Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:09:56.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy, transport, and consumption in the Industrial Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2019

Joseph A. Tainter  and
Temis G. Taylor Open the ORCID record for Temis G. Taylor [Opens in a new window]
Joseph A. Tainter
Affiliation:
Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322joseph.tainter@usu.eduhttps://qcnr.usu.edu/envs/people/faculty/tainter_joseph
Temis G. Taylor
Affiliation:
Alan Alda Center for Communicating Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794. temis.taylor@stonybrook.eduhttps://www.aldacenter.org/users/temis-taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We question Baumard's underlying assumption that humans have a propensity to innovate. Affordable transportation and energy underpinned the Industrial Revolution, making mass production/consumption possible. Although we cannot accept Baumard's thesis on the Industrial Revolution, it may help explain why complexity and innovation increase rapidly in the context of abundant energy.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e209
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrose, S. H. (2001) Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science 291:1748–53.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S., Campbell, B. M. S., Klein, A., Overton, M. & van Leeuwen, B. (2015) British economic growth, 1270–1870. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chayanov, A. V. (1966) The theory of peasant economy, trans. Smith, R. E. F. & Lane, C.. Richard D. Irwin for the American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Fouquet, R. & Broadberry, S. (2015) Seven centuries of European economic growth and decline. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 29:227–44.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. S. (2004) The continuing importance of maximum power. Ecological Modelling 178:107–13.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. (1964) The later Roman Empire: A social, economic and administrative survey, pp. 284–602. University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Maddison Project (2013) The Maddison Project database 2013 version. Available at: http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/maddison-project/home.htm.Google Scholar
Rendell, L., Boyd, R., Cownden, D., Enquist, M., Eriksson, K., Feldman, M. W., Fogarty, L., Ghirlanda, S., Lillicarap, T. & Laland, K. N. (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament. Science 328:208–13.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. (1972) Stone Age economics. Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Smil, V. (1994) Energy in world history. Westview.Google Scholar
Tainter, J. A. & Patzek, T. W. (2012) Drilling down: The Gulf oil debacle and our energy dilemma. Copernicus Books.Google Scholar
Tainter, J. A., Strumsky, D., Taylor, T. G., Arnold, M. & Lobo, J. (2018) Depletion vs. innovation: The fundamental question of sustainability. In: Physical limits to economic growth: Perspectives of economic, social, and complexity science, ed. Burlando, R. & Tartaglia, A., pp. 65–93. Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. G. & Tainter, J. A. (2016) The nexus of population, energy, innovation, and complexity. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 75:1005–43.Google Scholar
Warde, P. (2007) Energy consumption in England and Wales, 1560–2000. Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, Istituto Di Studi Sulle Società del Mediterraneo.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (2010) Energy and the English industrial revolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar