Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Subsidies and Investment Promotion Reaching New Heights in the Aviation Sector: The US–Tax Incentives Dispute

  • KRISTY BUZARD (a1) and PANAGIOTIS DELIMATSIS (a2)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the most recent WTO Appellate Body (AB) report in a series of disputes between the US and the EU over government support to aircraft manufacturers Boeing and Airbus. The measures under dispute in US–Tax Incentives were investment promotion subsidies provided to Boeing by the State of Washington. The EU contended that the Washington State subsidies, which were conditioned on Boeing locating production of specific parts of its new 777X program within the state, were prohibited import substitution subsidies. The AB took this case as an opportunity to consolidate WTO case-law on import substitution subsidies. It confirmed a single legal standard for export promotion and import substitution subsidies but with a stricter requirement for a finding of a violation in the case of import substitution subsidies. We argue that the AB, in allowing the subsidies to Boeing, unnecessarily blurred the distinction between contingency in law and contingency in fact by ruling that identifying a condition requiring the use of domestic inputs would be a necessary element for a determination of a de facto contingency. This appears to be an unduly formalistic view that leaves little legal space for any de facto contingency claim in the future.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Subsidies and Investment Promotion Reaching New Heights in the Aviation Sector: The US–Tax Incentives Dispute
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Subsidies and Investment Promotion Reaching New Heights in the Aviation Sector: The US–Tax Incentives Dispute
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Subsidies and Investment Promotion Reaching New Heights in the Aviation Sector: The US–Tax Incentives Dispute
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

Footnotes

Hide All

For insightful comments and suggestions, the authors would like to thank Jürgen Kurtz and the participants of the WTO Case Law 2017 Conference held at the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence, 18–19 June 2018.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Barletta, T.P., Hurst, P.R., and McCue, G.S. (2016), ‘Court Addresses “Substantial Transformation” Standard for Country of Origin Under the Trade Agreements Act’, 20 December 2016, www.steptoe.com/en/news-publications/court-addresses-substantial-transformation-standard-for-country-of-origin-under-the-trade-agreements-act.html.
Boch, M. and Ban, V. (2017), ‘Don't Bind the Supply Chain: Lessons from the Boeing Incentives WTO Panel Report’, Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives, 27(3): 16.
Boeing (2018), ‘Boeing in Brief’, www.boeing.com/company/general-info/#/employment-data.
Fielding, J. P. (2017), Introduction to Aircraft Design, 2nd edn, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Florida, R. (2018), ‘Why Do Politicians Waste So Much Money on Corporate Incentives?’, 24 May 2018, www.citylab.com/equity/2018/05/why-do-politicians-waste-so-much-money-on-corporate-incentives/561149/.
Forshee, S. (2015), ‘Washington State Loses 6,800 Boeing Employees in Less than 3 Years’, 6 March 2015, www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2015/03/06/washington-state-loses-6-800-boeing-employees-in.html.
Hahn, M. and Mehta, K. (2013), ‘It's a Bird, It's a Plane: Some Remarks on the Airbus Appellate Body Report’, EC and Certain Member States – Large Civil Aircraft, WT/DS316/AB/R’, World Trade Review, 12(2): 139161.
Hellerstein, W. and Coenen, D.T. (1996), ‘Commerce Clause Restraints on State Business Development Incentives’, Cornell Law Review, 81(4): 789878.
Hiltzik, M. (2017), ‘Boeing got a record tax break from Washington state and cut jobs anyway. Now the state wants to strike back’, 3 May 2017, www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-boeing-washington-20170503-story.html.
Horlick, G. and Clarke, P. (2017), ‘Rethinking Subsidy Disciplines for the Future: Policy Options for Reform’, Journal of International Economic Law, 20(3): 673703.
Irwin, D. and Pavcnik, N. (2004), ‘Airbus versus Boeing Revisited: International Competition in the Aircraft Market’, Journal of International Economics, 64: 223245.
Johnson, L. and Toledano, P. (2013), ‘Background Paper for the Eighth Columbia International Investment Conference on Investment Incentives: The good, the bad and the ugly. Assessing the costs, benefits and options for policy reform’, http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/VCC_conference_paper_-_Draft_Nov_12.pdf.
Kelly, T. (2014), ‘Japan to Keep Its Share of Production of Boeing's New 777X Aircraft’, 28 April 2014, www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-777x-workshare/japan-to-keep-its-share-of-production-of-boeings-new-777x-aircraft-idUSBREA3R0NX20140428.
Mavroidis, P. (2016), The Regulation of International Trade – Vol.2: The WTO Agreements on Trade in Goods, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neven, D. and Sykes, A. (2014), ‘United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint): Some Comments’, World Trade Review, 13(2): 281298.
Reuters, (2013), ‘Boeing Seen in Advanced Talks to Make 777X near Seattle’, 4 November 2013.
Sykes, A. (2003), ‘The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 186.
Sykes, A. (2010), ‘The Questionable Case for Subsidies Regulation – A Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(2): 473523.

Subsidies and Investment Promotion Reaching New Heights in the Aviation Sector: The US–Tax Incentives Dispute

  • KRISTY BUZARD (a1) and PANAGIOTIS DELIMATSIS (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed