Skip to main content Accessibility help

Services liberalization in the new generation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs): how much further than the GATS?

  • MARTIN ROY (a1), JUAN MARCHETTI (a1) and HOE LIM (a1)


This paper attempts to fill a gap in the trade literature by providing a comprehensive overview of services liberalization commitments in the new generation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) as compared to prevailing GATS commitments and Doha Round offers. The paper reviews the commitments undertaken by 36 WTO Members (counting the EC as one) under mode 1 (cross-border supply) and mode 3 (commercial presence) in 32 PTAs negotiated since 2000. Among other things, the results suggest that, overall, PTA commitments tend to go significantly beyond GATS offers. Countries that have signed PTAs with the United States have made spectacular improvements, but GATS+ commitments are not limited to such agreements. The paper also discusses the potential economic costs arising from these preferential agreements and implications for the role of GATS and for multilateral services negotiations. The paper concludes by exploring possible approaches to overcome the downsides of services PTAs, including suggestions for a more pro-active role for the WTO in the surveillance of these agreements.


Corresponding author


Hide All
Adlung, Rolf and Martin, Roy (2005), ‘Turning Hills into Mountains? Current Commitments under the GATS and Prospects for Change’, Journal of World Trade, 39(6): 11611194.
Antkiewicz, Agata and John, Whalley (2005), ‘China's New Regional Trade Agreements’, World Economy, 28: 10.
Crawford, Jo-Ann and Roberto, Fiorentino (2005), The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, WTO Discussion Paper No. 8.
Evenett, Simon and Michael, Meier (2006), ‘An Interim Assessment of the US Trade Policy of “Competitive Liberalization”’, mimeo, 24 July 2006 (Revised in February 2007; forthcoming in The World Economy).
Fink, Carsten and Aaditya, Mattoo (2004), ‘Regional Agreements and Trade in Services: Policy Issues’, Journal of Economic Integration, 19(4): 742779.
Jansen, Marion (2006), ‘Services Trade Liberalization at the Regional Level: Does Southern and Eastern Africa Stand to Gain from EPA Negotiations?’, WTO Staff Working Paper, May, 2004.
Jara, Alejandro and Carmen, Domínguez (2006), ‘Liberalization of Trade in Services and Trade Negotiations’, Journal of World Trade, 40(1): 113127.
Marchetti, Juan (2004), ‘Developing Countries in the WTO Services Negotiations’, WTO Staff Working Paper, September 2004.
Mattoo, Aaditya and Sacha, Wunsch-Vincent (2004), ‘Pre-Empting Protectionism in Services: The WTO and Outsourcing’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7: 765800.
OECD (2002a), ‘Labour Mobility in Regional Trade Agreements’, Paris.
OECD (2002b), ‘The Relationship Between Regional Trade Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System: Services’, Paris.
Roy, Martin (2003), ‘Implications for the GATS of Negotiations on a Multilateral Investment Framework; Potential Synergies and Pitfalls’, Journal of World Investment, 4(6): 963986.
Roy, Martin (2005), ‘Audiovisual Services in the Doha Round: Dialogue de Sourds, the Sequel?’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, December 2005, 6(6): 923952.
Sen, Rahul (2006), ‘“New Regionalism” in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Emerging Regional and Bilateral Trading Arrangements involving ASEAN, China and India’, Journal of World Trade, 40(4): 553596.
Stephenson, Sherry (2002), ‘Regional Versus Multilateral Liberalisation of Services’, World Trade Review, 1(2): 187209.
Thangavelu, S. M. and Mun-Heng, Toh (2005), ‘Bilateral “WTO-Plus” Free Trade Agreements: The WTO Trade Policy Review of Singapore 2004’, World Economy, 28.
United States General Accounting Office (2004), ‘International Trade – Intensifying Free Trade Negotiating Agenda Calls for Better Allocation of Staff and Resources’, Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO-04-233, January 2004.
WTO (2005), International Trade Statistics 2005, Geneva.

Services liberalization in the new generation of preferential trade agreements (PTAs): how much further than the GATS?

  • MARTIN ROY (a1), JUAN MARCHETTI (a1) and HOE LIM (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed