region south of ‘Taschachjochbereich’.

Fig. 4. Comparison of modeled (a, c) and measured (b, d) mass-balance distribution for Vernagtferner in the balance years 1997/98 (a, b) and 1998/99 (c, d). The same colour legend is used for all images.

Fig. 5. Modeled and measured mass-balance profiles in the two balance years for Vernagtferner.

For the more positive balance year 1998/99, the overall agreement of the modeled (Fig. 4c) and the measured pattern (Fig. 4d) is much better. Again, the mass balance is more positive in the model near the glacier terminus. However, this time it is also more positive than measured at higher elevations for the Schwarzwand tongue and only slightly more negative for the other glacier parts. Although the model does not capture the high variability of the mass balance near the ELA (between green and cyan), the mean position of the ELA (visually averaged) is modeled very well. The good agreement is also reflected in the mass-balance profiles (Fig. 5), a nearly identical position of the ELA when averaged over the entire glacier (about 15 m higher in the model) and a nearly identical mean mass balance (–0.09 instead of –0.11mw.e.).

The comparison of the mass-balance profiles (Fig. 5) reveals some further points. In general, the mass-balance gradient for 1998/99 agrees much better with the measured gradient, in particular in the ablation region. In the 1997/98 balance year the modeled gradient is considerably smaller than the measured gradient (–0.6 instead of –1mw.e. (100 m)^–1. This implies that balance gradients (in the ablation area) are modeled better when the mean balance is close to equilibrium. Although accumulation is overestimated in the 1998/99 balance year above 3250 m, the absolute values agree fairly well in 1997/98. The overestimation in 1998/99 suggests processes of snow removal from steep slopes (Reference Greuell and OerlemansGruber, 2007) that are not considered in this model. In both cases, the mass balance is about 0.8 mw.e. more positive at the lowest elevations in the model. This is most likely due to a considerably lower albedo in this region than used in the model.

Mass balance in the entire study region

Figure 6a and b show the mass-balance distribution for the two balance years and the entire study site, using the same colour table as in Figure 4. At first glance, it seems that the model is also able to calculate realistic mass-balance distributions for the other glaciers. When considering the measured mass balance at Hintereis- and Kesselwandferner (Table 1), a very good agreement with the model result for Hintereisferner in 1997/98 and for Kesselwandferner in 1998/99 is found. In the other years, the mass balance is 0.3 mw.e. too positive for Kesselwandferner and 0.4mw.e. too negative for Hintereisferner (Table 1). This has two implications: (1) model tuning in any direction is rendered useless because it degrades the result for the other glacier at the same time; and (2) the reasons for the deviations are different in both cases.

Fig. 6. Mass-balance distribution as modeled for the entire study region in the years (a) 1997/98 and (b) 1998/99.

Table 1. Comparison of modeled and measured mass balance (in mw.e.) for three glaciers in the Ötztal Alps in the two balance years

Most remarkable is the more negative mass balance at the terminus of Gepatsch- and Hintereisferner (‘G’ and ‘H’ in Fig. 1) in the more positive balance year 1998/99. This phenomenon could be observed in the modeled mass-balance distribution for elevations below 2300 ma.s.l. With regard to the differences in the accumulation area when comparing the two mass-balance years, there is a large variability from glacier to glacier. Whereas a few glaciers increased their snow-covered region only slightly from 1997/98 to 1998/99 (e.g. Weißseeferner ‘W’ or Hochjochferner ‘J’ in Fig. 1), others changed more significantly (e.g. Gepatschferner ‘G’ or Vernagtferner ‘V’ in Fig. 1), or even became more or less completely snow-covered (e.g. Kesselwandferner ‘K’ or Rofenkarferner ‘R’ in Fig. 1). This indicates that the mass-balance sensitivity of the latter glaciers is higher than that of the other glaciers. Indeed, Kesselwand- and Rofenkarferner advanced strongly in the 1970s and 1980s (Reference KuhnKuhn and others, 1985).

Compared with the satellite image from 13 September 1999 (Fig. 1), the modeled snow-covered regions (with a mass balance > 0) for the 1998/99 balance year (Fig. 6b) are in close agreement for nearly all glaciers, including many of the smaller ones, and partly also when considering subtle details. When reference is made to the modeled spatial pattern instead of the absolute values, the agreement further improves. Local deviations could often be explained by snow avalanching from steep slopes, which is not considered in this model but could be an important source of accumulation or ablation for small glaciers (Kuhn, 1995).

Meteorological parameters

The differences of the climatic conditions in the two balance years should be able to explain a large part of the contrasting mass-balance conditions in both years. Whereas the sum of the measured (uncorrected) winter (November to March) precipitation is nearly identical in both years (204 and 211 mm, respectively), the mean values of summer (June to August) temperature and global radiation were 0.75°C and 15Wm^–2 higher in 1997/98 than in 1998/99. This might already explain a large part of the differences. To a certain extent, a heavy precipitation event (>50 mm) at the beginning of the 1998/99 balance year could have established an early snow cover with high albedo. The more negative mass balances below 2300m in 1998/99 might be related to this snowfall event, which reached down to this elevation (see Fig. 2), and the related feedbacks of albedo on the mass balance.

Precipitation and global radiation have been distributed in the model domain with a normalized grid of the mean climatic (period 1971–90) annual precipitation sum (Fig. 3a) and daily grids of mean clear-sky global radiation (Fig. 3b). A closer inspection of both datasets helps to explain the observed pattern of the modeled mass-balance distribution (see next paragraph). With a focus on Vernagtferner, the precipitation increases slightly with elevation (by about 100 mm) and also towards the northwesterly margin of the glacier (Fig. 3a). This slight increase is also reflected in the more positive balances modeled in this section of the glacier (Fig. 4a and c). Most parts of the glacier are exposed to high amounts of global radiation during summer, and only the tongue and steep slopes at ‘Schwarzwandbereich’ and the southernmost accumulation region at ‘Brochkogelbereich’ show somewhat reduced amounts of potential global radiation (Fig. 3b). This is also reflected in the modeled mass-balance distribution, in which the related parts in the accumulation region have somewhat less negative balances than other regions at the same elevation. Hence, the modeled mass-balance distribution agrees best with the observations in regions where the prescribed radiation and precipitation grids have a comparably higher influence on the model results.

Modeled mass-balance pattern

Clearly, the model was not able to reproduce the positive mass balance in the region around ‘Taschachjochbereich’ in 1997/98, or the complex pattern of the ELA in 1998/99. In the first case, the wrongly modeled region might have benefited from drifting snow deposited in the lee side of the main ridge (Reference Paul, Kääb and HaeberliPlattner and others, 2006). In the second case, small-scale undulations of the topography (e.g. local depressions) might have been responsible for the complex ELA structure. Neither of these effects is considered in the model used. With respect to the simplifications made in this model, a more complex parameterization of variables that do depend largely on elevation (e.g. humidity, atmospheric pressure, cloud height) will only shift the absolute values without improving the modeled mass-balance pattern. Moreover, such elevation-dependent variables could not act in opposite directions at the same time, i.e. increasing ablation at the terminus and decreasing it higher up.

On the input data side, it is expected that the consideration of a satellite-derived albedo map from the end of the ablation period would help to improve model performance at the pixel scale (e.g. Reference Kuhn, Markl, Kaser, Nickus, Obleitner and SchneiderMachguth and others, 2006a; Reference Paul, Kotlarski and HoelzlePaul and others, 2008). The summer of 1998 was quite hot and dry, so albedo could easily go down to 0.2 or even less as a result of the accumulation of dust and soot (Reference PaulPaul and others, 2005). A lowering of the albedo by 0.1 at the terminus could increase melt by about 0.8mw.e., as revealed by a sensitivity study at Findelengletscher, Swiss Alps (Reference Paul, Kotlarski and HoelzlePaul and others, 2008). Such an albedo map would also allow an increase in ablation near the terminus and a decrease higher up at the same time.

The overestimation of the mass loss for Kesselwandferner in 1997/98 could also be related to an albedo effect. The model starts with the ice albedo in the entire model domain. For glaciers like Kesselwandferner, which still have a firn reservoir from more positive previous years, this causes more ablation until the first snowfall occurs. The same is true for the summer melt when the snow has disappeared. The model then switches to the 0.3 albedo of ice instead of a 0.4 (or somewhat higher) albedo of firn. The more positive balance in 1998/99 for Hintereisferner is most likely the result of overestimated accumulation at steep slopes.

At the scale of the entire model domain, the precipitation grid used by Reference SchulerSchwarb and others (2001) is certainly the best input dataset available at this high spatial resolution (2 km) for rugged high-mountain terrain. However, empirical studies have shown that, in some regions, strong corrections are required to obtain realistic glacier mass balances. With regard to the model physics, further improvements are expected from a more detailed consideration of accumulation processes, in particular for glaciers with a locally strong influence of snow redistribution. However, getting this correct over large regions in complex terrain might be a challenge for several more years. The detailed mapping of snow thickness at the end of the winter balance (e.g. Reference Machguth, Paul, Hoelzle and HaeberliMachguth and others, 2006b; Reference Paul, Kääb and HaeberliPlattner and others, 2006) and the re-evaluation of time series of measured accumulation for Hintereis- and Vernagtferner (Reference Escher-Vetter, Kuhn and WeberEscher-Vetter and others, 2009) might help to achieve this.

Consequences

Distributed mass-balance models, which are based on the calculation of the energy balance at the glacier surface, allow the consideration of the complex interactions between radiation, temperature and precipitation in rough, high-mountain topography (i.e. where glaciers are located). Despite the simplifications made in this study (e.g. fixed cloud height, ice albedo and surface temperature), a realistic pattern of the mass-balance distribution was obtained for most glaciers, in particular for the more positive 1998/99 balance year. This confirms that the applied grid datasets and the modeling approach suitable for quantitative assessments of mass balance over larger regions. It opens the possibility of assessing climate-change impacts on glacier mass balance by direct use of meteorological data obtained from the output of regional climate models that have similar grid-box sizes to the model domain used here (Reference Paul, Machguth and KääbPaul and others, 2006).

In view of the mass-balance distribution, as obtained in the field, improvements to the model applied here are envisaged for: (1) the ablation region – these involve including a satellite-derived albedo map (Reference Paul, Kotlarski and HoelzlePaul and others, 2008); and (2) the accumulation region, by incorporating snow redistribution at steep slopes due to avalanches (Reference Kuhn, Markl, Kaser, Nickus, Obleitner and SchneiderMachguth and others, 2006a; Reference Greuell and OerlemansGruber, 2007). A promising method for considering the influence of local topographic undulations on snow accumulation has been developed by Reference Plattner, Braun and BrenningPurves and others (1998). The same approach might also be useful for a first-order consideration of the snow redistribution by wind in rugged high-mountain topography. However, the required input data for more complex methods of snow redistribution by wind are still quite demanding (e.g. Reference Bernhardt, Zängl, Liston, Strasser and MauserBernhardt and others, in press) and it is currently unclear whether such approaches will improve the model performance in small regions without degrading it in other regions at the same time. In any case, the manually interpreted mass-balance distribution maps will be of great value to develop and test related approaches.

From a more practical point of view, it seems noteworthy that the comparison with lumped parameters, such as mean annual balance, can also give a good agreement in cases of locally strong over- and underestimations when both average out. Although such regions could be identified by comparing mass-balance profiles, these profiles should be based on manually interpreted calculations for discrete elevation bands rather than regression equations. When a glacier basin is composed of several distinct entities (like Vernagtferner), it is possible that certain parts are modeled much better than others. This would only be revealed when maps of the mass-balance distribution are available for comparison. In regions with a small precipitation gradient (here, a 300mm increase over 1700m of elevation) the pattern of the mass-balance distribution is determined largely by the pattern of mean summer potential global radiation combined with elevation. Accurate calculation of both parameters is thus an important prerequisite for distributed mass-balance modeling over larger regions in rugged terrain.