Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:24:53.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of oral health in intestinal failure patients receiving home parenteral nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2011

A. M. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, North West London Hospitals NHS TrustHA13UJ
S. M. Gabe
Affiliation:
Lennard-Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St Mark's HospitalHA1 3UJ, UK, Imperial College
J. M. Nightingale
Affiliation:
Lennard-Jones Intestinal Failure Unit, St Mark's HospitalHA1 3UJ, UK
J. Fiske
Affiliation:
Special Care Dentistry, LondonSE1 9RT, UK
M. Burke
Affiliation:
Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, LondonSE1 9RT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

There are no published oral health studies of people with long-term intestinal failure requiring intravenous nutrition (HPN). However, medical treatments used in this patient group can impact negatively on oral health and dental care delivery.

Fifty-two HPN outpatients were recruited from a specialised nutrition clinic of a National referral centre. Consenting patients listed their medical and medication history, perceived oral health and dental treatment in a structured interview and underwent an oral examination. Findings were compared with means from the 1998 UK Adult Dental Health Survey(Reference Kelly, Steele and Nuttall1) using one-sample t tests. Additionally, an e-mail questionnaire was sent to the UK HPN Group, to determine views on oral health and prescribing practices of consultant gastroenterologists (68% response rate).

The patient sample reflected the UK HPN population (BAPEN(2)). Oral health of the HPN cohort was poorer than the UK norm; patients had more decay (P<0.001) fewer teeth (P<0.001) and fewer sound and untreated teeth (P=0.023) despite similar dental attendance. Hyperphagia, sip feeds, oral rehydration fluids and polypharmacy (in 96%), increase caries, xerostomia (in 81%) and thus oral infection risk (including oral candidiasis). The patient pathway does not include oral health information. Management of HPN-related complications with bisphosphonate therapy, anticoagulation and parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis were associated with impaired access to dental care for 33%. Patients were experiencing current problems (60%) and psychological discomfort (56%) from poor oral health, but were less anxious about dental treatment. Gastroenterologists report concern that dental disease/treatment could have an impact on patient health.

HPN patients have multiple risk factors that adversely affect oral health, and hence potential diet and well-being. Guidance on oral health and dental care provision is required.

References

1.Kelly, M, Steele, J, Nuttall, N et al. (2000) Adult Dental Health Survey: Oral Health in the UK 1998. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
2.BAPEN: British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (2008) Annual BANS Report. Artificial Nutrition Support in the UK 2007 [B Jones B, editor]. Available at http://www.bapen.org.uk (accessed 07 April 2009).Google Scholar