Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:39:13.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle, and Laure Lansari (Eds.), Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2018. Pp. 366. ISBN 978-90-272-0096-9 (Hb), 978-90-272-6390-2 (E-book)

Review products

Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle, and Laure Lansari (Eds.), Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2018. Pp. 366. ISBN 978-90-272-0096-9 (Hb), 978-90-272-6390-2 (E-book)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2019

YAPEI LI  and
SIQI LYU
YAPEI LI
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics E-mail: liyapeisy@126.com
SIQI LYU
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

Bickel, B. (2007). Typology in the 21st century: major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, B. (2015). Distributional typology: statistical inquiries into the dynamics of linguistic diversity. In Bernd, H. & Heiko, N. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 901–923). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cornillie, B. (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: on the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16(1), 44–62.Google Scholar
Culioli, A. (1990). Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation(Vol. 1). Gap: Ophrys.Google Scholar
de Haan, F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18, 83–101.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Hilpert, M. (2008). The identification of stages in diachronic data: variability-based neighbor clustering. Corpora 3(1), 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennemann, A. (2012). The epistemic and evidential use of Spanish modal adverbs and verbs of cognitive attitude. Folia Linguistica 46(1), 133–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C., & Levin, B. (2008). Measure of change: the adjectival core of degree achievements. In McNally, L. & Kennedy, C. (Eds.), Adjectives and adverbs: syntax, semantics and discourse (pp. 156–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kronning, H. (2001). Pour une tripartition des emplois du modal devoir. Cahiers Chronos 8, 67–84.Google Scholar
Lyu, S., & Wang, Y. (2018). Review of Evidentiality revisited: cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Cognitive Linguistics 29(4), 843–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson-Ehle, H. (1943). Le conditionnel ‘futur du passé’ et la périphrase devait + infinitif. Studia Neophilologica 16, 50–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. (2017). Evidentiality reconsidered. In Marín Arrese, J. I., Haßler, G., & Carretero, M. (Eds.), Evidentiality revisited: cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (pp. 57–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossari, C. (2016). Les fluctuations de sens dans quelques formes modales à la lumière d’une approche quantitative et qualitative. Studii de Lingvistică 6, 127–142.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squartini, M. (2004). Disentangling evidentiality and epistemic modality in romance. Lingua 114(7), 873–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar