Skip to main content Accessibility help

Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement



Civil society organizations are often seen as playing a crucial role in helping to mitigate the exclusion of weaker states, giving voice to marginalized communities, and raising environmental and developmental concerns within the trade system. The politicization and demystification of the global trade agenda by civil society also opens up space for a more diverse set of actors to influence trade negotiations. This article examines the evolution of the WTO secretariat's engagement with civil society within this context and argues that the dominant mode of engagement, as manifest in WTO Public Forums and civil society participation in ministerial conferences, is no longer fit for purpose. Rather it reflects an outmoded strategy that once served to underscore the existence and value of the WTO as an international organization and works to neutralize political contestation and publicly promote the benefits of free trade. It is now in need of reform.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement
      Available formats


Corresponding author


Hide All
Azevêdo, R. (2015), ‘MC10 Opening Ceremony’, Speech by Director-General Roberto Azevêdo’, 15 December,, (accessed 17 December 2015).
Beattie, A. (2009), ‘Retread Required’, Financial Times, Asia edition, 1 December, p.7.
Beauzamy, B. (2010), ‘Transnational Social Movements and Democratic Legitimacy’, in Erman, E. and Uhlin, A. (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re-examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Benicchio, R. (2013), ‘The WTO Tries to Prove It Is Relevant, but to Whom?’, 2 December 2013, (accessed 27 October 2015).
Brühl, T. (2010), Representing the People? NGOs in International Negotiations’, in Steffek, J. and Hahn, K. (eds.), Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Buntaine, M. T. (2015), ‘Accountability in Global Governance: Civil Society Claims for Environmental Performance at the World Bank’, International Studies Quarterly, 59(1): 99111.
de Bièvre, D. (2014), ‘A Glass Quite Empty: Issue Groups’ Influence in the Global Trade Regime’, Global Policy, 5(2): 222228.
Deere-Birbeck, C. (2011), Making Global Trade Governance Work for Development: Perspectives and Priorities from Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Ville, F. and Siles-Brügge, G. (2015), TTIP: The Truth about the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2012), Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, E. J., Hochstetler, K., and Clark, A.-M. (2005), Sovereignty, Democracy, and Global Civil Society: State-Society Relations at UN World Conferences, Albany: SUNY Press.
Georgiev, D. and Van der Borght, K. (eds.) (2006) Reform and Development of the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cameron May.
Hannah, E. (2014), ‘The Quest for Accountable Governance: Embedded NGOs and Demand-Driven Advocacy in the International Trade Regime’, Journal of World Trade, 48(3): 457479.
Hannah, E. (2016), NGOs and Global Trade: Non-State Voices in EU Trade Policymaking, Abingdon: Routledge.
Hannah, E., Scott, J. and Trommer, S. (eds) (2015), Expert Knowledge in Global Trade, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
He, B. and Murphy, H. (2007), ‘Global Social Justice at the WTO? The Role of NGOs in Constructing Global Social Contracts’, International Affairs, 83(4): 707727.
Higgott, R. and Erman, E. (2010), ‘Deliberative Global Governance and the Question of Legitimacy: What Can We Learn from the WTO?’, Review of International Studies, 36(2): 449470.
Hoekman, B. (2012), ‘Proposals for WTO Reform: A Synthesis and Assessment’, in Danton, M., Narlikar, A., and Stern, R. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 743775.
Hopewell, K. (2015), ‘Multilateral Trade Governance as Social Field: Global Civil Society and the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy, 22(6): 11281158.
Hopewell, K. (2016), ‘Invisible Barricades: Civil Society and the Discourse of the WTO’, Globalizations, online first,
Howse, R. (2002), ‘From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime’, American Journal of International Law, 96(94): 94117.
Marceau, G. (ed.) (2015), A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO: The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meléndez-Ortiz, R., Bellman, C., and Mendoza, M. R. (2012), The Future and the WTO: Confronting the Challenges, Geneva: ICTSD.
Pianta, M. (2014), ‘Slowing Trade: Global Activism against Trade Liberalization’, Global Policy, 5(2): 214221.
Piewitt, M. (2010), ‘Participatory Governance in the WTO: How Inclusive Is Global Civil Society?’, Journal of World Trade, 44(2): 467488.
Scholte, J. A. (2012), ‘A More Inclusive Global Governance? The IMF and Civil Society in Africa’, Global Governance, 18(2): 185206.
Scholte, J. A., O'Brien, R., and Williams, M. (1998), ‘The WTO and Civil Society’, Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation Working Paper No. 14/98, University of Warwick, Warwick.
Scott, J. and Wilkinson, R. (2010), ‘What Happened to Doha in Geneva? Re-Engineering the WTO's Image while Missing Key Opportunities’, European Journal of Development Research, 22(2): 141153.
Steffek, J. and Ehling, U. (2008), ‘Civil Society Participation at the Margins: The Case of the WTO’, in Steffek, J., Kissling, C., and Nanz, P. (eds.), Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 95115
Steger, D. P. (ed.) (2009), Redesigning the World Trade Organization for the Twenty-First Century, Ottawa: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Tandon, Y. (2015), Trade is War: The West's War against the World, OR Books.
Warwick Commission (2007), The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward?, Coventry: University of Warwick.
Wilkinson, R. (2003), ‘ACUNS in Cancun’, ACUNS Informational Memorandum, 57: 68,
Wilkinson, R. (2005), ‘Managing Global Civil Society: The WTO's Engagement with NGOs’, in Germain, R. D. and Kenny, M. (eds.), The Idea of Global Civil Society: Politics and Ethics in a Globalizing Era, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 160178.
Wilkinson, R. (2006), ‘The WTO in Hong Kong: What It Really Means for the Doha Development Agenda’, New Political Economy, 11(2): 291303.
Wilkinson, R. (2014), What's Wrong with the WTO and How to Fix It, Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Wilkinson, R., Hannah, E., and Scott, J. (2016), ‘The WTO in Nairobi: The Demise of the Doha Development Agenda and the Future of the Multilateral Trading System’, Global Policy, 7(2): 247255.
Williams, M. (2011), ‘Civil Society and the WTO: Contesting Accountability’, in Scholte, J. A. (ed.), Building Global Democracy: Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105127.
Woll, C. (2013), ‘Global Companies as Agenda Setters in the World Trade Organization’. in Mikler, J. (ed.), The Handbook of Global Companies, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 257271.
WTO (no date), ‘10 Things the WTO Can Do’, (accessed 28 October 2015).
WTO (1996), ‘Guidelines for Arrangements on Relations with Non-Governmental Organizations’, 23 July 1996, WT/L/162.
WTO (1999), ‘10 Common Misunderstandings about the WTO’, (accessed 28 October 2015).
WTO (2012), ‘Lamy: “Multilateralism is Struggling”’, opening speech at 2012 Public Forum, 24 September, (accessed 9 May 2016).
WTO (2013), WTO at the Crossroads: A Report on the Imperative of a WTO Reform Agenda, Geneva: WTO.
WTO (2014), ‘Azevêdo Highlights Trade Role in Realizing Africa's “Sheer Potential”’, opening speech at 2014 Public Forum, 2 October, (accessed 9 May 2016).

Reforming WTO-Civil Society Engagement



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed