Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T16:32:37.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Micronutrient diversity in pole and bush type Dolichos bean germplasm: identification of gene sources from biofortification perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Raj Bahadur Yadava
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Rajeev Kumar
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Hare Krishna*
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Kamlesh Yadav
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Nagendra Rai
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Manish Singh
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Jagdish Singh
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
Tusar Kanti Behera
Affiliation:
ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi-221 305, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
Corresponding author: Hare Krishna; Email: kishun@rediffmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Exploring the nutritional potential of underutilized legumes such as Dolichos bean (Lablab purpureus L.) is of great significance, particularly, in view of accomplishing the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goal number two, which emphasizes on improving food and nutrition security by 2030. A thorough understanding of genetic variability is crucial for developing biofortified cultivars of Dolichos bean. In this study, the Dolichos bean genotypes represented by pole and bush types (28 bush and 19 pole types) were assessed for genetic variability for Cu, Mn, Fe and Zn contents. Pole type genotypes had higher average contents for all micronutrients except manganese. Among micronutrients, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn, content ranged from 10.10–19.95, 77.13–331.93, 22.78–46.40 and 42.03–102.85 mg kg−1 in pole type, and 8.2–18.5, 50.8–99.3, 25.65–53.25 and 37.15–63.25 mg kg−1 in bush type beans, respectively. Strong positive correlations between Cu, Fe and Zn concentrations occurred, which indicates the possibility of simultaneous improvement of these nutrients. Pod pigmentation was positively correlated with contents of Fe and Zn. There was an association of micronutrients with yield. The pole genotypes VRSEM-1000, VRDB-01 and VRSEM 109 and bush type genotypes VRBSEM-3, VRBSEM-35 and VRBSEM- 200 are good source of microelements and high yielders. Gene sources with enhanced nutrients may be used as cultivated forms or as input material for breeding nutritionally rich biofortified varieties of bean.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of National Institute of Agricultural Botany

Introduction

Micronutrients are vital to healthy life style and wellbeing. Micronutrient deficiencies, responsible for 7% of the global disease burden (Muthayya et al., Reference Muthayya, Rah, Sugimoto, Roos, Kraemer and Black2013), affect over 2 billion people globally. Almost half of the micronutrient-deficient population resides in India (Yadav and Maurya, Reference Yadav, Maurya, Saeed, Ahmed and Afzaal2022). Fe and Zn deficiencies are widespread, affecting crucial metabolic functions like cell growth, DNA replication and protein synthesis. Copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn) act as enzyme cofactors, supporting growth, cardiovascular health, neuroendocrine function. About 60% of world population is Iron (Fe) -deficient and 33% is zinc (Zn) -deficient (Wessells and Brown, Reference Wessells and Brown2012). Furthermore, Indians diets are also limiting in both iron and zinc (Anand et al., Reference Anand, Rahi, Sharma and Ingle2014).

Legume crops are an important component of human diet. Therefore, it is imperative to explore potentials of underutilized climate-resilient legumes such as Dolichos bean, also known as Indian bean or Lablab bean, in order to avert micronutrient deficiencies among the under-resourced communities. It is seen as one of the most resilient legumes against both biotic and abiotic factors (Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Shabbir, Ansari, Aftab, Khan and Uddin2020); however, it is less popular as human food despite being a nutritious legume (Minde et al., Reference Minde, Venkataramana and Matemu2020). According to growth habits, Dolichos beans are of two types' viz., Pole and Bush or Determinate type (Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Shabbir, Ansari, Aftab, Khan and Uddin2020); however, both types are easy to grow and taste alike. A thorough understanding of nature and extent of genetic variability is crucial for developing biofortified cultivars (Patel et al., Reference Patel, Kale, Kyada, Modha, Chauhan and Patel2022) of Dolichos bean through systematic breeding efforts. Therefore, genetic variability has been investigated for Fe, Zn, Cu and Mn contents in Dolichos bean.

Experimental

Dolichos bean genotypes (28 bush and 19 pole types) were grown under field condition employing definitive cultural practices recommended by the Institute. These genotypes were obtained from various sources (online Supplementary Table S1). The experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design with three replications during 2019–20 and 2020–21. Ten plants were randomly chosen for data recording. The pods were harvested at edible maturity for recording yield per plant (kg). Visual observations recorded growth habits and pod anthocyanin pigmentation. For estimation of micronutrients, the procedures described by Paul and Srivastava (Reference Paul and Srivastava2007) were followed. Contents were expressed in mg/g DW. The results are expressed as means with standard error (S.E.). The significance difference (at P < 0.05) between genotypes was determined by Duncan's multiple range tests at a significance level of 0.05 for all the parameters. Pearson correlation and cluster analysis were done by using SPSS. 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Furthermore, Minitab 14 software was used to conduct principal component analysis (PCA) and normal frequency distribution.

Discussion

The concentrations of four microelements (zinc, copper, iron and manganese) and pod yield of 47 Dolichos bean genotypes varied considerably in the present study. Among micronutrients, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn contents ranged from 10.10–19.95, 77.13–331.93, 22.78–46.40 and 42.03–102.85 mg kg−1 in pole type, while 8.2–18.5, 50.8–99.3, 25.65–53.25 and 37.15–63.25 mg kg−1 in bush type Dolichos bean, respectively (online Supplementary Table S2). In general, pole type genotypes revealed higher average contents for all the micronutrients except manganese. In their study with determinate and indeterminate soybeans, Araújo et al. (Reference Araujo, Santana, Mauad and da Silva2020) observed that the indeterminate varieties had a greater transfer of nutrients than the determinate cultivars. Alam et al. (Reference Alam, Ivy, Islam, Saha and Das2021) reported the Zn and Fe contents as high as 61.86 and 122.22 mg kg−1, respectively. However, in our study, we report the highest Zn and Fe contents of 102.85 and 331.93 mg kg−1, respectively in genotype VRSEM 1000 (online Supplementary Table S2). The magnitude of micronutrients in the present study was substantially higher than those reported by Kumari et al. (Reference Kumari, Naresh, Acharya, Laxminarayana, Singh, Raghu and Aghora2022); thereby, indicating the availability of superior germplasm in our genepool. Differences in micronutrient contents in pods are a function of a gamut of codependent metabolic processes, comprising nutrient uptake dynamics and nutrient partioning (Maganti et al., Reference Maganti, Swaminathan and Parida2020). Pole and bush type genotypes showed normal frequency distributions for most of the parameters studied except for Fe and yield, which did not distribute normally in pole type genotypes (online Supplementary Fig. S1). Some of the pole genotypes like VRSEM-1000, VRDB-01 and VRSEM 109 and bush type genotypes like VRBSEM-3, VRBSEM-35 and VRBSEM- 200 are good source of microelements as well as yield (online Supplementary Table S2 & S3). Such gene sources with enhanced nutrients may be used directly as cultivated forms or indirectly as input material for breeding new, more nutritionally rich varieties of Dolichos bean.

Outcomes of the micronutrients composition and yield in 47 Dolichos bean genotypes were estimated using PCA. In PC-1, Zn (0.545), Fe (0.494) and yield (0.418) contributed the maximum variation (Table 1). Association of some of the pole and bush genotypes in contiguity to each other can be understood by the fact that bush and pole types are cross compatible with each other and involvement of these genotypes in the ongoing breeding programs (online Supplementary Fig. S2). Findings from the loading plot diagram reveals the closer association i.e., smaller angle between the vectors of pod pigmentation, Fe and Zn (online Supplementary Fig. S3). This was in accordance with correlation analysis results that showed significant positive associations between Fe, Cu, Zn, pod colour and yield (Table 2). In our study, Fe and Zn showed strong positive correlation with pod pigmentation. A strong positive correlation between Cu, Fe and Zn concentrations of Dolichos beans in our experiment was concurrent with the findings of the studies by Karakoy et al. (Reference Karakoy, Erdem, Baloch, Toklu, Eker, Kilian and Ozkan2012) and Delfini et al. (Reference Delfini, Moda-Cirino, Dos Santos Neto, Buratto, Ruas and Azeredo Gonçalves2020) in lentil and common bean, respectively. Positive correlations were observed among most micronutrients. This correlation could be advantageous for breeding of nutritionally-superior genotypes as selection for enhancement in one nutrient may be encouraging for other nutrients simultaneously. Pods of Dolichos bean varieties with pigmentation or colouration were found to have higher Fe and Zn contents as evident by the data presented in Table 2. Earlier, Faiz et al. (Reference Faiz, Hanafi, Hakim, Rafii and Akmar Abdullah2015) reported that the pigmented rice genotypes have higher micronutrient contents as compared to white rice genotypes. Evaluation of Dolichos bean genotypes using multivariate analysis based on nutrient content grouped the genotypes into three clusters (online Supplementary Fig. S4). This analysis segregated a maximum of 42 genotypes in Cluster I followed by class II with three genotypes and class III with two genotypes each. Cluster III (VRDB-01 and VRSEM 1000) represents the genotypes, which have higher magnitude of micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn). Selection of parents from Cluster III followed by Cluster II can be utilized in further breeding programme for production of biofortified Dolichos beans. Practically, this means better parental heterosis (superior performance of hybrids over parents), where higher values for traits like micronutrients concentration indicate superior parents. Selection of identified genotypes, from different clusters based on desirable traits, as parent in future breeding programme may generate new recombinants with improved heterosis (Kumari et al., Reference Kumari, Naresh, Acharya, Laxminarayana, Singh, Raghu and Aghora2022).

Table 1. Eigenvalues and proportion of total variability and eigenvectors of three principal components (PCs) for studied Dolichos bean genotypes

Table 2. Coefficients of correlation (r) between concentrations of micronutrients and yield attributes recorded on 19 pole and 28 bush types Dolichos bean genotypes

a Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

b Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262123001077

Acknowledgement

The authors convey thanks to ICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, India for financial support.

References

Alam, MS, Ivy, FI, Islam, MS, Saha, M and Das, AC (2021) A study on morpho-nutritional variability among lablab bean genotypes. American Journal of Agricultural Science, Engineering, and Technology 5, 92102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, T, Rahi, M, Sharma, P and Ingle, GK (2014) Issues in prevention of iron deficiency anemia in India. Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) 30, 764770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araujo, WAD, Santana, RS, Mauad, M and da Silva, RS (2020) Dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in determinate and indeterminate soybeans. Journal of Plant Nutrition 44, 508522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delfini, J, Moda-Cirino, V, Dos Santos Neto, J, Buratto, JS, Ruas, PM and Azeredo Gonçalves, LS (2020) Diversity of nutritional content in seeds of Brazilian common bean germplasm. PloS one 15, e0239263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faiz, A, Hanafi, MM, Hakim, MA, Rafii, MY and Akmar Abdullah, SN (2015) Micronutrients, antioxidant activity, and tocochromanol contents of selected pigmented upland rice genotypes. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 17, 741747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakoy, T, Erdem, H, Baloch, FS, Toklu, F, Eker, S, Kilian, B and Ozkan, H (2012) Diversity of macro-and micronutrients in the seeds of lentil landraces. The Scientific World Journal 2, 710412.Google Scholar
Kumari, M, Naresh, P, Acharya, GC, Laxminarayana, K, Singh, HS, Raghu, BR and Aghora, TS (2022) Nutritional diversity of Indian lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L. Sweet): an approach towards biofortification. South African Journal of Botany 149, 189195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maganti, S, Swaminathan, R and Parida, A (2020) Variation in iron and zinc content in traditional rice genotypes. Agricultural Research 9, 316328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minde, JJ, Venkataramana, PB and Matemu, AO (2020) Dolichos Lablab-an underutilized crop with future potentials for food and nutrition security: a review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 61, 22492261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthayya, S, Rah, JH, Sugimoto, JD, Roos, FF, Kraemer, K and Black, RE (2013) The global hidden hunger indices and maps: an advocacy tool for action. PloS One 8, e67860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeem, M, Shabbir, A, Ansari, AA, Aftab, T, Khan, MMA and Uddin, M (2020) Hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus L.)–An underutilised crop with future potential. Scientia Horticulturae 272, 109551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, GM, Kale, BH and Kyada, AD, Modha, KG Chauhan, DA and Patel, RK (2022) Genetic variability and correlation study in determinate type progenies of Indian bean [Lablab purpureus (L.) sweet]. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 34, 452460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, V and Srivastava, GC (2007) Minerals in pericarp of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) fruit and its ripening behaviour. Journal of Applied Horticulture 9, 140145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessells, KR and Brown, KH (2012) Estimating the global prevalence of zinc deficiency: results based on zinc availability in national food supplies and the prevalence of stunting. PloS One 7, e50568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yadav, L and Maurya, (2022) Fight hidden hunger through national programs and food based approaches. In Saeed, F, Ahmed, A and Afzaal, MM (eds), Combating Malnutrition through Sustainable Approaches. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.104459Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Eigenvalues and proportion of total variability and eigenvectors of three principal components (PCs) for studied Dolichos bean genotypes

Figure 1

Table 2. Coefficients of correlation (r) between concentrations of micronutrients and yield attributes recorded on 19 pole and 28 bush types Dolichos bean genotypes

Supplementary material: File

Yadava et al. supplementary material

Yadava et al. supplementary material
Download Yadava et al. supplementary material(File)
File 404.1 KB