Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T17:56:07.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Bureaucracies Listen to Courts: Bureaucratized Calculations and European Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Scott L. Greer  and
Maria Martín de Almagro Iniesta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The European Court of Justice, and courts in general, were key actors in the creation of the European Union (EU). However, they cannot change major policy without political supporters to lobby and litigate for implementation. We argue that part of the resolution of this apparent paradox comes from complementing existing work on the activities of EU courts and litigants with a focus on a third actor: implementing bureaucracies, whose effect on law and politics has not been a focus of studies of EU legal development. Their calculations about whether to pay attention, lobby, and comply shape the impact of the law. Those calculations are variable and patterned; when and how bureaucracies listen to courts varies in predictable ways. We find evidence for this proposition in the case of EU health care services law, both in the secondary literature and in empirical studies of France and Spain.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , Spring 2014 , pp. 361 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, K. J. 1998. Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1): 121–147.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J., and Helfer, L. R. 2010. Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice. International Organization 64:563–592.Google Scholar
Baeten, Rita 2005. Health Care: After the Court, the Policymakers Get Down to Work. In Social Developments of the European Union, ed. Degryse, C. and Pochet, P., 79–108. Brussels: ETUI/OSE.Google Scholar
Baeten, Rita, Vanhercke, Bart, and Coucheir, Michael 2010. The Europeanization of National Health Care Systems: Creative Adaptation in the Shadow of Patient Mobility Case Law. Brussels: OSE. http://www.ose.be (accessed May 2013).Google Scholar
Bell, J. 2008. Legal Leadership in the European Union. In Leaderless Europe, ed. Hayward, J., 211–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bindi, Federiga, and Cisci, Manuela 2005. Italy and Spain: A Tale of Contrasting Effectiveness in the EU. In The Member States of the European Union, ed. Bulmer, Simon and Lequesne, Christian, 142–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja 2002. States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja 2007. Environmental Policy. In Europeanization: New Research Agendas, ed. Graziano, Paolo and Vink, Maarten, 226–238. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brooks, Eleanor 2012. Crossing Borders: A Critical Review of the Role of the European Court of Justice in EU Health Policy. Health Policy 105 (1): 33–37.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne‐Marie, and Mattli, Walter 1993. Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization 47 (1): 41–76.Google Scholar
Canon, B. C., and Johnson, C. A. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ.Google Scholar
Cichowski, R. A. 2007. The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Closa, Carlos, and Heywood, Paul 2004. Spain and the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coen, David, ed. 2007. EU Lobbying: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohen, Antonin, and Vauchez, Antoine 2007. Law, Lawyers, and Transnational Politics in the Production of Europe. Law and Social Inquiry 32 (1): 75–82.Google Scholar
Cole, A. 2008. Governing and Governance in France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa 2002. Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa 2007. Review Article: The Politics of Legal Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (Supp.): 45–66.Google Scholar
Costa, Oriol 2006. Spain as an Actor in European and International Climate Policy: From a Passive to an Active Laggard? South European Society and Politics 11 (2): 223–240.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1957. Decision‐Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy‐Maker. Journal of Public Law 6:279–295.Google Scholar
Drake, Helen, ed. 2005. French Relations with the European Union. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erkulwater, Jennifer 2006. Disability Rights and the American Social Safety Net. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice. 2009. Annual Report. Luxembourg: Publications Service of the European Union.Google Scholar
Falkner, Gerda, Hartlapp, Miriam, and Treib, Oliver 2007. Worlds of Compliance: Why Leading Approaches to European Union Implementation are Only “Sometimes‐True” Theories. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 395–416.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. 2011. Scheingold's Failure: His Finest Book. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, September, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M. 2005. The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey 1995. The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization 49 (1): 171–181.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. 1967. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glinos, Irene 2012. Worrying About the Wrong Thing: Patient Mobility Versus Mobility of Health Care Professionals. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 17 (4): 254–256.Google Scholar
Glinos, Irene, Baeten, Rita, and Maarse, Hans 2010. Purchasing Health Services Abroad: Practices of Cross‐Border Contracting and Patient Mobility in Six European Countries. Health Policy 95 (2): 103–112.Google Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H. 2003. “Executives in Comparative Context.” In Governing Europe, ed. Hayward, Jack and Menon, Anand, 74–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graziano, Paolo, and Vink, Maarten, eds. 2007. Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L. 2006. Uninvited Europeanization: Neo‐Functionalism and the EU in Health Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1): 134–152.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L. 2009a. The Changing World of European Union Health Lobbies. In Lobbying in the European Union, ed. Coen, D. and Richardson, J., 189–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L. 2009b. The Politics of European Union Health Policies. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L. 2011. The Weakness of Strong Policies and the Strength of Weak Policies: Law, Experimentalist Governance, and Supporting Coalitions in European Union Health Care Policy. Regulation & Governance 5 (2): 187–203.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L. 2013. Avoiding Another Directive: The Unstable Politics of European Union Cross‐Border Healthcare Law. Health Economics Policy and Law. doi:10.1017/S1744133112000424.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L., and Jarman, Holly 2012. Managing Risks in European Union Health Services Policy: Spot Markets, Legal Certainty and Bureaucratic Resistance. Journal of European Social Policy 22 (3): 259–272.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L., and Martin de Almagro Iniesta, Maria 2012. Being Spain in Brussels: Policy Bureaucracy, Agenda Setting and Negotiation in the EU Policy Process. International Journal of Iberian Studies 24 (2): 71–89.Google Scholar
Greer, Scott L., and Rauscher, Simone 2011. Destabilization Rights and Restabilization Politics: Policy and Political Reactions to European Union Health Care Services Law. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 220–240.Google Scholar
Hayward, Jack, and Wright, Vincent 2002. Governing from the Centre: Core Executive Coordination in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., Alter, Karen, and Guerzovich, M. Florencia 2009. Islands of Effective International Adjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in the Andean Community. American Journal of International Law 103 (1): 1–47.Google Scholar
Hervey, Tamara, and McHale, Jean 2004. Health Law and the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hervey, Tamara, and Vanhercke, Bart 2010. Health Care and the EU: The Law and Policy Patchwork. In Health Systems Governance in Europe: The Role of EU Law and Policy, ed. Mossialos, Elias et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran 2008. The Judicialization of Mega‐Politics and the Rise of Political Courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11:93–118.Google Scholar
Hollis‐Brusky, A. 2011. Support Structures and Constitutional Change: Teles, Southworth, and the Conservative Legal Movement. Law & Social Inquiry 36 (2): 516–536.Google Scholar
Holzinger, Katharina, and Knill, Christoph 2005. Cases and Conditions of Cross‐National Policy Convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 775–796.Google Scholar
Horowitz, D. L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. D., and Warner, K. E. 1999. Litigation and Public Health Policymaking: The Case of Tobacco Control. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 24 (2): 769–804.Google Scholar
Jelfs, Elisabeth, and Baeten, Rita 2013. Simulation on the EU Cross‐Border Care Directive. Final Report. Brussels: OSE/EHMA/AIM.Google Scholar
Kaeding, M. 2007. Administrative Convergence Actually—An Assessment of the European Commission's Best Practices for Transposition of EU Legislation in France, Italy, Sweden and Greece. Journal of European Integration 29 (4): 425–445.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel 2011. Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Schmidt, Susanne K. 2012. Introduction—The European Court of Justice and Legal Integration: Perpetual Momentum? Journal of European Public Policy 19 (1): 1–7 Google Scholar
Lanceron, Virginie 2007. Du SGCI au SGAE: Évolution d'une Administration de Coordination au Coeur de la Politique Européenne de la France. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Legido‐Quigley, H., McKee, M., Glinos, I., and Baeten, R. 2007. Patient Mobility in the European Union. BMJ 334 (27): 188–190.Google Scholar
Lequesne, Christian 1993. Paris‐Bruxelles: Comment se Fait la Politique Européenne de la France. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Luaces, Pilar 2002. Circumventing Adaptation Pressure? Implementing EU Environmental Policy in Spain. South European Society and Politics 7 (3): 81–108.Google Scholar
MacLennan, J. C. 2004. España en Europa, 1945–2000: Del Ostracismo a la Modernidad. Madrid: Marical Pons.Google Scholar
Magalhaes, P. C., Guarnieri, C., and Kaminis, Y. 2006. Democratic Consolidation, Judicial Reform, and the Judicialization of Politics in Southern Europe. In Democracy and the State in the New Southern Europe, ed. Gunter, R., Diamandouros, P., and Sotiropoulos, D., 138–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magone, José M. 2004. Contemporary Spanish Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mangenot, M. 2005. The Conseil d'État and Europe: Adapting the French Administrative State. In French Relations with the European Union, ed. Drake, Helen, 86–105. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martinsen, Dorte S. 2005. Towards an Internal Health Market with the European Court. West European Politics 28 (5): 1035–1056.Google Scholar
Martinsen, Dorte S., and Blomqvist, Paula 2009. The European Union: Single Market Pressures. In Nordic Health Care Systems: Recent Reforms and Current Policy Challenges, ed. Magnussen, Jon, Vrangbaek, Karsten, and Saltman, Richard B. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Slaughter, Anne‐Marie 1998. Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization 52 (1): 177–209.Google Scholar
McCann, M. W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menon, Anand 2000. France. In The National Co‐Ordination of EU Policy: The Domestic Level, ed. Kassim, Hussein, Peters, B. Guy, and Wright, Vincent Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Menon, Anand 2001. The French Administration in Brussels. In The National Co‐Ordination of EU Policy: The European Level, ed. Kassim, Hussein, Menon, Anand, Peters, B. Guy, and Wright, Vincent Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morata, Francesc, and Mateo, Gemma, eds. 2007. España en Europa, Europa en España. Barcelona: CIDOB.Google Scholar
Mossialos, E., Permanand, G., Baeten, R., and Hervey, T. K. 2010. Health Systems Governance in Europe: The Role of EU Law and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Obermaier, Andreas J. 2008. The National Judiciary‐Sword of European Court of Justice Rulings: The Example of the Kohll/Decker Jurisprudence. European Law Journal 14 (6): 735–752.Google Scholar
Obermaier, Andreas J. 2009. The End of Territoriality? The Impact of ECJ Rulings on British, German and French Social Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Powell, Charles 2009. A Second Transition, or More of the Same? Spanish Foreign Policy Under Zapatero. South European Society and Politics 14 (4): 519–536.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte 1986. On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1995. The Real World of Constitutional Rights: The Supreme Court and the Implementation of the Abortion Decisions. In Contemplating Courts, ed. Epstein, L., 390–419. Washington, DC: CQ.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Simon, W. H. 2004. Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds. Harvard Law Review 117 (4): 1015–1101.Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F., and Zeitlin, J. 2007. Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union. European Law Journal 14 (3): 271–327.Google Scholar
Sanz Díaz, Carlos 2003. La Administración Exterior del Estado. In La Política Exterior de España (1800–2001), ed. Pereira, Juan Carlos, 169–186. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. 2002. The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (4): 645–670.Google Scholar
Scheaff, R. 1997. Healthcare Access and Mobility Between the UK and Other European Union States: An “Implementation Surplus”. Health Policy 42 (3): 239–253.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1971. European Integration Through Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm, and Wesseling, Rein 1997. The Legal Community: Judges, Lawyers, Officials and Clerks in the Writing of Europe. European Law Journal 3 (2): 165–188.Google Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, H. 2010. Mass Incarceration and the Paradox of Prison Conditions Litigation. Law & Society Review 44 (3–4): 731–768.Google Scholar
Segal, J. A., Spaeth, H. J., and Benesh, S. C. 2005. The Supreme Court in the American Legal System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. 2004. The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van De Gronden, J. W., Szyszczak, E., Neergard, U., and Krajewski, M., eds. 2011. Health Care and EU law. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Versluis, E. 2007. Even Rules, Uneven Practices: Opening the Black Box of EU Law in Action. West European Politics 30 (10): 50–67.Google Scholar
Wasserfallen, F. 2010. The Judiciary as Legislator? How the European Court of Justice Shapes Policy‐Making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 17 (8): 1128–1146.Google Scholar
Wismar, M. et al. 2011. Cross‐Border Healthcare in the EU: Mapping and Analyzing Practices and Policies. Brussels: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies.Google Scholar
Wright, Vincent 1996. The National Coordination of European Policy‐Making: Negotiating the Quagmire. In European Union: Power and Policy‐Making, ed. Richardson, J. J., 148–169. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zahariadis, Nicolaos 2008. Europeanization as Program Implementation: Effective and Democratic? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10 (3): 221–239.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Bush v. Gore, Citizens United, 531 U.S. 98 (2000).Google Scholar
C‐120/95 Decker; Judgment of 28/04/1998, Decker/Caisse de maladie des employés privés (Rec. 1998, p. I‐1831).Google Scholar
C‐158/91 Kohll, Judgment of 28/04/1998, Kohll/Union des caisses de maladie (Rec. 1998, p. I‐1931).Google Scholar
Case C‐173/09 Elchinov; Pending Case.Google Scholar
C‐372/04 Watts. Judgment of 16/05/2006, Watts (Rec. 2006, p. I‐4325).Google Scholar
Case C‐512/08, Commission of the European Communities v French Republic; Pending Case.Google Scholar
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Act nr. 2004‐810, Loi n° 2004‐810 du 13 août 2004 relative à l'assurance maladie, République de France, NOR: SANX0400122L.Google Scholar
Code de la sécurité sociale, Article R. 332‐3, on the Differentiation Between EU and Non‐EU Cases.Google Scholar
Code de la sécurité sociale, Article R. 332‐4, on Reimbursement of Ambulatory Treatment Received Abroad.Google Scholar
COM (2008) 0414, passed as 2011/24/EU, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Application of Patients' Rights in Cross‐Border Healthcare.Google Scholar
Decree nr. 2005‐386 of 19 April 2005, République de France, Décret n° 2005‐386 du 19 avril 2005 relatif à la prise en charge des soins reçus hors de France et modifiant le code de la sécurité sociale (Deuxième Partie: Décrets en Conseil d'Etat).Google Scholar
DSS/DACI nr. 2001‐120, Circular of 1 March 2001, Republic of France, Reimbursement of Optical Products Purchased Abroad and Prescribed in France.Google Scholar
DSS/DACI nr. 2003‐286, Circular of 16 June 2003, Republic of France, Reimbursement of Registered Medications and Medical Equipment Purchased Abroad; Reimbursement of Ambulatory Treatment Received Abroad.Google Scholar
DSS/DACI nr. 2004‐134, Circular of 23 March 2004, Republic of France, on the Case by Case Reimbursement of Non‐Registered Medical Products.Google Scholar
DSS/DACI nr. 2005/235, Circular of 19 May 2005, on the Completion of the Integration into National Law of Community Case‐Law Relating to Freedom to Provide Services and the Free Movement of Goods in the Area of Medical Care.Google Scholar