Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T14:19:53.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on the Paper of Professor Arakawa on the Growth of Ice Crystals in Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2017

J. W. Glen*
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Article Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1955

The beautiful photographs obtained by Professor Arakawa show clearly how ice crystals develop from the liquid, and in particular how the dendrites start. I would like to suggest another reason why the growth is initially in the form of a disc and only subsequently in the form of dendrites. There are two different factors that can determine the shape of growing crystals; one is the surface energy of the crystal, and the other is the ease with which heat can flow from the water to allow it to freeze onto the crystal. The first process tends to make crystals equiaxed and dominates when the rate of growth is small, the second promotes dendritic growth and occurs when the rate of growth is large. It seems from the photographs of Arakawa that, in the initial stages of growth, a disc-shaped crystal forms because, while the crystal properties of ice dictate a planar form, they do not dictate any preferred directions in this plane. At this stage no difficulty is experienced in getting rid of the latent heat. In fact the disc may be thought of as rather similar to the tip of the dendrite subsequently formed. When the disc has grown to such a stage that its radius of curvature is large compared to a length determined by the rate of growth and the thermal conductivity of the melt, the heat flow term begins to dominate, and any small irregularities in the circular form of the disc tend to be enlarged as dendrites, despite the increased surface energy involved, because they stick out and can therefore dispose of the latent heat more easily. This would account for the “notched crystal.” Finally, the dendrites in the direction in which growth is easiest grow faster than their neighbours to give the stellar shape.

This explanation differs from Arakawa’s in that it does not depend on any internal stresses to account for the branching out of dendrites. His explanation is probably true in the case of the crystals whose branches had different crystallographic orientations from the mother needles, but it would seem to be unnecessary where, as in the case of the stellar crystals, no orientation difference is present.