Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:13:40.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Piketty and the Gilded Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2020

Monica Prasad*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: m-prasad@northwestern.edu

Extract

After Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century, comparing our era to the Gilded Age is no longer just a metaphor: Piketty argues that we never actually left the Gilded Age. The mid-twentieth-century period of lower inequality was a massive and perhaps unrepeatable exception to what Piketty sees as the natural tendencies toward inequality inherent in capitalist societies. But comparing our current period of relentless cuts in taxes and rising inequality to the Gilded Age shows why our period cannot be a repeat of the Gilded Age: the Gilded Age itself led to so many transformations to capitalism that inequality no longer leads to the political outrage that could anchor a broad-based progressive movement. The Gilded Age led to policies that made capitalism bearable, and that is precisely what is leading now to a situation in which Americans identify their success with the free market, and resist policies to lower inequality.

Type
Special Issue: A Second Gilded Age?
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Historians of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 Piketty, Thomas, Capital in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Prasad, Monica, Starving the Beast: Ronald Reagan and the Tax Cut Revolution (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 See, for instance, Burgin, Angus, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012), 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Grossmann, Matt and Hopkins, David A., Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.