Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:10:15.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship between zinc intake and indices of cognitive function: A systematic review and meta-analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2013

M. Warthon-Medina
Affiliation:
International Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
S. Dillon
Affiliation:
International Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
V. Hall Moran
Affiliation:
Maternal and Infant Nutrition and Nurture Unit MAINN, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR4 4AF, UK
A. L. Stammers
Affiliation:
International Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
P. Qualter
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
M. Nissensohn
Affiliation:
Ciber Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN, CB06/03), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain
L. Serra Majem
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, P.O. Box 550, 35080, Spain
N. M. Lowe
Affiliation:
International Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

Brain growth and development are critically dependent on several micronutrients( Reference Black 1 ). Zinc is one of these micronutrients and is found in high levels in the brain particularly the hippocampus, the area of the brain considered to be involved in learning and memory( Reference Levenson 2 ). During early development, cellular activity may be particularly sensitive to zinc deficiency which may compromise cognitive development and attention( Reference Black 3 , Reference Sandstead, Frederickson and Penland4 ); however, the evidence from human studies is equivocal( Reference Black 5 ).

As part of a series of systematic reviews of zinc intake, status and health outcome relationships, undertaken by the EURRECA( Reference Pijls, Ashwell and Lambert 6 ) consortium, a systematic review of published literature examining the relationship between dietary zinc intake and indices of cognitive function in adult and elderly populations, and children aged 1 to 18 years, was undertaken according to a pre-defined search protocol( Reference Matthys, de Groot, Hooper, Cavelaars, Collings, Donutske-Rutten, Harvey, Casgrain, Rollin and Contor 7 ). The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE (both on Ovid) and the Cochrane Library CENTRAL from inception to March 2013. Following the EURRECA protocol of screening and sorting, 2173 studies were assessed for eligibility criteria. Data was extracted from 19 studies across all population groups that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria (12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and 7 observational studies). Meta-analysis of data extracted from 7 RCTs conducted in children was undertaken using Review Manager (5.2). A random effects model was used to investigate the impact of zinc intake on indices of cognitive function including intelligence (7 data sets from 862 children), executive function (7 data sets from a 942 children), and motor development (4 data sets from 622 children).

The analysis yielded a pooled standard mean difference for the impact of zinc supplementation on intelligence of 0.06 (95% CI −0.10, 0.22) p=0.47; executive function, 0.13 (95% CI, −0.02, 029) p=0.10 and motor development, −0.05 (95% CI −0.36, 0.26) p=0.75. These results revealed that there was no significant overall effect of zinc supplementation on these cognitive function outcomes assessed in children.

Due to the heterogeneity of the cognitive function test methodology, only a small number of studies could be included in the meta-analysis. To date, the evidence regarding the effect of zinc intake on cognitive function remains inconclusive. However, taking all the studies per population as a whole there is some evidence for a positive association between zinc and cognitive function and there is a need for further high quality RCTs to investigate this relationship.

This research was undertaken as an activity of the European Micronutrient Recommendations Aligned (EURRECA) Network of Excellence (www.eurreca.org), funded by the European Commission Contract Number FP6 036196–2 (FOOD). The original conception of the systematic review was undertaken by the EURRECA Network and coordinated by partners based at Wageningen University (WU), the Netherlands and the University of East Anglia (UEA), United Kingdom. Also supported by Funds for Women Graduates (FfWG) (http://ffwg.org.uk/).

References

1. Black, MM (2003) Micronutrient deficiencies and cognitive functioning. J. Nutr. 133(11), 3927S–31S.Google Scholar
2. Levenson, CW (2006) Regulation of the NMDA receptor: Implications for neuropsychological development. Nutrition Reviews 64(9), 428–32.Google Scholar
3. Black, MM (1998) Zinc deficiency and child development. Am J Clin Nutr. 68(2 SUPPL.).Google Scholar
4. Sandstead, HH, Frederickson, CJ & Penland, JG. (2000) History of Zinc as Related to Brain Function. J. Nutr. 130(2), 496.Google Scholar
5. Black, MM (2003) The evidence linking zinc deficiency with children's cognitive and motor functioning. J. Nutr. 133(5), 1473S–6S.Google Scholar
6. Pijls, L, Ashwell, M & Lambert, J (2009) EURRECA – A Network of Excellence to align European micronutrient recommendations. Food Chemistry 113(3), 748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Matthys, C vTVP, de Groot, L, Hooper, L, Cavelaars, AE, Collings, R, Donutske-Rutten, R, Harvey, LJ, Casgrain, A, Rollin, F, Contor, L. (2011) EURRECA Approach for Estimating Micronutrient Requirements. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 81(4), 256–63.Google Scholar