Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:17:41.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Having It Both Ways with Erving Goffman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2019

John Plotz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians of social science from Anthony Giddens forward have ably chronicled Erving Goffman's legacy. Goffman's resonant book titles alone hint at the Dickensian acuity of his social close-reading: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (1956), Behavior in Public Places (1963), Interaction Ritual (1967), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (1974), and Forms of Talk (1981). I envy newcomers the opportunity to read pieces like “On Cooling the Mark Out” (1952) and “Where the Action Is” (1967) with fresh eyes. Goffman, born in 1922 in Alberta, Canada, to Ukrainian parents, attended the University of Manitoba and the University of Toronto before receiving a PhD in sociology from Chicago. His fieldwork was in the Shetlands, and Asylums: Essays on the Condition of the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (1961) and Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (1963) were both written after a period of ethnographic immersion at St. Elizabeth's mental hospital in Washington, DC. It may help first-time readers to know that as an adolescent he had a “special aptitude for noticing details of people's interpersonal conduct”; also that “his Chicago classmates nicknamed him ‘the little dagger’ because of his talent for the pointed personal comment. Sometimes, they felt, he never knew when to stop.”

Type
Defamiliarizations
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , Summer 2019 , pp. 439 - 448
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Garden City: Doubleday, 1958.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. “Blurred Genres: The Refiguration of Social Thought.” American Scholar 49, no. 2 (1980): 165–79.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Behavior in Public Places. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1963.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. “Embarrassment and Social Organization.” American Journal of Sociology 62, no. 3 (1956): 264–71.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Gender Advertisements. Washington: Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1976.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. Interaction Ritual. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre, 1956.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. “On Goffman's Frame Analysis.” Theory and Society 3, no. 1 (1976): 119–33.Google Scholar
Johnson, Steven. Everything Bad Is Good for You: How Today's Popular Culture Is Actually Making Us Smarter. New York: Riverhead Books, 2005.Google Scholar
Lanier, Jaron. Dawn of the New Everything: Encounters with Reality and Virtual Reality. New York: Henry Holt, 2017.Google Scholar
Leys, Ruth. The Ascent of Affect: Genealogy and Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ling, Rich. “The ‘Unboothed Phone’: Goffman and the Use of Mobile Communication.” In The Contemporary Goffman, edited by Jacobsen, M. H., 275–92. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar
Love, Heather. “Close but Not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn.” New Literary History 41 (2010): 371–91.Google Scholar
Plotz, John. “The Return of the Blob, or How Sociology Decided to Stop Worrying and Love the Crowd.” In Crowds, edited by Schnapp, Jeffrey and Tiews, Matthew, 203–24. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher. Keats and Embarrassment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Smith, Greg. Erving Goffman. New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Vargas Maseda, Ramón. Deciphering Goffman: The Structure of His Sociological Theory Revisited. New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar