Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T09:08:47.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Election symbols and vote choice: evidence from India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Alexander Lee*
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
Weihong Qi
Affiliation:
Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA
*
Corresponding author: Alexander Lee; Email: alexander.mark.lee@gmail.com

Abstract

A large literature has shown that ballot order and ballot structure can influence vote choice. We focus on another behavioral cue for voting, the symbols that are assigned to candidates in many democracies. We take advantage of a naturally occurring experiment in India, where independent candidates can choose from a list of free symbols and conflicting choices are resolved by a drawing of lots. We find that winning the draw has a substantial positive effect on vote share. We also find some evidence that candidates attempt to choose their symbols strategically, for instance choosing household goods common in their constituencies.

Type
Research Note
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of EPS Academic Ltd

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banerjee, M (2013) Why India Votes? New Delhi: Routledge India.Google Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J, Elklit, J, Serritzlew, S and Villadsen, LR (2016) Ballot position and election results: evidence from a natural experiment. Electoral Studies 44, 172183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, CW and Cann, DM (2015) Party identification and vote choice in partisan and nonpartisan elections. Political Behavior 37, 4366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomley, PA and Doyle, JR (2006) The interactive effects of colors and products on perceptions of brand logo appropriateness. Marketing Theory 6, 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, Z and Lee, A (2021) Technology and protest: the political effects of electronic voting in India. Political Science Research and Methods 9, 398413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, T (2015) Voting technology, political responsiveness, and infant health: evidence from Brazil. Econometrica 83, 423464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulzar, Saad, Ruiz, Nelson and Robinson, Thomas (Forthcoming) How campaigns respond to ballot position: a new mechanism for order effects. Journal of Politics.Google Scholar
Ho, DE and Imai, K (2008) Estimating causal effects of ballot order from a randomized natural experiment the California alphabet lottery, 1978–2002. Public Opinion Quarterly 72, 216240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, VO (1949) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Kim, N, Krosnick, J and Casasanto, D (2015) Moderators of candidate name-order effects in elections: an experiment. Political Psychology 36, 525542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koppell, JGS and Steen, JA (2004) The effects of ballot position on election outcomes. The Journal of Politics 66, 267281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, ML (2005) Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. The Journal of Politics 67, 201219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muraoka, T (2021) The electoral implications of politically irrelevant cues under demanding electoral systems. Political Science Research and Methods 9, 312326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lee and Qi supplementary material
Download undefined(File)
File 184 KB
Supplementary material: Link

Lee and Qi Dataset

Link