Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:40:55.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Melodic Paradoxes in the Music of the Thai Pi-Phat and Javanese Gamelan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Extract

The two musical cultures of Thailand and Java, especially as conveyed by the leading percussion ensembles (the Thai pi-phat and the Javanese gamelan), share several important concepts, as well as obvious physical similarities between the instruments themselves. Studies by Becker (1968, 1980) draw attention to the “musical family” of Southeast Asia, especially to similarities within “bronze gong cultures” in that region (Becker 1980: 453). One of her papers is a comparison of Thai and Javanese music (Becker 1980). Another feature that paper shares with the present one is that the stimulus for it came from working with a graduate student whose research lay in Thai music, in the latter case an expert Thai performing artist. The present paper investigates what is perhaps the most striking, and paradoxical, similarity between Thai and Javanese music: the processes of improvisation and elaboration turn out to be governed by a melody which is not actually performed. In both traditions the art of playing individual instruments is, broadly, the art of realising this elusive melody according to the idiomatic patterns associated with a particular instrument. How it is done varies greatly from one tradition to the other, and within each ensemble. Theoretical constraints must also be considered. In both traditions rules must be observed, the purpose of which is to create structures which are shaped and balanced in ways not only conveying aesthetic appeal but also suggesting more universal ideas about melodic organisation and logic. Thai musicians tend to talk about what they do in ways which relate to improvisation (kan phrae tamnong, literally “changing the melody”). A similar process may be observed in Javanese music, even if the notion of improvisation is not as prevalent. The comparable term here is gam-pan (literally “working on”). There is no need to give detailed examples of how kan phrae tamnong and garapan work in specific pieces, as this aspect has been thoroughly documented in the literature of the two traditions—for example Brinner (1995), Martopangrawit (1984), Ketukaenchan (1989), Sorrell (2000), Sumrongthong (1997), and Sutton (1979). The main purpose here is to compare Thai and Javanese concepts of unheard melody and their musical realizations.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the International Council for Traditional Music

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Becker, Judith 1968. “Percussive patterns in the Music of Mainland Southeast Asia.” Ethnomusicology 12/2.Google Scholar
Becker, Judith 1980. “A Southeast Asian Musical Process: Thai Thaw and Javanese Irama.” Ethnomusicology 24/3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinner, Benjamin Elon 1995. Knowing music, making music: Javanese gamelan and the theory of musical competence and interaction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hatch, Martin Fellows Jr. 1980. Lagu, Laras, Layang: Rethinking Melody in Javanese Music. Ph.D thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Ketukaenchan, Somsak 1989. The Thang of the Khong Wong Yai and Ranat Ek: A Transcription and Analysis of Performance Practice in Thai Music. D. Phil. thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Martopangrawit, Raden Lurah 1984. Catatan-catatan Pengetahuan Karawitan. Trans. Martin F. Hatch. In Becker, Judith, and Alan Feinstein, eds., Karawitan, vol 1. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sorrell, Neil 2000. A Guide to the Gamelan, 2nd edition, ed. Hatch, M. Ithaca, N.Y.: Society for Asian Music.Google Scholar
Sumarsam 1984. Inner Melody in Javanese Gamelan. Published in Becker, Judith, and Alan Feinstein, eds., Karawitan, vol 1. Originally MA thesis, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumarsam 1995. Gamelan: Cultural Interaction and Musical Development in Central Java. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sumrongthong, Bussakorn 1997. Melodic Organization and Improvisation in Thai Music, with special reference to the Thang Ránaât Eèk. D. Phil. thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Supanggah, Rahayu 1988. “Balungan.” Trans. Marc Perlman. Balungan 3/2.Google Scholar
Sutton, R. Anderson 1979. “Concept and treatment in Javanese gamelan music, with reference to the gambang.” Asian Music 9(2).Google Scholar
Sutton, R. Anderson 1982. Variation in Javanese Gamelan Music: dynamics of a steady state. Ph.D. dissertation University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Wolters, Oliver 1999. History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Ithaca, New York: Southeast Asia Program Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar