Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The EC–Biotech dispute and applicability of the SPS Agreement: are the panel's findings built on shaky ground?

  • CHRISTIANE R. CONRAD (a1)

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Christoforou, Theofanis (2004), ‘The Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms in the European Union: The Interplay of Science, Law and Politics’, Common Market Law Review, 41: 637.
Covelli, Nick and Victor, Cohots (2003), ‘The Health Regulation of Biotech Foods under the WTO Agreements’, Journal of International Environmental Law, 6: 773795.
Garcia, Frank J. (2006), ‘The Salmon Case. Evolution of Balancing Mechanisms for Non-Trade Values in WTO’, in Petros, Mavroidis and George, Bermann, Trade and Human Health and Safety, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133152.
Goh, Gavin (2006), ‘Tipping the Apple Cart: The Limits of Science and Law in the SPS Agreement after Japan – Apples’, Journal of World Trade, 40: 655687.
Hudec, Robert E. (2003), ‘Science and “Post-Discriminatory” WTO Law’, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 26: 185195.
Marceau, Gabrielle and Joel, P. Trachtman (2002), ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade’, Journal of World Trade, 36: 811881.
McNair, Arnold Duncan (1986), The Law of Treaties, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pauwelyn, Joost (1999), ‘The WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures as Applied in the First Three SPS Disputes. EC–Hormones, Australia–Salmon and Japan–Varietals’, Journal of International Economic Law, 2: 641664.
Pauwelyn, Joost (2003), ‘Does the WTO Stand for “Deference to” or “Interference with” National Health Authorities When Applying the Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement)?’, in Thomas, Cottier and Petros, Mavroidis, The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 175192.
Scott, Joanne (2003), ‘European Regulation of GMOs and the WTO’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 9: 213.
Stökl, Lorenz (2003), ‘WTO und Gentechnik’, in Martin, Nettesheim and Gerald, Sander, WTO-Recht und Globalisierung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 73101.
Zedalis, Rex J. (2004), ‘The United States/European Communities Biotech Products Case: Opportunity for World Trade Organization Consideration of Whether Internally Applied Non-Tax Measures Fall Within the Scope of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Article XI(1)'s Reference to “Other Measures”’, Journal of World Trade, 38(4): 647659.

The EC–Biotech dispute and applicability of the SPS Agreement: are the panel's findings built on shaky ground?

  • CHRISTIANE R. CONRAD (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed